https://www.facebook.com/share/v/14jbc6Qtbyh/

Channel
Chemtrails+5G = Génocide + Écocide
@chemtrails5genocidecocide
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,316subscribers
+56 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001252107317 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chemtrails5genocidecocide |
| Created | 10 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chemtrails5genocidecocide |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 2,316 | +3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 2,313 | -9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 03:36 | 2,322 | +12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 2,310 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 2,302 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 2,298 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 2,290 | +12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 2,278 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 2,271 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 2,263 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 2,261 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 2,260 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 2,260 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 26m 46s
- Average length
- 5m 21s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Jamais dans toute l’histoire les circonstances n’ont été réunies contre le mal manifeste de la tyrannie et de l’esclavage, comme c’est le cas aujourd’hui. Les rêves qui brûlent dans les cœurs de milliards de personnes sont devenus de plus en plus forts au cours des millénaires. Nous devons aux enfants de ce monde une liberté de l’esclavage, que peu sont capables de concevoir. C’est l’ère la plus passionnante de toute…
Les commentaires des lecteurs : «Les superlatifs me manquent quant à l’importance de ce livre, surtout à notre époque. Pour une meilleure compréhension du contexte mondial. » « Un des livres les plus importants jamais écrit. Je suis si heureux de l’avoir dans ma librairie. » « Une explication complète de la manière dont le « mal » contrôle le monde. Quiconque s’intéresse aux questions de liberté en général devrait l…
[ livre audio ] La fin du mal sur terre, Jeremy Locke - YouTube https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NPSaJUXn9mo
Allez vous voter aux présidentielles ? Voter c'est-à-dire signer le registre que vous votiez nul blanc ou ce que vous voulez.
- Oui6%
- Non63%
- Je ne sais pas13%
- Je préfère ne pas me prononcer2%
- Je vote seulement au premier tour4%
- Je vote au deux tours7%
- Je milite pour le vote0%
- Je milite pour l'abstention8%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Quand des rayons bleus apparaissent en Gironde les nuits précédant les départs de feux tu te dit le climat est vraiment un artiste. 🤨 Crédit : @reality_revolt_
The sentient machine World is targeting and killing Human intelligence, the 5G Electromagnetic ⚡💥 microwave radiation ☢️ Directed Energy Alien 👽 Laser Weapon system cell death ☠️ towers are self aware like robots.
PARTAGES LA VIDÉO ‼️ https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1852XUVzV3/ ... https://t.me/Reinformation2point0/28844 ...
Poutine n’a même pas besoin d’attaquer la France, le gouvernement français s’en occupe très bien. https://t.me/lesloisacreesdelanature/12032
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chemtrails5genocidecocide. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Allez vous voter aux présidentielles ? Voter c'est-à-dire signer le registre que vous votiez nul blanc ou ce que vous voulez.
- Oui6%
- Non63%
- Je ne sais pas13%
- Je préfère ne pas me prononcer2%
- Je vote seulement au premier tour4%
- Je vote au deux tours7%
- Je milite pour le vote0%
- Je milite pour l'abstention8%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@lesloisacreesdelanature · 13,9529 postsLa Guerre Contre Le N.O.M
@laguerrecontrelenom · 5,9625 postsCamille Moscow 🇷🇺 ☦️
@Camille_Moscow · 21,0271 postRE-INFORMATION2.0 - Vouloir savoir & Oser dire... Patience & Persévérance ✊💛
@Reinformation2point0 · 7,3751 postBB 🐝Nous sommes l'Actualité positive 👇WWG1WGAll❤️
@beesbuzz · 9,1011 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@chemtrails5genocidecocide named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chemtrails+5G = Génocide + Écocide” (@chemtrails5genocidecocide), 2,316 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chemtrails5genocidecocide.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.