【🦄妹妹】:喵喵 【💰价格】:27 【🐺狼友】:xxxx 【😻长相评价】:8,小乖,御姐范,萝莉音,夹子 【🫦身材评价】:9,小矮矮大奶奶 【💋态度评价】:10,态度很好,一直聊天,不耍手机 【👅服务评价】:基本的服务。水多。 【😍个人发挥】:之前中大就去过,这次算回锅,妹妹今天一身黑,跟鞋黑丝搭配,看着就很骚。见面抱着啃,大蟒蛇。亲几下下边就湿了,提枪第一🔥,女上一直动,各种姿势配合,一🔥完了抱着你聊天,还不是挑逗,第二🔥也正常出。 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:值得回锅 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) https://t.me/DSXWWBY/20329

Channel
成都外围最真实报告(复活版)
@chengduloufengDSX
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
16,348subscribers
+3,798 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001585577228 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chengduloufengDSX |
| Description | 真诚待人,原2.5W频道被炸。 _____ @CDdashixiong Hello @Telegram My channel has not violated the rules and policy of using Telegram. |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 47 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chengduloufengDSX |
Topic
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:00 | 16,348 | +87 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 16,261 | +35 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 22:56 | 16,226 | +59 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:54 | 16,167 | +68 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 21:15 | 16,099 | +96 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 22:44 | 16,003 | +82 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:39 | 15,921 | +41 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:20 | 15,880 | +66 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 15,814 | +50 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 02:50 | 15,764 | +24 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:26 | 15,740 | +52 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:35 | 15,688 | +61 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:29 | 15,627 | +36 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:21 | 15,591 | +74 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 15,517 | +53 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 15,464 | +32 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 15,432 | +57 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 15,375 | +63 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 15,312 | +4 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 15,308 | first reading |
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 31.7%
- avg views ÷ 16,348 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,190
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (11 July 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 46,690 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 04:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 36
- Videos
- 14
- Links
- 480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
【🦄妹妹】:安夏 【💰价格】: 【🐺狼友】: 【😻长相评价】:8分 【🫦身材评价】:9分 【💋态度评价】:10分 【👅服务评价】:9分 【😍个人发挥】: 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:会回锅,情绪价值简直拉满了,很听话很耐操很反差的一个妹妹! 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) https://t.me/DSXWWBY/20040
【🦄妹妹】:果果 【💰价格】:中大+2 【🐺狼友】:cao人强 【😻长相评价】:8,样子底子是不错的,就是妆容和发型发色纯减分。 【🫦身材评价】:9,冷白皮,一字马功底还在,胸部大但是乳晕有点奇怪,接近肉色了。 【💋态度评价】:9没玩手机,聊天听指挥。 【👅服务评价】:7才入行,自己都笑没人教,问我怎么吸敏感容易出 【😍个人发挥】:开始女上很拉胯,问了才知道完全不会,还好听指挥,调整后稍微有点频率和力度,其实样子底子是可以的,交流聊天可以。 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:总体8分,否 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) https://t.me/DSXWWBY/19647
