Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дядя Самовар

Channel

Дядя Самовар

@chel_samovar

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,784subscribers

-410 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001611751047
TypeChannel
Username@chel_samovar
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chel_samovar

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,78416,47416,1297 August 2026 — 16,194 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,213 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,252 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,305 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,376 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,427 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,474 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,462 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,453 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,439 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,412 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,395 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,367 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,321 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,296 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,194 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,175 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,170 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,145 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,109 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,094 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,078 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,057 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,005 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,969 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,944 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,886 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,847 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,840 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,816 subscribers17 September 2026 — 15,803 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,784 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -410. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,681–16,578 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:3815,784-19
17 Sept 2026, 00:5915,803-13
14 Sept 2026, 23:2015,816-24
13 Sept 2026, 06:4115,840-7
11 Sept 2026, 10:1615,847-39
8 Sept 2026, 19:4015,886-58
5 Sept 2026, 10:2015,944-25
3 Sept 2026, 09:4715,969-36
2 Sept 2026, 04:3616,005-52
1 Sept 2026, 07:1516,057-21
31 Aug 2026, 07:2716,078-16
30 Aug 2026, 04:5516,094-15
29 Aug 2026, 07:4316,109-36
28 Aug 2026, 04:1216,145-25
27 Aug 2026, 03:3716,170-5
26 Aug 2026, 00:0516,175-19
24 Aug 2026, 23:1816,194-102
23 Aug 2026, 11:3916,296-25
22 Aug 2026, 00:1716,321-46
20 Aug 2026, 18:0516,367first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.1%
avg views ÷ 15,784 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,060
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.878%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held56 (24 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total40,320
Reactions total354
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 49s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,069 reactions across 55 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,03242.9%
🤣99614.1%
🤡93913.3%
😭4496.35%
👍4125.83%
😁3524.98%
👎1211.71%
🫡1191.68%
🤯1141.61%
😢801.13%
❤‍🔥630.891%
🔥490.693%
😨490.693%
🤔410.58%
🌭290.41%
🥱250.354%
💘240.34%
🗿240.34%
🦄170.24%
👏160.226%
24 further kinds1181.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,069 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,017
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 55 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
681
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chel_samovar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:20 UTC≈5,780 views104 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Как это вообще возможно? Слева клиент 2010-го. Справа нынешняя Дота. Каким вообще образом, в сырой альфе на древнем движке Source 1, вода и отражение в ней выглядит как в современных играх с трассировкой лучей? А в современной Доте вода вообще не выглядит как вода и отражений буквально нет. Может кто-то это объяснить? Почему для таких отражений сейчас нужна топовая видеокарта? Почему на новом движке Source 2 таких

70😁19🤡10👍5

1 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC≈7,300 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вот все герои из последней версии 2010-го. Попробуйте угадать кто есть кто. Кто хочет сам попробовать, вот ссылка на скачку. Там сразу несколько клиентов разной степени старости. Самые первый качать не советую, он слишком старый. Даже консольные команды толком не работают. Качайте лучше 883_6. Это самая стабильная версия. По управлению и командам: ё - консоль (иногда нужно прописать в параметрах запуска, если не вк

50🔥7❤‍🔥4🤡4👍2👻1

1 Sept 2026, 13:55 UTC≈7,320 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вообще удивительная вещь на самом деле произошла Если вы хоть немного следите за новостями, то знаете, что на днях был слит огромный архив всего стима с 2010 по 2013-й. Т.е были слиты все игры, которые на тот момент были в Стиме. Причем даже те, которые были в закрытом доступе или просто очень ранние билды известных всем игр. Это настолько ценная находка для датамайнеров и контентмейкеров, что просто словами не пере

61🔥5🤡3🤔2🤯1

1 Sept 2026, 13:46 UTC≈7,320 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026

⚡ЭТА ВЕРСИЯ ДОТЫ СТАРШЕ МОИХ ЗРИТЕЛЕЙ⚡ https://youtu.be/tSShWwZAuos

🌭9🔥3🤡3😡1

28 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC≈12,600 views94 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚡Valve наконец-то подсчитали очки фэнтези⚡ Делюсь своим результатом. Мейн акк: 26090 очков | 99 процентиль Вумен акк: 23895 очков | 97 процентиль Твинк акк: 20877 очков | 95 процентиль Результатом в целом доволен. Печалит лишь то, что нет разницы в наградах между 95-м и 99-м процентилем. Хотя с точки зрения очков разница прям ощутимая. Т.е на твинк я ставил прям максимально авантюрное говно и все равно получил тоже

63😢22🌭5❤‍🔥2🎅1👎1

23 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈18,300 views326 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Вообще тот факт, что нам не назвали место проведения следующего The International 2027 заставляет задуматься о Саратове том, что это вообще может быть последний Инт в истории. Это конечно не 100%, но просто до этого Вэлв всегда называла новую локацию. А тут вообще тишина. Ну и момент с короткометражками имел какой-то прощательный вайб. Что думаете?

190🫡87😢26🤡13🤣4🤔3🕊1🤩1

23 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈15,200 views315 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Наверное не стоило включать звук из кабинок раньше времени...

186😁84🤡22🔥10🤣5❤‍🔥3👍1👏1

23 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC≈15,000 views408 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ну и да, никаких анонсов не было. И как я понял никогда больше не будет. Теперь инт - это чисто турнир. Ничего кроме игр тут теперь не будет. И это грустно 😣

😭331🫡2118😢12🗿10👎6🤡6👍1

23 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC≈14,600 views230 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Боже, дайте Нуну хотя бы потрогать аегис

159😁34😭22👎7💘6🗿1🤡1

23 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈14,400 views128 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ну яж говорил

🤡8635😡6🎄1

23 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈14,400 views224 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Походу все таки Спирит заберут инт. Тупо потому что пятая карта выпала на их победу (они побеждают по очереди).

131🤡53🤣15🤔8👎6😢6🤷‍♂3🕊1

23 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC≈13,800 views28 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Кто заберет инт?

  1. Team Spirit54%
  2. Team Vision51%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍174👎4🌭2🐳1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @chel_samovar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@chel_samovar edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTCAnonymous Poll4,670 voters approx.

Кто заберет инт?

  1. Team Spirit54%
  2. Team Vision51%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

это же sereGGa!
@sereggadota · 56,270
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
Meeponegeroi
@meeponegero1tg · 81,781
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
СВИТ
@Sweetsosquahub · 143,287
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
finargot
@finargoth · 140,271
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дядя Самовар” (@chel_samovar), 15,784 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chel_samovar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.