Channel
@chakvprave
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,855subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001674842797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chakvprave |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chakvprave |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 1,855 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 1,856 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 1,854 | +7 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:04 | 1,847 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 1,851 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 1,849 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 1,846 | +9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 1,837 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 1,833 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 1,829 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:10 | 1,830 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 1,829 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
169 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 64 | 37.9% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 31.4% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 23.7% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 4.14% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.18% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.592% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chakvprave. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Думала, что же написать в эту пятницу позитивного и доброго. А тут новость сама меня нашла Энхерту (трастузумаб дерукстекан) препарат включен в Перечень ЖНВЛП для терапии неоперабельного или метастического Her2 положительного рака молочной железы, опухолей с низким уровнем экспрессии her2 и распространенного her2 положительного рака желудка. С 4 раза Комиссия Минздрава одобрила его для включения в перечень. Во мно…
🔥8👍5
Не знаете как стать популярным в сети? Сейчас расскажу. Просто завирусите негатив в сети и разверните в свою пользу🤌 Например, недавно мне случайно попался рилс какого-то маркетолога в запрещённой сети с базы отдыха в Ирганае (Дагестан), где я была, со словами: посмотрите какой поток туристов в этом году в Дагестане, ни одного человека. Между строк так и проследилось пусто, Наверное, потому что владельцы базы не по…
❤12🔥7👏5
Как я попала в топ юристов по версии GPT - не знаю, но это очень приятно, что сеть так считывает все мои труды по соцсетям☺️ Но еще больше меня впечатлило, что он написал о моем месте работы в аппарате Уполномоченного по правам человека 👀👀👀 Это была практика во время обучения в университете, как он об этом узнал 👀👀👀
🔥11
Сейчас проводила эфир совместно с НКО «Крылья», где в рамках него отвечала на самые разные вопросы по теме инвалидности: как устанавливается, как обжалуется, положен ли больничный, на что важно обращать внимание при установлении инвалидности. И коснулись того, что можно ли обратиться к искусственному интеллекту для составления, например, жалобы для оспаривания решения бюро МСЭ. Мой ответ всегда один: обратиться мо…
👍4
Сегодня начинается ВТОРОЙ поток моего обучения по основам медико-социальной экспертизы. Безумно приятно и ценно, что коллеги доверяют и приходят за новыми знаниями❤️ Завтра уже состоится первая лекция, поэтому еще сегодня можно будет присоединиться 🤗
🔥6❤5👍2
Бывает такая консультация с клиентом, когда смотришь документы по одному вопросу, а находишь нарушения в другом. Не так давно была у меня такая история. Ко мне обратилась девушка для консультации по вопросу получения доступного жилья для своей мамы с инвалидностью первой группы по диагнозу рассеянный склероз, проживающей в Московской области. Данное заболевание входит в перечень, по которому нужна дополнительная жи…
🔥9❤7👍3🤝1
Совсем забыла поделиться сертификатом по результатам прохождения обучения весной 🙈 Повышаю квалификацию медицинского юриста у лучших коллег ❤️
🔥14❤6👍6
Выходные в Нижнем Новгороде. Еще один город России в моей копилке. Как мне написал один друг про город: он стирает границы невозможного. И это правда. Я думала, что он будет сложным для передвижения на коляске, но оказалось наоборот. Куда я хотела сходить - везде смогла) Люди приветливые, ресторан нижегородской кухни «Самовар да утки» - вкусный. Красивые усадьбы 18-19 века. Ну и ,конечно, слияние двух рек и закаты…
❤16👍5💯2🔥2
Video message, posted without a caption
👍5👏2😁2
Signed Анна Черняева
⚡️Прокуратура г. Самары признало нарушение прав пациента при обжаловании решения МСЭ. Ситуация: пациентка с раком молочной железы, которой при очередном переосвидетельствовании в марте 2026 года сняли группу инвалидности, подала заявление на обжалование, которое я ей составляла. Отправляли мы в последний день подачи, но за мою практику было много таких отправлений и все было нормально. До этого случая. Наступили м…
👍10❤7🔥7
Signed Анна Черняева
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @chakvprave. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ЧАК В ПРАВЕ | Социальный, медицинский и военный юрист” (@chakvprave), 1,855 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chakvprave.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.