Channel
@cf_mining_feedback
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,792subscribers
-82 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001339448715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cf_mining_feedback |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cf_mining_feedback |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 2,792 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 2,797 | -26 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 00:55 | 2,823 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 2,828 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 2,832 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 2,834 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:05 | 2,837 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:56 | 2,847 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 2,852 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:26 | 2,860 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:21 | 2,867 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 2,874 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 2,874 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 14 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#feedback ✔️ Clients hits: 🔶 2.24 BNB ≈ 1327$ + 💰 0.01363 BTC ≈ 984$ + 💰 0.0259 BTC ≈ 2312$ + 🔹 0.4362 ETH ≈ 1189$ All clients reviews you can check here: CLICK ONLY LEGIT website: miningcf.com Buy software 👉 @cm_adm
#feedback ✔️ Clients hits: 🔹 + 🔶 ≈ 4626$ All clients reviews you can check here: CLICK ONLY LEGIT website: miningcf.com Buy software 👉 @cm_adm
#feedback ✔️ Clients hits: 🪙 9.7 SOL ≈ 1638$ + 🔹 0.59 ETH ≈ 1472$ + 💲 982 USDT ≈ 982$ All clients reviews you can check here: CLICK ONLY LEGIT website: miningcf.com Buy software 👉 @cm_adm
#feedback ✔️ Clients hits: 💰 0.011 BTC ≈ 734$ + 🔹 0.2927 ETH ≈ 735$ + 🔶 1.531 BNB ≈ 926$ + 🔶 2.03 BNB ≈ 1140$ 🔴 5509 TRX ≈ 917$ + 🔶 1.9 BNB ≈ 1081$ 🔹 0.7 ETH ≈ 1745$ All clients reviews you can check here: CLICK ONLY LEGIT website: miningcf.com Buy software 👉 @cm_adm
#feedback ✔️ Clients hits: 🔹 0.05162 ETH ≈ 1365$ + 🔹 0.332 ETH ≈ 870$ 🔹 0.226 ETH ≈ 592$ 🔹 0.364 ETH ≈ 954$ + 💰 0.01062 BTC ≈ 748$ + 🔶 1.686 BNB ≈ 967$ + 💰 0.01291 BTC ≈ 921$ + 🔹 0.5 ETH ≈ 1162$ + 💰 0.0119 BTC ≈ 839$ + 💲 473 USDT ≈ 473$ All clients reviews you can check here: CLICK …
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @cf_mining_feedback. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Feedback | Mining Wallets™” (@cf_mining_feedback), 2,792 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cf_mining_feedback.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.