Channel
@channelainlight
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,184subscribers
-47 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001657012033 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @channelainlight |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/channelainlight |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 1,184 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 1,186 | -7 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:56 | 1,193 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:13 | 1,197 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 1,207 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 1,211 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 1,216 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 1,218 | -10 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:44 | 1,228 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,231 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 1,231 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤓 | 10 | 37.0% | |
| 🍓 | 7 | 25.9% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5217702154386550137 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 3.70% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Наконец-то на shikimori.io/animes рейтинг по оценкам которые на самом шики и ставили. Хвала яйцам. Мне так не нравилось что они просто брали оценку с MAL. Теперь вы без проблем можете посмотреть какая оценка среди пользователей самого крупного аниме.... как его назвать? Аниме сайта с оценками аниме и комментариями? Кстати добавляйтесь shikimori.io/LainLight и пишите я вас тоже если что добавлю
Signed лейн лайт
ПАЧИМУ ОН А НЕ Я
Signed амелия
Sticker, posted without a caption
💊1
Signed амелия
Бл, в скинах на очки. Гуррен Лаганн. Тайтл имба. Дроп будет 1% и снова миллионы будет стоить так что я мимо
Signed амелия
Друзья там в рф гитхаб, гугл и сайт эппл отвалились. Я надеюсь это просто совпадение и у них не устарело оборудование как это было с ютубом, потому что это пиздец UPD: заработало
Signed амелия
Почему стоит мне купить подарок как его цена начинает падать? Передайте там чтобы пропампили лягушек
🥰3
Signed амелия
типо спасибо вам что уже кто то из вас проголосовал но фидбэк в целом от бота хуевый
🥰1
Signed амелия
Короче чота пиздец грустна все по голосам думаю забить хуй на нормальную систему голосований через бота. Опять делать через сам канал . Не хотят люди переходить в бота чтобы проголосовать, им проще в канале тыкнуть
🤓1
Signed амелия
@votes_desu_bot чуваки и чувихи ну давайте сделайте что нибудь дайте хотя бы 5 голосов отрыва у кого-то
Signed амелия
а что, если было бы аниме, где девушка, чем больше романтических чувств у неё появляется, тем больше начинала бы превращаться в огромного кайдзю и просто становится ебаной годзиллой? а, оно уже есть
Signed амелия
@votes_desu_bot Обновил логику голосований, чтобы в каждом раунде не было по 39 голосований, теперь, со временем, количество уменьшается, участницы которые не набирают голосов "отсекаются" Логика: Swiss + плей-офф выбирается по стартовому размеру пула: 65-100 участниц: 5 Swiss → отсечка 3+ очк. → еще 1 Swiss → топ-16 плей-офф 33-64: 5 Swiss → топ-16 плей-офф 17-32: 4 Swiss → топ-8 плей-офф 9-16: 3 Swiss → топ-…
Signed амелия
Киберпанк. Скора будем таких же аниме роботов делать?
🍓7
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @channelainlight. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Личный блог Лейн Лайта” (@channelainlight), 1,184 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/channelainlight.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.