Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@chekak1 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
@maryvismut held 30 August 2026 – 30 August 2026
Growth
6 measurements spanning 20 days, net +371. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 283–766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 03:15
710
+7
9 Sept 2026, 17:38
703
+4
7 Sept 2026, 09:23
699
no change
7 Sept 2026, 07:47
699
+319
30 Aug 2026, 21:06
380
+41
30 Aug 2026, 04:00
339
first reading
Engagement
37 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
285.9%
avg views ÷ 710 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,030
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 37 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held
37 (25 August 2026 – 6 September 2026)
Views total
52,786
Reactions total
866
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 38s
Average length
40s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,049 reactions across 37 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
247
23.5%
❤
242
23.1%
😁
199
19.0%
🔥
107
10.2%
😱
41
3.91%
🤬
31
2.96%
😢
24
2.29%
🙏
23
2.19%
💔
20
1.91%
🥰
15
1.43%
❤🔥
14
1.33%
🍓
13
1.24%
👍
12
1.14%
🦄
7
0.667%
🎉
6
0.572%
💅
6
0.572%
🤝
6
0.572%
⚡
5
0.477%
🕊
5
0.477%
🌚
4
0.381%
9 further kinds
22
2.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,049 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот они — две уставшие девчонки, уже мысленно распланировавшие свой день и совершенно ни о чём не подозревающие.
Только сейчас меня немного отпустило. До этого момента я не могла ни о чём думать, кроме того, какими путями можно решить этот вопрос, и бесконечных подсчётов убытков.
Итог такой: дай бог здоровья другу Алины, который составил нам претензию, позвонил в полицию и вообще помогал со всем этим разбираться. …
Первый раз шутка о том, что мы с Алиной — один человек, появилась ещё в прошлую поездку.
Кажется, в самолёте нам принесли плед и маску для сна… одну на двоих. Посмеялись, что у кого-то из нас ши-зо-фре-ни-я. И нет тут никакой Алины или Маши. Просто психика в поездке пытается пережить то, что происходит.
Посмеялись один раз. Потом какой-то гид Алину Марией называет. Потом другой меня Алиной.
Ну, посмеялись второй.
…
Так как мой английский оставляет желать лучшего, иногда захожу в приложения пообщаться с иностранцами и потренировать язык.
Обычно там молодые ребята: хобби, работа, путешествия, планы на жизнь.
И тут среди анкет мне встретился этот бриллиант.
Как будто папа записал тебя к репетитору по английскому, а на первом занятии ты обнаруживаешь дядю Валеру, который вчера с батей ловил карасей.
Валерий любит разговаривать …
Вечер абсурда
В казино приезжает принц Эсватини, чтобы попрощаться с Алиной. Из окна чёрного «Крузака» прощается с ней. Спрашивает, хочет ли она, чтобы он остался… (максимально драматично)
Алина:
— Не знаю. Не, ну если хочешь — оставайся, конечно.
(Он явно планировал, что она ответит иначе.)
Но влажные фантазии принцев мы на корню обрубаем.
Пауза. Принц в неловком недоумении, но решает идти по заранее придуманно…
Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @chekak1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“❓ЧёКак❓” (@chekak1), 710 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chekak1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.