Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Косметика и макияж | Che Beauty

Channel

Косметика и макияж | Che Beauty

@che_beauty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

18,777subscribers

-3,018 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002990743645
TypeChannel
Username@che_beauty
Description💞 Che Beauty — Косметика, макияж, бьюти и уход за собой. Обзоры косметики, skincare, уход за кожей, beauty-находки, скидки и новинки В закрепе наша личная разработка ИИ бьюти-стилист! По всем вопросам: @bafomet6
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held45
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/che_beauty

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,77721,79520,28626 August 2026 — 21,795 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,795 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,755 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,713 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,657 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,614 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,588 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,541 subscribers3 September 2026 — 21,506 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,459 subscribers7 September 2026 — 21,340 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21,227 subscribers12 September 2026 — 21,142 subscribers14 September 2026 — 21,069 subscribers15 September 2026 — 21,008 subscribers17 September 2026 — 20,935 subscribers29 September 2026 — 20,564 subscribers5 October 2026 — 19,920 subscribers9 October 2026 — 19,790 subscribers13 October 2026 — 19,659 subscribers14 October 2026 — 19,622 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,602 subscribers16 October 2026 — 19,574 subscribers17 October 2026 — 19,543 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,494 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,465 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,437 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,417 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,377 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,343 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,303 subscribers26 October 2026 — 19,254 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,224 subscribers28 October 2026 — 19,190 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,142 subscribers30 October 2026 — 19,102 subscribers31 October 2026 — 19,077 subscribers1 November 2026 — 19,034 subscribers2 November 2026 — 19,002 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,952 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,905 subscribers5 November 2026 — 18,880 subscribers6 November 2026 — 18,855 subscribers7 November 2026 — 18,817 subscribers8 November 2026 — 18,777 subscribers26 August 20268 November 2026
45 measurements spanning 74 days, net -3,018. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,324–22,248 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 45
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 15:4918,777-40
7 Nov 2026, 11:5618,817-38
6 Nov 2026, 10:1018,855-25
5 Nov 2026, 10:3718,880-25
4 Nov 2026, 12:2018,905-47
3 Nov 2026, 09:4118,952-50
2 Nov 2026, 06:5919,002-32
1 Nov 2026, 03:4019,034-43
31 Oct 2026, 06:0119,077-25
30 Oct 2026, 08:3919,102-40
29 Oct 2026, 08:0619,142-48
28 Oct 2026, 03:1919,190-34
27 Oct 2026, 04:3019,224-30
26 Oct 2026, 04:2919,254-49
25 Oct 2026, 07:3919,303-40
24 Oct 2026, 05:1019,343-34
23 Oct 2026, 04:3019,377-40
22 Oct 2026, 03:1919,417-20
20 Oct 2026, 21:5819,437-28
19 Oct 2026, 23:2819,465first reading

Engagement

68 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.15%
avg views ÷ 18,777 subscribers
Avg views / post
592
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 68 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held68 (24 August 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total13,013
Reactions total618
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,710
Videos
≈375
Links
≈1,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 40s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,953 reactions across 68 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤96249.3%
❤‍🔥36718.8%
💋26513.6%
💅1738.86%
🕊1346.86%
😭522.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 68 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,953 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC161 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🪷Минималистичная прическа🪷🪷 🪷че по бьюти

❤‍🔥4❤2

8 Nov 2026, 11:02 UTC244 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Сохраняй🛍🛍🛍 че по бьюти

❤12❤‍🔥2💅2

8 Nov 2026, 08:04 UTC303 views12 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

🩷Как уменьшить отечность лица утром?🩷 Поможет этот массаж🩷🩷🩷 че по бьюти

❤9🕊2❤‍🔥1

6 Nov 2026, 13:36 UTC515 views14 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💗💗💗💗💗💗 💗 💗💗💗💗💗💗💗 че по бьюти

❤11❤‍🔥3

6 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC538 views59 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🧸А кто ты???🧸 1-❤️ 2-💅🏻 3-💋 4-🕊️ че по бьюти

💋29💅14❤9🕊7

5 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC531 views25 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🌝КАК легко узнать свой цветотип???🌚 че по бьюти

❤20🕊3❤‍🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC563 views17 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💗💗💗🌷🌷🌺 Попробуй соблюдать хотя бы половину, уже тогда станет заметен эффект🧸 че по бьюти

❤11❤‍🔥3🕊3

3 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC758 views11 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💙А что, если твоя самая красивая черта – это твоя внутренняя сила? 💙Мы привыкли говорить о красоте: подбирать оттенки помады, искать идеальную прическу, вдохновляться образами героинь… 🌺Но представь мир, где красота может быть магией, сила – проклятием, а любовь – самым опасным испытанием… 🌺Знакомьтесь 🌺 «Пепел Севера. Четыре земли» - фэнтези Александры Гото, в котором есть все для тех, кто любит загадочные миры, …

❤6❤‍🔥3🕊2

2 Nov 2026, 13:35 UTC616 views19 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🫖🍦🐶А что у тебя совпадает и отличается?🛍☎📷 че по бьюти

❤15❤‍🔥4

2 Nov 2026, 10:02 UTC619 views26 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 че по бьюти

❤‍🔥16🕊6💋3❤1

2 Nov 2026, 07:04 UTC601 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

💋5 вещей, которые нужно сделать в ноябре💋 📎Устроить домашний SPA-вечер 🛁 Маска для волос, скраб для тела, любимый крем и расслабляющая музыка. Пусть хотя бы один вечер будет только вашим. 📎Обновить уход за кожей ✨ С наступлением холодов добавьте больше увлажнения и питания, не забывайте про губы и руки. 📎Попробовать новый образ 💄 Новый оттенок помады, непривычная укладка или маникюр — иногда даже маленькие перемены …

💅7❤5❤‍🔥2💋2

31 Oct 2026, 13:02 UTC761 views27 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

❤️❤️❤️Ох уж эти вампирские принты ❤️❤️❤️ че по бьюти

❤24❤‍🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @che_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @che_beauty as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
28 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
28 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Косметика и макияж | Che Beauty” (@che_beauty), 18,777 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/che_beauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.