Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for История одной фотографии

Channel

История одной фотографии

@channel_poto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,077subscribers

+322 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882658061
TypeChannel
Username@channel_poto
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/channel_poto

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,7527,0776,914.57 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,752 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,760 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,755 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,760 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,761 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,757 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,766 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,938 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,009 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,018 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,010 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,016 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,077 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,703–7,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 21:017,077+61
13 Sept 2026, 11:587,016+6
9 Sept 2026, 21:377,010-8
4 Sept 2026, 23:177,018+9
1 Sept 2026, 02:057,009+71
29 Aug 2026, 06:376,938+172
26 Aug 2026, 08:366,766+9
23 Aug 2026, 00:246,757-4
19 Aug 2026, 14:486,761+1
16 Aug 2026, 08:366,760+5
13 Aug 2026, 01:376,755-5
10 Aug 2026, 06:346,760+8
7 Aug 2026, 13:056,752-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:016,755no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:566,755first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 46 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,241 reactions across 43 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍44135.5%
26521.4%
😢17514.1%
😁13611.0%
👎816.53%
❤‍🔥675.40%
💔504.03%
🗿171.37%
🫡70.564%
🥴20.161%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
45
across the posts below
Posts paid on
38
of 46 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @channel_poto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC161 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Пилот Honda Джон Сёртис отказался участвовать в гонке на экспериментальной машине RA302 с магниевым корпусом, сочтя её слишком опасной. Вместо него за руль сел новичок Жо Шлессер — для него это был шанс проявить себя. Но уже на третьем круге автомобиль вылетел с трассы, врезался в насыпь и загорелся. Магниевый корпус вспыхнул мгновенно. Шлессер погиб. На фото видно, как мимо охваченной пламенем RA302 проезжает Сёртис

😢3👍2

19 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC588 views22 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Адольф Гитлер проводит досуг , катаясь на санках, Германия, 1936 год. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

🗿95👎4😁4

19 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC679 views29 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Автоповозка с головой лошади — необычное транспортное средство начала 1900-х годов, целью которого было меньше пугать лошадей на проезжей части, чем это делали мотоциклы. Такой дизайн авто запатентовал Юрайя Смит в 1899 году. Практичность идеи заключалась в том, что внутри головы размещался ещё и топливный бак. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

😁15👍104

18 Aug 2026, 09:12 UTC714 views32 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Давка, произошедшая 15 апреля 1989 года на стадионе «Хиллсборо» в Шеффилде во время полуфинального матча Кубка Англии по футболу между клубами «Ноттингем Форест» и «Ливерпуль» и повлёкшая смерть 96 болельщиков «Ливерпуля». Всего же в трагедии получили ранения разной степени тяжести 766 человек. 📸История одной фотографии

😢28👍21💔1

17 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC758 views40 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мужчина пытается смягчить тяжелые условия сыну в тюрьме для военопленных. 31 марта 2003 года. Ан Нажав (An Najaf), Ирак. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

😢30💔91

17 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC782 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Музыканты играют для коров, чтобы узнать, влияет ли музыка на количество молока, производимого коровами, 1930 год. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

19👍8

16 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC903 views21 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Профессиональный крысолов хвастается своим уловом. Крысоловы спускались в канализации Европы, а платили им за каждую убитую крысу. Собственно сейчас так же делают в Индии. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

13👍8

15 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC953 views27 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Красноармейцы на надувной десантной лодке А-3 во время тренировки. 12 июля 1940 года. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

❤‍🔥20👍52

14 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,050 views38 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Палестинские мальчики вскинули их игрушечные пистолеты в знак неповиновения израильтянам. Март 1993 года. Палестинские территории, Сектор Газа. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

19👎11👍4💔2🫡2

14 Aug 2026, 11:08 UTC≈1,000 views24 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

В ожидании такси с картиной Ван Гога в руках. Лондон, 1969 год. #История #Фото 📸История одной фотографии

👍168

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @channel_poto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“История одной фотографии” (@channel_poto), 7,077 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/channel_poto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.