Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CG Kung Fu

Channel

CG Kung Fu

@cg_kungfu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,639subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001722787147
TypeChannel
Username@cg_kungfu
DescriptionВелкам в уютный уголок сиджи ништяков, плюшек и новостей. Я Константин Коваленко (@eistan), Senior CG Generalist at ILM/Disney (Australia, Sydney).
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cg_kungfu

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,6326,7416,686.57 August 2026 — 6,678 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,660 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,647 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,636 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,633 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,632 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,687 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,693 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,702 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,719 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,733 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,741 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,726 subscribers29 September 2026 — 6,716 subscribers6 October 2026 — 6,714 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,718 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,705 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,703 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,693 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,679 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,667 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,647 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,642 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,639 subscribers6,6397 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,616–6,757 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 16:446,639-3
3 Nov 2026, 22:366,642-5
1 Nov 2026, 03:506,647-20
28 Oct 2026, 19:286,667-12
25 Oct 2026, 22:506,679-14
22 Oct 2026, 13:466,693-10
19 Oct 2026, 14:356,703-2
16 Oct 2026, 11:166,705-13
13 Oct 2026, 04:116,718+4
6 Oct 2026, 12:016,714-2
29 Sept 2026, 03:016,716-10
19 Sept 2026, 14:586,726-15
14 Sept 2026, 21:596,741+8
11 Sept 2026, 08:206,733+14
6 Sept 2026, 08:006,719+17
2 Sept 2026, 09:486,702+9
30 Aug 2026, 10:346,693+6
27 Aug 2026, 15:336,687+55
24 Aug 2026, 08:176,632-1
21 Aug 2026, 00:236,633first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.4%
avg views ÷ 6,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,480
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held40 (16 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total34,760
Reactions total818
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 02:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,470
Videos
≈676
Links
≈434

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 36s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,477 reactions across 37 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥74730.2%
😁67727.3%
❤26010.5%
💯2439.81%
custom 53888552825771864271998.03%
😱1134.56%
👍793.19%
😢411.66%
💔351.41%
🤩341.37%
🤷‍♂240.969%
custom 538673329815002377390.363%
🤬90.363%
🤔70.283%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,477 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 37 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cg_kungfu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (35.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 17:24 UTC≈1,360 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Если кто юзает кодекс или клод в гудини, тут есть вот такая штука, и она прикольно выглядит (на скрине) что она таким плавающим окном поверх и показывает что делается и даже скрины и рендеры. Но по опыту своему скажу мне это нах не надо потому что я поставил задачу клоду и пошел чай пить, бухать, срать, спать и тд, вернулся и проверяю что за херню он наделал. Позже расскажу что для себя открыл и как можно реально ми…

custom 538885528257718642717💯7😁6🔥4🤷‍♂1

1 Nov 2026, 08:37 UTC≈2,180 views95 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥65😱17💯7❤4👍2

30 Oct 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,220 views55 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Котаны, тут такое дело, как бы это сказать.. по поводу ивента где я должен давать лекцию завтра, я тут разболелся, как спецом блин, и не получается прилететь по состоянию здоровья. Дико обидно хотел со многими увидится вживую наконец то и пообщаться и вообще кайфануть но у моего организма оказались на эти дни и даже недели свои планы. Ничего страшного но лететь противопоказано. Вот картинку прикрепил какая будет про…

💔27😢13❤6😱4custom 53888552825771864273🤷‍♂2

29 Oct 2026, 11:45 UTC≈2,150 views96 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Кто отпишется тот лох!

😁70💯14😱4🤩3❤2🤔1🤷‍♂1custom 53888552825771864271

29 Oct 2026, 10:02 UTC≈2,100 views90 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Как раз к хэллоуину! 🎃

🔥57😁15💯9❤4custom 53888552825771864273🤷‍♂1custom 53867332981500237731

25 Oct 2026, 17:13 UTC≈2,400 views103 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Расскажу по секрету, я тут запустил доп мотивацию ребятам с курса чтоб доделали домашки свои. Первый кто доделает получит 50% за курс обратно! И сразу же у нас есть победитель @losereasp! Первый кто доделал домашку и получает обещанные 50% суммы курса обратно, че я балабол что ли, все по чеснаку. И вот его работа, очень даже клевая получилась, дико горд и теперь буду ей всем хвастаться! Хотя моего конечно тут мало…

🔥61custom 538885528257718642722❤14👍4🤬1😁1

25 Oct 2026, 03:44 UTC≈2,170 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Котаны, тут 1 место освободилось на мой курс! Со скидкой 15к рублей на любой пакет. До курса осталась всего неделя и стартуем! 31 октября, уже эта суббота! Первый кто мне напишет (@eistan) и заполнит заявку получит ее (cgkungfu.ru)!

❤4🔥4🤩3😢1😱1

24 Oct 2026, 10:10 UTC≈2,280 views42 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Мы все ближе и даже частично уже в том моменте нашей жизни когда понятие "реализм" не что то такое не достижимое, а почти даже обычное, причем в рилтайме даже. И это снова напоминает всем о том что нужно прокачивать не способ достижения такого качества картинки, то есть софты кнопки и тулзы, а суть этого всего, корень, идею, смысл! Проще говоря качайте блять уже свои творческие скилы которые вам и помогут в вашей ка…

❤19👍8🔥8💯6😁1

21 Oct 2026, 17:10 UTC≈2,070 views42 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @eldyshov_diomidPhoto

DEED ACTIVE 2026, Episode-2 Международная VFX-конференция студии DEED🔥 Снова один день в Москве студия DEED собирает представителей VFX-сообщества с опытом Wētā FX, ILM, Framestore, MPC для открытого разговора о трендах и современных реалиях индустрии. Гости из Новой Зеландии и Австралии выступят с докладами и поделятся своим опытом со всеми желающих. Спикеры Денис Елдышов – основатель и CEO студии DEED и школы DEE…

🔥29❤5😱4🤩2👍1🤬1

20 Oct 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,490 views40 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Котаны, давайте поддержим девчонок ведущих с их маленьким но уютным каналом! Накидайте им лайков и подписок! 💙

❤21👍8💯7🔥3🤬1

19 Oct 2026, 17:14 UTC≈2,670 views50 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026
Photo

Давно не было подкастов со мной да? Вот и я тоже думаю. https://youtu.be/haHGPwp7-y8?si=stWNFoD-EvNkosTR

❤26😁10🔥8😱3👍2🤬1

15 Oct 2026, 13:43 UTC≈4,010 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Ну че вы там, теребите уже? Отпуска взяли? Новый трейлер если че тут подвезли. Из каждого чайника трубят и из моего пусть тоже. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rz1B4B2yBZY

🔥21👍9😁7🤷‍♂2💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @cg_kungfu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@cg_kungfu edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @cg_kungfu as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
8 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 08:34 UTCAnonymous Poll553 voters

Земляки, перекличка! Кто с Новосиба?

  1. Я10%
  2. Не я88%
  3. Рядом, приеду!2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Motion designer hunter
@motionhunter · 28,465
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
CG Freelance
@cgfreelance · 60,946
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
CGSpeak
@cgspeaks · 42,524
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
SECOND PILOTS | 3D | ANIMATION | Cg | Vfx | Motion | Blender | Houdini Fx | 2D
@secondpilots_cg · 33,464
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
VideoSmile
@videosmile_ru · 27,225
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
Polygon
@poly3ds · 35,924
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 2 September 2026
Blender Tricks
@blender_tricks · 26,539
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
Метаверсище и ИИще
@cgevent · 53,530
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CG Kung Fu” (@cg_kungfu), 6,639 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cg_kungfu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.