Channel
@ch_marcopolo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
460subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001788875379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ch_marcopolo |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 20 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ch_marcopolo |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Oct 2026, 21:46 | 460 | -2 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 12:21 | 462 | -3 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 03:39 | 465 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 466 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:27 | 469 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 467 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 468 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 468 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
266 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 177 | 66.5% | |
| 🤮 | 35 | 13.2% | |
| 👎 | 29 | 10.9% | |
| 👏 | 25 | 9.40% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 266 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مردم (یه عده) پناه بردن به آمریکا که ما نمی تونیم اینا رو براندازی کنیم تو بیا با جنگ سرنگونش کن، حالا آمریکا با محاصره اقتصادی داره میگه منم نمی تونم با جنگ کاری کنم خودتون بیاد سرنگونشون کنید. #خلاصه_جنگ
👍16👎1
میپرسه مارکو دیگه دنبال براندازی جمهوری اسلامی نیستی؟ پاسخ: نه واقعا. من رفتن جمهوری اسلامی رو در چهارچوب گذار به سمت یک رژیم کاملا دموکراتیک و مستقل و صرفا در چهارچوب مصلحت ایرانی صلاح می دونستم اما جریانات دی ماه بهم ثابت کرد جریان جمهوری خواه فعلا توان لازم برای مدیریت گذار امن رو نداره و جریان پلشت و متحجر پهلوی چی با حمایت خارجی قطعا گذار رو به بیراهه میبره و استقلال و امنیت ملی ایران قطعا به خطر میافته و خبری ه…
👍18👎4
انتصاب مجدد طائب از سوی مجتبی خامنه ای یعنی قرار نیست هیچ تحول مثبتی در حوزه سیاست داخلی اتفاق بیافته. قبلا هم گفته بودم مملکت حداقل ۲۰ سالی هست که با همین دستفرمون داره جلو میره و دقیقا رانندش هم همین راننده فعلی بوده. تیم معتمدش هم همه زنده و سرپا هستن.
🤮6👍3👎1
مارکو هنوز منتقد جمهوری اسلامیه. فردا که اوضاع آروم شد نگید نگفتما. الان جنگه و من مجبورم به چرندیات شما ها پاسخ بدم و الا ماه ها میتونم از بدی های جمهوری اسلامی بدون اینکه تکراری بشه داستان بنویسم.
👍12🤮5👎1
اینکه بعد از جنگ قیمت ملک رشد کرد بعد از گرانی فولاد و یونولیت و لوله اتصالات دلیل اصلیش باور به بقای جمهوری اسلامیه. همه مطمئن شدن حکومت پابرجاس و قطعا در به همون پاشنه میچرخه.
👍7🤮3
میبینم که ۶ ماهه ریدمان زدیم به نظم بین الملل و هیچکس هم هیچ کاری از دستش بر نمیاد.
👍9🤮1
قرار بود ۳ ماه پیش خارک و همه خطوط لوله نفت منفجر بشن. ترامپ گفت.
👏4
بنظرتون اسراییل در جنگ اخیر(۱۳ روزه) چرا به جنگ ورود نکرد؟
جام جهانی هم تموم شد و آبی از ترامپ گرم نشد. اساتید نظری ندارید؟
👍4🤮1
سوال: ترکیه مگه عضو ناتو نیست پس چه نیازی به بستن پیمان امنیتی با عربستان داره؟ پاسخ: نیازی نداره. عربستان پول خوب داده اینم امضا کرده. عربستان ترسیده!
👍10👎2
ترکیه، پاکستان و عربستان پیمان امنیتی نوشتن. می دونید این اقدام الان چه معنی میده؟ این اقدام در واقع اعتراف رسمی به از بین رفتن نظم منطقه ای قبلی به ریاست آمریکا و لزوم ترسیم نظم جدید در قبال قلدر جدید منطقه ایرانه. وارد دوران جدیدی شدیم!
👍15👎3
ترامپ: در ونزوئلا خیلی خوب پیش می‌رویم. نفت زیادی از ونزوئلا می‌گیریم و رابطه‌مان با آن‌ها هم بسیار خوب است. میلیاردها و میلیاردها بشکه نفت از ونزوئلا خارج می‌شود. ونزوئلا یکی از غنی‌ترین نقاط جهان از نظر نفت است. و همان‌طور که می‌دانید، آن یک جنگ ۴۸ دقیقه‌ای بود؛ ۴۸ دقیقه طول کشید. و هزینه جنگ را با آنچه از آنجا بیرون آورده‌ایم، چندین و چند و چند برابر جبران کرده‌ایم. قبلاً کجا چنین چیزی شنیده‌اید؟ هیچ‌جا نشنیده…
👍6🤮3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ch_marcopolo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مارکوپولو | چرندیات” (@ch_marcopolo), 460 subscribers as measured 13 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ch_marcopolo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.