Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for челло будды

Channel

челло будды

@chellobuddhy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

478subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001846925081
TypeChannel
Username@chellobuddhy
Created24 April 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chellobuddhy

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

478481479.57 August 2026 — 481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 481 subscribers22 August 2026 — 480 subscribers29 August 2026 — 481 subscribers7 September 2026 — 480 subscribers15 September 2026 — 478 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 39 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 478–481 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 11:40478-2
7 Sept 2026, 22:18480-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:23481+1
22 Aug 2026, 16:14480-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:28481no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:46481first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

241 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7832.4%
😁6125.3%
💯2711.2%
🤣135.39%
🙏124.98%
😢104.15%
🎅93.73%
🔥93.73%
👏72.90%
👍52.07%
🤓41.66%
🌚31.24%
👻20.83%
😈10.415%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC221 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

мне нравится, что концепция судной ночи так понравилась голливудским авторам, что они спешат перетянуть её из хоррора во все возможные прочие жанры, не осознавая безумных политических импликаций своих идей уже был когда-то х/ф the binge, стоунерская пародия про "судная ночь, но вместо всех преступлений только алкоголь и наркотики разрешены 12 часов в году" теперь вот в прокат выходит романтическая комедия про "судн

😁71

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC259 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

somebody get these CHILD PREDATORS out of here!

🔥94😁2😈1

4 Aug 2026, 20:34 UTC289 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

редкий случай книжной киноадаптации, у которой будет настолько больше шансов оказаться хорошей и успешной, насколько дальше она готова будет отойти от исходного материала

8

4 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC312 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

more like ai degenerated sequences, am i right

10

3 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC339 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

на самом деле трудно до сих пор уложить в голове происходящее, это какое-то абсолютное безумие у всех различных рекордсменов прошлого - аватар, эндгейм, седьмой эпизод, etc - всегда была одна и та же история: огромный ажиотаж на протяжении долгого времени до премьеры, который приводил к историческим цифрам. человек-паук же выстрелил словно из ниоткуда - ещё месяц назад любого, кто прогнозировал бы фильму самый больш

16

3 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC308 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

в каждом из четырёх самых больших открывающих выходных в истории американского проката поучаствовал один актёр... джейкоб баталон, сео наших сердец

5

2 Aug 2026, 21:57 UTC383 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

вот так сходу тяжело определить самую значимую адаптацию

😁141

1 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC379 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

если барби потеряет грету гервиг и основных актёров, остаётся только один человек, достаточно близкий к успеху оригинального фильма, чтобы быть способным подобрать знамя франшизы барби 2 должен снять сэр кристофер нолан

🙏12🎅93👻2

31 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC373 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

это я читаю все свежие бокс-офисные апдейты по новому человеку-пауку, прогнозы сборов которого ежечасно растут исключительно вверх в геометрической прогрессии

8🤓4

30 Jul 2026, 18:02 UTC445 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

это что ещё за безобразие?! женские воук-ребуты уже и до святого добрались - до ларса и настоящей девушки! а ну-ка быстро руки прочь от истинно мужского дела - депрессии из-за одиночества, вызванного хронической неспособностью построить здоровые отношения, основанные на доверии и взаимопонимании! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVAki9SGrlg

😁6👍32

30 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC382 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026

х/ф fall aka вышка породил своим существованием, возможно, самую гениальную идею для франшизы за всю историю кинематографа дело тут в чём, оригинальное кино 2022 года рассказывало про двух скалолазок, муж одной из которых погиб во время одногоиз восхождений. чтобы почтить его память и помочь справиться с горем, девушки решают залезть на 600-метровую заброшенную телебашню и развеять с вершины его прах - не самый очев

🤣13👏72

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @chellobuddhy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“челло будды” (@chellobuddhy), 478 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chellobuddhy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.