Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Charlie Sharp Entry πŸ“Š

Channel

Charlie Sharp Entry πŸ“Š

@charliesharpentry

Not marked by Telegram, checked 18 August 2026

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

2,297subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002230868324
TypeChannel
Username@charliesharpentry
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/charliesharpentry

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2972,3062,301.515 August 2026 β€” 2,300 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 2,301 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 2,306 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 2,300 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 2,299 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 2,301 subscribers4 September 2026 β€” 2,306 subscribers10 September 2026 β€” 2,300 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 2,297 subscribers15 August 202613 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 29 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,296–2,307 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 18:152,297-3
10 Sept 2026, 06:562,300-6
4 Sept 2026, 17:202,306+5
28 Aug 2026, 21:252,301+2
25 Aug 2026, 19:562,299-1
22 Aug 2026, 21:432,300-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:222,306+5
16 Aug 2026, 18:282,301+1
15 Aug 2026, 13:462,300first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 8 October 2025 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

178 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀8145.5%
πŸ”₯5128.7%
😁105.62%
πŸ₯°95.06%
πŸ‘84.49%
πŸ‘73.93%
⚑31.69%
πŸŽ‰31.69%
🐳31.69%
🀩31.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 20 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Apr 2026, 14:52 UTCβ‰ˆ2,960 views24 reactionsread 15 August 2026

There's still crowd in here. I'm onto something... Ai trading. People said that Ai is the LAST evolutionary invention from humanity. What do you think? πŸ‘€

❀15πŸ‘4🐳3😁2

20 Apr 2026, 14:42 UTCβ‰ˆ2,950 views22 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Anyone still trade here? πŸ‘€

πŸ”₯14❀6😁2

8 Feb 2026, 07:33 UTCβ‰ˆ4,540 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

⚠️ ATTENTION ❗️❗️❗️ Today is the LAST DAY Charlie will be sharing the investor password, everyone. It’s also the final day of preparation before the market opens next week. For those who haven’t received the investor password yet or still want full details about the copy trading, before the password gets RESET, click COPYTRADE CHARLIE Don’t miss out πŸ”₯

❀4🀩3πŸ₯°2πŸ‘1😁1

7 Feb 2026, 11:42 UTCβ‰ˆ3,830 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Charlie opens the INVESTOR PASSWORD πŸ”“ First of all, sorry for being busy and inactive for a while β€” I’m back now and fully active again. For those of you still on the fence, now’s the time to see REAL TRADING. πŸ“Š You’ll be able to see: Real-time entries & exits Lot size & risk management Real profit & drawdown β€” no filters ❌ No edits ❌ No tricks ❌ No empty talk ⏰ LIMITED ACCESS Investor password is only open: …

❀2

26 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTCβ‰ˆ2,830 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Are you READY for the next move? πŸ“ˆπŸ’°

  1. βœ… YES, let’s go83%
  2. ⏳ Not yet23%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

😁5πŸ”₯2❀1

26 Jan 2026, 05:46 UTCβ‰ˆ2,630 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Hey everyone β€” quick one. Sorry I went quiet for a bit, had some unavoidable family matters to handle. I’m back now and this channel is going FULL POWER with solid signals πŸ”₯πŸ“ˆ If you muted the channel, unmute it now β€” we’re here to make serious money. Let’s get to work. πŸ’ͺπŸ“ˆ

❀7πŸ”₯2πŸ₯°2

15 Oct 2025, 01:06 UTCβ‰ˆ4,800 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026

πŸ‘€

❀8⚑3πŸ‘2πŸŽ‰1

13 Oct 2025, 07:47 UTCβ‰ˆ4,200 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

Choose 1 answer. I ...

  1. Miss your signal.79%
  2. Don't need it anymore.21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❀2πŸŽ‰1πŸ”₯1πŸ₯°1

13 Oct 2025, 07:17 UTCβ‰ˆ3,780 views11 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Who want to trade with me today?

❀5πŸ”₯3πŸŽ‰1πŸ‘1πŸ‘1

10 Oct 2025, 06:29 UTCβ‰ˆ3,810 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Hi.

❀9πŸ”₯5πŸ‘1πŸ‘1πŸ₯°1

9 Oct 2025, 12:22 UTCβ‰ˆ3,670 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Because it's already TP! Hehe 70pips sharp done. Enjoy! πŸ€‘

❀6πŸ”₯2

9 Oct 2025, 12:05 UTCβ‰ˆ2,660 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Hey? Did you guys entry with me? πŸ‘€

❀4πŸ”₯3πŸ‘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @charliesharpentry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jan 2026, 07:18 UTCAnonymous Poll40 voters

Are you READY for the next move? πŸ“ˆπŸ’°

  1. βœ… YES, let’s go83%
  2. ⏳ Not yet23%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Oct 2025, 07:47 UTCAnonymous Poll113 voters

Choose 1 answer. I ...

  1. Miss your signal.79%
  2. Don't need it anymore.21%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 October 2025 to 20 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

πŸ”πŸ— 𝐅𝐗 ⏱️
@maoyifx Β· 30,495
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 76 here β€” alongside 75 others β€” read 6 September 2026
Vincent Gold Trader
@vincentgoldtrader Β· 57,713
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 83 here β€” alongside 82 others β€” read 24 August 2026
Orient FX
@orientfx123 Β· 49,676
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 79 here β€” alongside 78 others β€” read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 3 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œCharlie Sharp Entry πŸ“Šβ€ (@charliesharpentry), 2,297 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/charliesharpentry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.