Little time line share here, for those that do onchain research. https://x.com/bandosei/status/2085333241863532633?s=46&t=MZlWiGqzYAJXteMqGnuzGw

Channel
ieatwaffles
@chartsareretarded
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
912subscribers
+62 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003325372010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chartsareretarded |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chartsareretarded |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 912 | +38 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 874 | +25 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 849 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 852 | +8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:27 | 844 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 850 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:59 | 850 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
15 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 53.3% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Very degen listing right here, i think optical names have been very volatile recently. https://x.com/tradexyz/status/2085392240361267628?s=46&t=MZlWiGqzYAJXteMqGnuzGw
One could also argue that the current price action is also affected by the macro situation but to me thats a stretch. Theres too much to yap about but we just follow headlines anyhow, and rate their worth / impact.
❤4
Bitcoin is sitting at a historic low volatility regime, this indicates more violent price action to come - larger moves. Such metrics dont dictate direction so dont ask me about that, its pure regime read. BTC HV Chart Clarity act is somehow all the yap from these news sources which to me is quite manipulative, it was already known that the senate hasn’t added it to its calendar due to time constraints, votings re…
I pretty much closed out at the top so im not complaining, in theory i traded my plan so thats the success here but its good to remember that its very likely no amount of bull posting and such justifies its valuation + unlocks en route. https://x.com/wafxles/status/2084718368578273699?s=20
Tbh one could argue that this rip was a better add for shorts rather than longs, tho its early to say. SPCX is not something id valuate based on its earnings at least for now.
Thats my long trade p much done
❤4👍1
*SPACEX 2Q REV. $7.8B, EST. $6.81B $SPCX
https://x.com/zerohedge/status/2084618721079734585?s=46&t=MZlWiGqzYAJXteMqGnuzGw
😈2
Photo, posted without a caption
You can reserve a handle for your wallet
https://cloudflare.pay/
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chartsareretarded. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ieatwaffles” (@chartsareretarded), 912 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chartsareretarded.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.