Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЧГ. Інше

Channel

ЧГ. Інше

@ch_g_inshe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,178subscribers

+2,266 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001428373408
TypeChannel
Username@ch_g_inshe
DescriptionПідрозділ @chervonyguber Підвали ОСС КНУ: @black_huber_ai
Created22 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ch_g_inshe

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9029,1788,0406 August 2026 — 6,912 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,912 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,910 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,908 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,902 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,911 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,937 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,938 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,940 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,957 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,113 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,198 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,366 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,380 subscribers24 September 2026 — 7,854 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,999 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,007 subscribers15 October 2026 — 8,012 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,019 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,238 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,317 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,998 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,021 subscribers7 November 2026 — 9,178 subscribers6 August 20267 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net +2,266. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,561–9,519 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:569,178+157
3 Nov 2026, 21:359,021+23
31 Oct 2026, 14:408,998+681
28 Oct 2026, 06:468,317+79
25 Oct 2026, 03:168,238+219
21 Oct 2026, 17:518,019+7
15 Oct 2026, 01:278,012+5
11 Oct 2026, 14:578,007+8
4 Oct 2026, 18:597,999+145
24 Sept 2026, 21:407,854+474
16 Sept 2026, 17:377,380+14
12 Sept 2026, 10:397,366+168
8 Sept 2026, 13:367,198+85
3 Sept 2026, 14:017,113+156
31 Aug 2026, 08:326,957+17
25 Aug 2026, 04:126,940+2
22 Aug 2026, 09:166,938+1
19 Aug 2026, 09:476,937+26
16 Aug 2026, 17:156,911+9
12 Aug 2026, 20:046,902first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
80.3%
avg views ÷ 9,178 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,370
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held60 (20 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total228,400
Reactions total7,647
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 11:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,780
Videos
≈254
Links
≈1,250

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 03s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,941 reactions across 59 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,37433.9%
😁1,58716.0%
🤡1,30913.2%
🤬9069.11%
🤮4334.36%
💘4044.06%
🥰3223.24%
🤯2822.84%
🤣2772.79%
🔥2642.66%
👀1781.79%
💔940.946%
❤‍🔥810.815%
👍770.775%
😢670.674%
😭520.523%
🤩470.473%
👎210.211%
🍓200.201%
💩200.201%
18 further kinds1261.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,941 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 59 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ch_g_inshe. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 14 of 32 posts held from the last 30 days (43.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC≈4,300 views60 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Poll

Чи зрозуміло вам, як проходитиме зимова сесія в КНУ після нових листів та наказів?

  1. Так, знаю формат і порядок проведення іспитів8%
  2. Частково: знаю, очно чи онлайн, але не всі деталі26%
  3. Ні, отримую суперечливу інформацію19%
  4. Ні, факультет/інститут нічого не пояснив39%
  5. Не навчаюся в КНУ / переглянути результати7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😭33🤡25😁2

6 Nov 2026, 16:18 UTC≈10,000 views310 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Написали іспит? Тепер залишилось довести, що це зроблено самостійно. Адміністація КНУ запровадила обов'язкові усні співбесіди та можливість обнулення письмових робіт. 6 листопада в КНУ видали новий наказ №1262-32, який змінює порядок проведення зимової сесії. Відтепер після кожного письмового іспиту студенти всіх рівнів освіти мають проходити обов'язкову усну співбесіду (навіть після іспитів у формі тестування). Пі…

🤬228🤡70🫡7🔥3😢2

6 Nov 2026, 15:59 UTC≈4,500 views139 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Поки пропоную ознайомитись з укриттям на ФРЕКС, де іспити мають складати 500 студентів факультету

😁109🤣12😭9❤5🙊4

6 Nov 2026, 15:57 UTC≈4,420 views117 reactionsread 8 November 2026

До речі, адміністрація КНУ сьогодні видала новий наказ щодо формату проведення сесії. Зараз буде

💔94🤬8🔥7😁5🫡3

6 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈5,090 views229 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

На прохання активного користувача бота анонімного зворотного зв'язку відразу надсилаю фото укриття факультету кібернетики, в якому студентам пропонується складати іспити.

😁171🤯31❤17🤣7🙏3

6 Nov 2026, 15:51 UTC≈5,180 views236 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

У КНУ визначили, хто складатиме зимову сесію очно, а хто може залишитися онлайн. Сьогодні наш любімий проректор Гожик розіслав деканам та директорам роз’яснення щодо проведення іспитів. Студенти 1–2 курсів денної форми мають складати їх очно, тоді як для старших курсів, магістрантів і заочників передбачено переважно дистанційний формат. Водночас деканати можуть самостійно запроваджувати очні іспити для старших курс…

🤬154🤡60🤮10❤8👍4

6 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC≈4,370 views79 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Тут мав бути розбір контракту Валерія Копійки та розповідь про те, що він передбачає, але зараз буде допис про новий лист-роз'яснення таваріща Гожика щодо іспитів

❤68⚡5😁3😇2👀1

6 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC≈5,250 views237 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Нагадую, що ніяка Ігнатюк чи її посіпаки не можуть змушувати студентів підписувати оце незаконне гімно. Якщо будуть спроби тиску, фіксуйте та кажіть. Особисто допоможу зі скаргою до омбудсмана 🤝

❤209🔥18🥰7💘2🍓1

6 Nov 2026, 09:38 UTC≈5,780 views245 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Як нам казав куратор: "Без підписання зобов'язання буде недопуск до іспитів"

🤡229❤6🤬6🤮4

6 Nov 2026, 09:28 UTC≈6,900 views307 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

На економічному факультеті КНУ вирішили, що безпеку студентів можна забезпечити папірчиком. Тепер студентів добровільно-примусово (вітання автократії деканші Ігнатюк) змушують підписувати «зобов’язання» про відповідальність за наслідки невиконання правил під час повітряної тривоги. Тобто рішення про очні іспити та пов’язані з ним безпекові ризики створює адміністрація, а відповідальність за наслідки перекладає на ст…

🤬201🤡59❤41😭5🤩1

5 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC≈4,400 views182 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Дякую Студпарламенту за ініціативу. Буду з нетерпінням чекати понеділка аби подивитись як пан (поки що) проректор Гожик пояснить, нащо наказав деканам та директорам виводити всіх студентів на очну сесію та як досі залишається на посаді попри закінчення контракту ще навесні 2026 🍿🍿🍿

❤154🔥14🤡8🥰5🍓1

4 Nov 2026, 13:16 UTC≈6,070 views306 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Отже, можна констатувати, що керівники структурних підрозділів КНУ (за підказкою досі не звільненого бугровівського проректора Гожика) буквально "підтерлися" наказом в.о. ректора Ільченка (перший проректор у Бугрова) та формулюванням "переважно дистанційно". На частині структурних підрозділів студенти всіх курсів (а не лише 1 і 2) й взагалі складатимуть іспити одним днем у 5-6 змін... Складно уявити як члени команд…

🤬223❤37🤡34🔥9🤮3

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @ch_g_inshe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTCFinal Results2,150 voters approx.

Чи зрозуміло вам, як проходитиме зимова сесія в КНУ після нових листів та наказів?

  1. Так, знаю формат і порядок проведення іспитів8%
  2. Частково: знаю, очно чи онлайн, але не всі деталі26%
  3. Ні, отримую суперечливу інформацію19%
  4. Ні, факультет/інститут нічого не пояснив39%
  5. Не навчаюся в КНУ / переглянути результати7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧГ. Інше” (@ch_g_inshe), 9,178 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ch_g_inshe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.