8 measurements spanning 24 days, net +611. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,507–7,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Sept 2026, 03:37
7,210
+118
6 Sept 2026, 04:22
7,092
+66
1 Sept 2026, 16:25
7,026
-88
29 Aug 2026, 11:08
7,114
+161
26 Aug 2026, 01:48
6,953
+196
22 Aug 2026, 20:37
6,757
+133
19 Aug 2026, 07:54
6,624
+25
18 Aug 2026, 10:15
6,599
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.99%
avg views ÷ 7,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
360
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held
20 (16 August 2026 – 20 August 2026)
Views total
7,194
Reactions total
277
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
277 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
88
31.8%
💋
57
20.6%
💘
49
17.7%
❤🔥
35
12.6%
custom 5443025785231252771
18
6.50%
😍
17
6.14%
🙏
8
2.89%
💅
5
1.81%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 277 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎀РАЗБОР ОШИБОК - ТВОЙ РОСТ🎀
Думаете, решите как можно больше вариантов и все, сразу высокие баллы?
Мало просто решить вариант. Обязательно нужно разобрать:
✅ свои слабые места
✅ понять, почему столкнулись с этой ошибкой, чтобы в дальнейшем стараться избегать их
💋Ошибки - твой залог к успеху!
На них мы учимся, чтобы в следующий раз не ошибиться!
✅Итог: разобрали ошибку ➡️ меньше путаетесь ➡️ выше балл
Со своими…
ЗАДНЯЯ ПАРТА, ПОДЪЁЁЁЁМ! 📢
Если вы ещё не слышали — у нас тут намечается кое-что важное 🙂
Повторяем для тех, кто пропустил важное объявление!
❤️28 августа в 18:00 встречаемся всем классом на стриме «Урок для зумера»
В этот раз у доски будут Вова Информатик и Лиза Греф, а компанию им составит Максим Лутчак. Поговорим о самом важном перед стартом учебного года:
— с чего начать подготовку, если хочешь высокий балл
…
А Я ПРИБЕРЕГЛА ДЛЯ ВАС ЕЩЕ КОЕ-ЧТО... 🌹
Самый лучший подарок себе - уверенность в своей подготовке к экзаменам, а значит и в высоких баллах
А сейчас как раз действует одно из самых выгодных предложений для моих булочек:
〰️Мы выделяем 400 мест по
〰️крышесносным условиям!
🤩1000 ₽ на первый месяц к любому тарифу
🤩план подготовки на год
🤩курс по базовой математике в подарок
🤩курс по ИС в подарок
А еще: пригласи дру…
ПРЕДПОСЛЕДНИЙ 7 ВЕБ ЛЕТНЕЙ ШКОЛЫ УЖЕ СЕГОДНЯ!
🐚На вебинаре мы с вами разберем ПЛАН подготовки на ГОД!
🐚Я расскажу, как же за этот год все успеть!
Когда?
❤️СЕГОДНЯ в 17:00 по мск
Где?
❤️по ссылочке ТУТ
Вебинар очень важный! Будем повышать эффективность тайм-менеджмента ❤️
Моя подружка любимая Лиза Греф и самый крутой информатик Вова расскажут вам о том, КАК ПОДГОТОВИТЬСЯ К ЕГЭ БЕЗ ПАНИКИ И ХАОСА? 🤯
28 августа в 18:00 проведём стрим «Урок для зумера»!
Известный блогер Максим Лутчак будет учеником наших любимых преподов!
На стриме разберём:
🤩как реально готовиться к ЕГЭ на высокий балл
🤩как понять свою текущую точку и определить, куда можно вырасти
🤩какие ошибки мешают получать 80–90…
НА ВЕБАХ ПОНЯТНО, А В ДОМАШКЕ ВОЗНИКАЮТ ВОПРОСЫ?💓
К сожалению, с этой проблемой сталкивается 90% учеников. Газ разбираться почему!🌷
❤️Во время просмотра кажется, что всё запомнилось
Но после вебинара часть информации уже забывается — особенно если сразу не закрепить её практикой
❤️Ошибки выявляются только при самостоятельном решении
Пока просто смотришь на решение, трудно понять, какие места ты на самом деле не ус…
🎥 Перед годовым курсом обсудила с экспертом ОГЭ/ЕГЭ по химии материалы, домашки, структуру курса и задала вопросы по проверке 2 части.
Она ответила на все мои тысячу вопросов, поэтому со свежими знаниями от эксперта бегу кошмарить методиста и добавлять вам информацию, которая поможет на экзамене 🤍
Договорились, что будут вебинары для 10 и 9 класса, где мои ученики смогут задать прямые вопросы и получить ответы от …
✴️ Шаг 82/150
РАЗЛОЖЕНИЕ НИТРАТОВ
🌷Каждый год эта тема встречается на экзамене как у ОГЭшек, так и ЕГЭшек🌷
Ни в коем случае нельзя забивать на нитраты и их разложение!
Газ смотреть теорию на карточке! 👋
❤️ сохраняй
Ламия Мамедова Химия EGEHub
#150шагов_егэхаб
Ну заслужили 😎
😧 Внимательно читаем файлик, обязательно сохраняем, скидываем другу
И газ разрывать ОГЭшку 26/27!!!!⭐️
егэшки, не плачем! Для вас тоже готовлю файл с планом подготовки в 10-11 классе)
🎵ЗАПИСЬ НА ОСНОВУ
А ВЫ ВООБЩЕ ЗНАЛИ, ЧТО У МЕНЯ НА КУРСЕ ЕСТЬ СВОИ ФИШКИ?
💖гадание на картах таро
(после вебинаров, в канале, в чате-Флудилке с учениками я часто делаю разные расклады своим ученикам)
💖веселая музыка в начале вебинаров для поднятия настроения учеников
💖шутки во время вебинаров делают атмосферу более расслабленной, и мои булочки не боятся ошибиться
Как итог: комфортная обстановка, которая помогает деткам отвлечься …
❤10❤🔥4💋4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chemlama. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Знаете, что такое демоверсия и почему ее все ждут?
Неее11%
Дааа68%
Слышала, но хз23%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Денис Марков | Химия ОГЭ 2027 | Умскул @chem_den · 94,844 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
Александра Лебедева | Химия ОГЭ 2027 | Между нами химия | Умскул @sasha_him · 49,628 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ламия Мамедова | Химия ЕГЭ и ОГЭ | ЕГЭХАБ” (@chemlama), 7,210 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemlama.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.