🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源

Channel
杭州911报告📮
@chaodaoD
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43,694subscribers
+11,293 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001602691456 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chaodaoD |
| Description | هایی |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chaodaoD |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:55 | 43,694 | +599 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:19 | 43,095 | +401 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 42,694 | +384 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 42,310 | +72 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:54 | 42,238 | +911 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:20 | 41,327 | +996 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 12:02 | 40,331 | +633 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 39,698 | +233 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:25 | 39,465 | +281 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 39,184 | +226 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 38,958 | +178 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 38,780 | +101 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 38,679 | +325 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 38,354 | +169 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:58 | 38,185 | +258 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 37,927 | +346 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 37,581 | +518 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 37,063 | +487 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 36,576 | +146 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 36,430 | first reading |
Engagement
149 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.69%
- avg views ÷ 43,694 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 301
- 87 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 87
- of 149 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 87 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 149 (25 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 26,213 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 18
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 218
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
19 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 84.2% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 149 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 149 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
(报告模板) 【老师艺名】雯雯 【联系方式】@wenwen6182 【上课地址】拱墅教室 【上课价位】3000pp 【验证留名】Hkjioo 【验证时间】9月21日 【颜值身材】9.9分 【服务内容】课表都有 【服务态度】10分 【优点缺点】情绪价值 【体验细节】 关注雯雯很久了,之前是工作太忙了,就一直没有约到!这个周末有空就果断约上老师PP!看到老师的第一眼就觉得来对了,这妹子好美,好有御姐范儿。让人好有征服的欲望,想到等一下就跟她啪啪啪,老二已经硬的不行啦。老师很热情,温柔。在床上柔韧性很好,各种姿势都能轻松拿捏,水多,狠狠地征服,她嘴里一直喊着“老公,快操死我呀,射给我!”。太得劲儿了,敏感体质,很容易高潮的那种!后入看着她的大屁股,很有弹性,啪啪的撞击声,很带劲!细节把握的很好,没有那种很刻意去叫的那种感觉,都是很自然的呻吟,很满意的一次出击,有空了必返!! 备注: 报告出自911
【验证留名】:宰 【验证时间】:9.20 【妹子花名】:花仙子 【联系方式】:@Bhzyan 【所在位置】:杭州 上城 【修车水费】:1200p 【身高身材】:165左右 【颜值相似】:9.5 【凶器罩杯】:C+ 【服务项目】:课表上 【服务详情】:妹妹颜值身材在线,资料人照9分,甜美女友风,声音轻声细语,温柔可人,眼神清冷中带狐媚之风,皮肤白的发光手感好,胸型很棒,很翘,乳头乳晕大小适中,吃咪咪时候很享受看来就是敏感区了。腰上无赘肉,小腹平坦,腰臀比好,翘臀紧致拍打清脆,后入有臀浪,过程:女友式互动调情,口活无齿感,吸吮感,棒身,龟头,马眼都会照顾到,眼神放电看着你,各种姿势都非常配合,女上会主动坐摇,摇的起劲不停让我抓奶,下面紧致湿润,水多,会主动夹,较紧,快速抽插时能感觉水量明显增多,有阻尼感甚至褶皱感,加强出货速度。强烈推荐 备注:报告出自911
🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源
【老师艺名】 小希 【联系方式】 @xiaoxi520666 【验证留名】 JJ 【验证时间】19.20 【上课价位】1500 【颜值身材】人照9,身材满分 【服务态度】情绪价值拉满 【优点缺点】 没有缺点 【推荐程度】10分 【体验细节】关注好几天了,今天正好有空,立马跟老师约好,等了大概20多分钟老师就到了,接到老师人照基本一致,那一刻心跳都加速了,沦陷了跟老师聊了会儿天,拉进了距离感,然后老师贴心的进了浴室一起洗了澡抱抱亲亲也很爽,回到床上互相挑逗亲亲开始战斗老师皮肤很光滑很白小舌头也软软糯糯的口起来没有任何齿感像一只迷人的小猫咪吸允着我的老二, 老师配合度高,像跟女朋友在做爱,尤其一对脑子坐在我上面上下晃动还是挺刺激的感觉差不多了我还是换成传教士一顿输出,感觉老师不像其他老师一到时间就就着急催钟,这点很加分最终老师还是很温柔,情趣价值给的到位。必返 备注:报告出自911
🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源
🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源
🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源
【专用模板】: 【联系方式】:虾虾 @xiaxia66t1 【喝茶留名】:赋予 【喝茶时间】:9.18 【喝茶价格】:1700P 【芳龄身高】:很完美的身高体重,20岁 【罩杯手感】:c的大小,好捏 【服务内容】:课表 【优点缺点】:美丽,服务好,很细心态度很好,doi很有感情,虾虾像我女朋友 【体验细节】: 在榜单上看见虾虾第一眼就被吸引了,这颜值爱了,和虾虾约好了时间去,到了虾虾小区找到课室,上楼进门第一眼本人要比照片更好看,虾虾很热情招呼我坐下休息一会,交了水费,有陪浴,忍不住让虾虾水中萧,洗澡过程特别仔细,虾虾萌萌的,身材苗条,一看就是年轻的肉体。抱了下,皮肤手感不错,胸紧致有料,没有肚子,顺便又是一顿摸。不得不承认虾虾口活是相当不错,差点给我舔射了,感觉快要遭不住了,擦干抱着虾虾就在床上吃起了嫩乳,同时手揉小穴,虾虾呼吸急促,下面水很快就出来了,差不多让她服务。从我的胸口舔到二弟,虾虾很会吸,包裹感强,我直接一…
【老师艺名】茗儿 【联系方式】 @waiwai0718 【上课地址】拱墅小区 【上课价位】1500/p 【验证留名】失一 【验证时间】9.18 【颜值身材】清纯甜美 身材特别好 【服务内容】老师课表都有 【优点缺点】长相甜美 温柔体贴 【服务态度】满意 【体验细节】妹子人照9分左右,属于颜值嫩妹,皮肤偏白,五官精致,乳头乳晕正常大小粉嫩,下面毛量适中,日感偏紧而且水好多,大蟒🐍管饱,服务事前事后陪洗,口技柔软无齿感会深喉,态度方面不过分的要求都会满足,很不错,聊天提供情绪感非常的充足。给我的感觉就是良家女友感,爱爱各种姿势很配合,耐心陪伴不催人 总体来说茗儿的颜值属上乘,身材不错,嫩妹干起来能听到水声,后入感官绝佳。
🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源
🌈 🫂杭州交流群组 ✅杭州认证资源
Showing the 12 most recent of 149 posts we hold for @chaodaoD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杭州911报告📮” (@chaodaoD), 43,694 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chaodaoD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.