
Channel
Parishram chemistry
@chemistry_parishram
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,135subscribers
-164 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002133660115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chemistry_parishram |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chemistry_parishram |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 3,135 | -23 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 3,158 | -19 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:55 | 3,177 | -23 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:17 | 3,200 | no change |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:22 | 3,200 | -14 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:24 | 3,214 | -25 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 3,239 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 3,245 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 3,255 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 3,263 | -16 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 3,279 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 04:43 | 3,298 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 3,299 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Sourabhrainaofficial · 73,592
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 19 August 2026
@Bharat_Panchal_Sir · 145,123
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 12 August 2026
@AbhisheksahusirPhysics · 170,943
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
@pwncertwallah · 240,762
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 11 August 2026
@Lakshya_NEET_Lectures_2027_PW · 45,479
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 5 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Parishram chemistry” (@chemistry_parishram), 3,135 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemistry_parishram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.