سه نفر هم پرایوت بود لینکشون رو بفرستن بهم ، برای اوناهم بزارم تا شب😭🤍

Channel
𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒓
@challengewabisabi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002065460802 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @challengewabisabi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/challengewabisabi |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 4 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 5 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 6 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒓 pinned «این پیام رو فوروارد کنید تا بر اساس شخصیتتون که تو دیلیتون میبینم بگم در زندگی قبلی چیکار کردین که الان تو ایران با آخوندا دارین زندگی میکنین جوین هم باشین مرسی😭🤍»
https://t.me/Aphrood تو زندگی قبلیت تمام نامههای عاشقانهی مردم رو دزدیده بودی تا هیچکدوم به مقصد نرسن چون صرفا حوصلت سر رفته بود (برای یوتاب) تو زندگی قبلیت یه شهر رو به آتیش کشیدی فقط چون پادشاه اون شهر با دوستات بد حرف زده بوده (برا نور زندگی یوتاب)
https://t.me/virgopassion تو زندگی قبلیت کتابدار سلطنتی بودی و هر کتاب ممنوعهای رو قبل از تحویل به مردم خودت میخوندی و گربههای قصر رو هم میدزدیدی
https://t.me/foreveronlyblue تو زندگی قبلیت به تمام شرورهای تاریخ فرصت دوباره دادی و باعث شدی نصف بدبختیهای دنیا دوباره تکرار بشه.
https://t.me/Damahi7 تو زندگی قبلیت صرفا چون از پادشاه خوشت نمی اومد فقط با یه جمله قانعش کردی که تاجوتختشو بده به برادر کوچیکترش و مملکت رو سپردی دست یه بچهی 7 ساله
https://t.me/flvkid تو زندگی قبلیت دلقک دربار بودی و انقدر پادشاه رو جلوی مردم ضایع کردی که حکومت رو به فروپاشی کشوندی.
https://t.me/hanajvcxr تو زندگی قبلیت خودت قانون فوتبال رو نوشتی و عمداً قانون آفساید رو گذاشتی که نسل بشر رو عذاب بدی
https://t.me/limelightbtw تو زندگی قبلیت رئیس یه سازمان جاسوسی بودی که همهی زیردستات رو ایگنور میکردی فقط وقتی کار داشتی باهاشون حرف میزدی
https://t.me/sunxild تو زندگی قبلیت فیلسوف دربار بودی و برای هر اتفاق ساده ۱۸۷ تا دلیل منطقی میآوردی و آخرش میگفتی "ولی خدا بزرگه"
https://t.me/Thezhearchive تو زندگی قبلیت مهندس دربار بودی که پروژهها رو عمداً نصفهکاره ول میکردی تا بری موسیقی بزنی.مملکت رو باد هوا بود
https://t.me/homeofdepprwesion تو زندگی قبلیت شکارچی هیولا بودی و یه بار برای تفریح وارد جنگل مقدس شدی، روح جنگل رو اذیت کردی و بعد وسایلشون رو هم برداشتی.
☃1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @challengewabisabi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Bluewhispertomoon · 961 postیایایا🐟
@Damahi7 · 3111 postKazama de Mirkwood ⁶³⁵
@flvkid · 1511 post𝑭𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒏𝒍𝒚🦁
@foreveronlyblue · 1391 post𝖶𝖺𝗅𝖽𝖾𝗂𝗇𝗌𝖺𝗆𝗄𝖾𝗂𝗍🍒
@Forme82 · 2531 post𝓝
@hanajvcxr · 4621 postمحــفل افسـردہـے هـستـی°•
@homeofdepprwesion · 2121 postṇҽⱳ ℓıfҽ
@newlifelu · 2651 post𝘚𝘩𝘪𝘣𝘶𝘺𝘢
@shibuyaiscold · 1941 post᥉ᥙꪀᥴɦꪱɗ
@sunxild · 841 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@challengewabisabi named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑪𝒐𝒈𝒆𝒓” (@challengewabisabi), 4 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/challengewabisabi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.