Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЧБG

Channel

ЧБG

@chbge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,581subscribers

+3,346 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001438999340
TypeChannel
Username@chbge
DescriptionБлог о играх, железках, идиотах и не только!
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chbge

Growth

16,15819,70217,9307 August 2026 — 16,235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,235 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,228 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,218 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,203 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,235 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,277 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,276 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,272 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,264 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,263 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,243 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,230 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,211 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,197 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,182 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,158 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,241 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,702 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,599 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,595 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,606 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,581 subscribers19,5817 August 202631 August 2026
24 measurements spanning 24 days, net +3,346. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,626–20,234 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 13:5419,581-25
30 Aug 2026, 12:1619,606+11
29 Aug 2026, 11:2519,595-4
28 Aug 2026, 14:0419,599-103
27 Aug 2026, 12:4719,702+3,461
26 Aug 2026, 14:2316,241+83
25 Aug 2026, 11:4816,158-24
24 Aug 2026, 12:4516,182-15
22 Aug 2026, 18:5216,197-14
21 Aug 2026, 10:2916,211-19
20 Aug 2026, 12:0316,230-13
19 Aug 2026, 09:2416,243-9
18 Aug 2026, 12:4916,252-11
17 Aug 2026, 10:1816,263-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:2816,264-8
14 Aug 2026, 09:1516,272-4
12 Aug 2026, 23:1216,276-1
12 Aug 2026, 02:4216,277+42
11 Aug 2026, 06:0516,235+32
10 Aug 2026, 05:5416,203first reading

Engagement

77 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.2%
avg views ÷ 19,581 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,580
73 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 77 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held77 (31 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total188,020
Reactions total5,587
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken31 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,310
Videos
478
Links
360

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 31 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 46s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,727 reactions across 77 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,62028.3%
👍1,39524.4%
🤣98717.2%
❤‍🔥2854.98%
🔥2043.56%
🥰1853.23%
😭1562.72%
🤡1372.39%
🍾1282.24%
😁1101.92%
👀931.62%
🐳831.45%
🕊781.36%
🌚721.26%
💅240.419%
🫡240.419%
🤓180.314%
🤔180.314%
🤯170.297%
👎140.244%
21 further kinds791.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,727 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
130
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 77 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chbge. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 13:44 UTC414 views79 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Клоунов придется запретить, мне не нравится

🤡60👍6😭54🐳2💅1🥰1

31 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC676 views81 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Ну в целом. я не доволен! 2 место ролик занял. Какого хуя спрашивается не первое? Евген за него кровь со слезами проливал и даже в рот брать пришлось, а вы твари... Мотивацией заряжен на 3 число, пойти заснять рекламный слоп по другой игре! Всем удачи, и всем пока

🤡648🌭4🤣4🐳1

30 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC≈1,410 views213 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤣1995🐳3🥰3👀1🔥1🤡1

30 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,550 views166 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Разгребся с делами, и провел генеральную уборку в кабинете. И вот наконец как только освободились руки, заказал эту пушечку. Огромное спасибо Александру капитошке за донат в 25к р. Я до сих пор в ахуе. Саня это кстати тот человек что закидал Квантума деньгами ради серии по расту. Теперь его стараниями у меня есть один из самых дорогих бандлов по Коносубе. ВЕЛИКИЕ ВЕЩИ ДЕЛАЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕК. Распаковвку такой вещи нужно б

152👍5❤‍🔥4🐳1👀1🤗1🤡1😇1

30 Aug 2026, 13:52 UTC≈1,550 views166 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Все, я на базе. Не люблю эти сезонные переезды

152❤‍🔥3👍3🥰2🐳1👀1💯1🔥1

29 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈2,060 views98 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026

ЧТОООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООО

64🍾24🐳2👀2❤‍🔥1🌭1🍌1💩1

29 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈2,040 views93 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026

АХУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУУй

🔥60🍾213🥰3❤‍🔥2🐳2👀1😎1

29 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,040 views144 reactions1 Starread 31 August 2026
Photo

ЧАВО БЛЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯЯ ЧТООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООООО

🔥80🍾29🤯166🐳4❤‍🔥2🎉2😇2

29 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,970 views53 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

А какой смысл играть в игры по чужим гайдам, обзорам, метам? Разве не интереснее познавать игру самому?

35👍12🐳21🌭1👀1🥰1

28 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC≈2,360 views192 reactions21 Starsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Пацаны, я как бы не на что не намекаю но у меня скоро день рождения. Воооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооооот ≽^•⩊•^≼

🤣1748🫡5👀2👍1🤡1😁1

28 Aug 2026, 09:08 UTC≈2,090 views53 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Пей пиво на заре Пей пиво перед сном Пей пиво на траве Пей пиво за столом Пей пиво натощак Пей пиво со хмеля Пей пиво просто так ManOR_GroM👤 ПЕС ПИВОВАР, да это игра про оЛЛадя

🍾42👍541👀1

27 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC≈2,170 views34 reactionsread 31 August 2026

Главное что бы NUTTERTOOLS работал, а то без него играть не интересно

🤣26👍4😁2🐳1👀1

Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @chbge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 181,854 of 1,629,518 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CheZee
@papachez_official · 155,569
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 August 2026
ПО ФАКТУ
@pfrust · 48,609
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 26 August 2026
Держи Дверь
@dergidver · 236,167
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
MAGIC RUST
@magicrust · 106,931
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЧБG” (@chbge), 19,581 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chbge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.