Chasium | Game No. 2 Ended ✔️ The number was: 65 The total amount sent to the wallet was: $9 The winner is @jimmyporn who sent $4 🥇
🔥3

Channel
@chasium
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003048335052 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chasium |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 1 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chasium |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 54 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 54 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 1 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 61.9% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 38.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 3 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Chasium | Game No. 2 Ended ✔️ The number was: 65 The total amount sent to the wallet was: $9 The winner is @jimmyporn who sent $4 🥇
🔥3
Deposit time has ended, please wait patiently until all transactions are processed and confirmed. We will announce the winner shortly. 🔔
❤1
Chasium | Game No. 2💵 GuessPot - Random number is chosen, the one who sends the closest amount to that number takes it all DM @ayozan with “Playing” to get in the queue list for getting added to a group Available Groups: 1x with 4 Players & Number Interval: 0-100 Please check our Terms Of Service by clicking on the pinned message 📌
New game at 5 reacts.
❤6🔥5
Chasium | Game No. 1 Ended ✔️ The number was: 36 The total amount sent to the wallet was: $7.68 The winner is @xiarg who sent $3.00🥇
❤6
Deposit time has ended, please wait patiently until all transactions are processed and confirmed. We will announce the winner shortly. 🔔
Chasium | Game No. 1💵 GuessPot DM @ayozan with “Playing” to get in the queue list for getting added to a group Random number is chosen, the one who sends the closest amount to that number takes it all Available Groups: 1 with 4 Players Number Interval: 0-100 Please check our Terms Of Service by clicking on the pinned message 📌
Chasium | Terms Of Service ‼️ 1. Do not send less than the specified minimum. 2. Do not send flashed crypto. 3. Do not misrepresent the amount sent to the wallet. 4. Do not send funds to another wallet and claim that it was the one provided. 5. Do not forget to cover the network fee. (If you send $5, make sure you cover the network fee and it’s $5.01/5.02) 6. Sending money to the wallet after the deposit time h…
🤑 Chasium | #1 Com Game How to play ❓ 1. The host sends a message in the channel asking who wants to play 2. Groups of 2, 4, 6, 10 people are made 3. A random number is generated and saved with proof. (0-10, 0-50, 25-50, etc.) 4. Everyone sends an amount of money to the provided wallet . 5. The one who sent the closest amount to the generated number takes everything.
🎰 Chasium | #1 Com Game Easy game, big rewards. ➡️ We pick a random number when round starts. ➡️ The amount of money you send = The number you think we picked. ➡️ The one that guessed closest to the one we picked takes all the money. ⚡️ Fast rounds 🔗 Safe & Secure ✔️ Simple to play Everything runs manually, all within the channel/dms, no random bots/bs like that! Join and start winning: @chasium
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @chasium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,455,553 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chasium | #1 Com Game” (@chasium), 54 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chasium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.