【妹妹】:小奈 【💰价格】:中大 【🐺狼友】: 【😻长相评价】:8分 真人跟照片8成相似,是一位青春可爱的妹妹 【🫦身材评价】:9分 我个人比较喜欢手幼脚幼的,妹妹完美符合我的要求。虽然胸前不算宏伟,但皮肤紧致幼嫩,三角地带毛不多,唇边光滑。唯一缺点就是皮肤偏黑。 【💋态度评价】:9分 妹妹是新手,刚进房间有一点内向,但相处一会儿后还是比较健谈。服务上不催不拖,换姿势也没有拒绝。但妹妹忘记带橡筋,怕头发沾湿,所以没有共浴。 【👅服务评价】:妹妹很敏感,反应真实。只是轻抚她的肌肤,身体已经微微颤抖,不停抖腰。妹妹十分紧,进入时感到下面不断收缩。一开始妹妹还因为害羞忍住不叫,但当妹妹习惯我的形状后,稍为加速,终于老实回应身体的感觉。换姿势也很配合,有读书时小女友的感觉。 【😍个人发挥】:妹妹配合度很高。 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:8.5分 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为…
报告模版 【🦄妹妹】:知甜 【💰价格】:中大+2 【🐺狼友】: 【😻长相评价】:小圆脸,不难看,也不是大美女,割的双眼皮,算耐看。 【🫦身材评价】:胸好像是垫过但是还挺好的,手感自然 【💋态度评价】:态度特别好,基本上有求必应 【👅服务评价】:服务很好,深喉没毛病,各种干呕 【😍个人发挥】:本来第一眼看见有点想退,但是气质还可以,就留下了,结果证明还真不错,各方面都挺不错的,除了毛有点多。希望人工白🐯早日成为行业标准。 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:可以打卡 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品)
报告模版 【🦄妹妹】:猫猫 【💰价格】:25 【🐺狼友】: 【😻长相评价】:8分清纯女大 【🫦身材评价】:细支结硕果 皮肤白净 【💋态度评价】:8 【👅服务评价】:8分 【😍个人发挥】:她体力不太好,但是身材颜值很s顶,服务也很好口的功夫了得 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:8.5值得回锅 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品)https://t.me/DSXWWBY/19538?single
【🦄妹妹】:猫芽 【💰价格】:中大 【🐺狼友】:欧文 【😻长相评价】:7.5分 和照片还是有一定差距的 【🫦身材评价】:9分 身材整体散发着青春的气息 胸不大但是很匀称 如果皮肤再白点就完美 【💋态度评价】:8分 妹妹累了没主动叫床 不过提要求了就会叫,叫得不错应该早点提要求。虽然没有主动聊天暖场,但我个人不是很介意这个 【👅服务评价】:看资料以为是那种特别主动奔放的类型,其实妹妹整体还是有点安静的(可能跟太累了有关系,妹妹说昨晚她没睡好)。服务过程整体没什么雷点,但也没太大惊喜。妹妹下面水不多,但昆感还是不错的,传教士体位和后入体位感觉都不错。最后就是妹妹抽烟,介意这个的算一个缺点 【😍个人发挥】:标准发挥 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:7.5分 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) https://t.me/DSXWWBY/19439
【妹子花名】:#依梦 【验证留名】:空白 【验证时间】:10月13日 【所在位置】:🏠 【修车水费】:中大+2 【身高身材】:170+ 【妹子年龄】: 20+ 【湿度紧度昆度评分】: 9分 【颜值评分】:9分 【身材评分】:9分 【态度机车评分】:10分,态度很好 【女友感评分】:10分,女友感很强 【服务评分】:9分 【时间管理评分】:10分,不催不拖 【性价比评分】:9分,短评 【综合评分】:9分,去掉一个最高分一个最低分,取平均分 【优点缺点】:基本没有缺点 【是否值得回锅】:是 【推荐程度】:9.5分/满分10.0分; 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 【个人发挥】:最对个人感觉的一位,有点小纹身,除非喜欢白皮肤或者服务控,不然特别推荐。 🤩已 验 好 评 😏成 都 在 线 🎶全 国 外 …
报告模版 【🦄妹妹】: 【💰价格】:中大 【🐺狼友】: 猫芽 【😻长相评价】:8分,我感觉还是挺乖的 【🫦身材评价】: 9分 特别好,蜂腰肥乳 【💋态度评价】:8分,有点冷吧,也没怎么笑但也不臭脸 【👅服务评价】:9分 口的一般,但是舌钉加分,确实很紧,真的很润,有点小乖。缺点是有点内向,不怎么热情吧,中场各玩各的 【😍个人发挥】: 9分 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:值得,可以再来一次了 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) https://t.me/DSXWWBY/15698 🤩已 验 好 评 😏成 都 在 线 🎶全 国 外 围 😍成 都 商 K 😘全 球 包 养 客服大师兄 @CDdashixiong 双向机器人 @chengdudsx_bot 防丢机器人 @dsxdh_bot
【🦄妹妹】: 宝宝 【💰价格】: 2.5k 【🐺狼友】: 天天開心 【😻长相评价】: 8 【🫦身材评价】: 10 【💋态度评价】: 10 【👅服务评价】: 8 【😍个人发挥】: 青春無敵,加上不成比例的巨乳,本來是想點個可可愛愛的小女生,結果脫衣服時覺得胸罩也太大了吧,一看真是巨乳,非常天賦異稟,四肢身材穠纖合度不胖不瘦,女上視覺效果超好,垂下來的奶子任意揉玩十分過癮 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】: 值得回鍋 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 🤩已 验 好 评 😏成 都 在 线 🎶全 国 外 围 😍成 都 商 K 😘全 球 包 养 客服大师兄 @CDdashixiong 双向机器人 @chengdudsx_bot 防丢机器人 @dsxdh_bot https://t.me/DSXWWBY/18
【🦄妹妹】:清欢 【💰价格】:自己问 【🐺狼友】:jn 【😻长相评价】:人照八分 【🫦身材评价】:不高但是有b,比较瘦 【💋态度评价】:10,该有的服务都有 【👅服务评价】:10 【😍个人发挥】:8 【🔥值得打卡/回锅】:从不回锅 妹妹刚来成都,是中吉混血的,中文很好,清单上的服务都有的,妹妹聊天比较开朗,做的时候也比较配合。懒狗安排稍微出了点问题,等人来的时候差点没睡着 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 🤩已 验 好 评 😏成 都 在 线 🎶全 国 外 围 😍成 都 商 K 😘全 球 包 养 客服大师兄 @CDdashixiong 双向机器人 @chengdudsx_bot 防丢机器人 @dsxdh_bot https://t.me/DSXWWBY/18844
【妹子花名】:绵绵冰 【验证留名】:xxx 【验证时间】:9.27 【所在位置】:上门 【修车水费】:20 【是否代聊】:是不是本人聊 【身高身材】:168,瘦,掌中宝 【妹子年龄】: 23 【湿度紧度】: 润 【颜值相似】:本人 【凶器罩杯】:b 【环境卫生】:房间整洁干净程度 【服务内容】:三件套 【机车行为】:无 【优点缺点】:态度好,不机车,性格也好 【性价比】:价格是否符合整体体验感受 9.5分/ /满分10.0分 【推荐程度】:9分/满分10.0分; 评分标准 6分为及格,7分为良品(考虑价格可以看一看),8分(值得价格并且建议体验),9分(实为该价位中少见的精品),10分(极品) 【个人发挥】:回锅,无需多言,如果不是特别吃大奶奶和服务那一挂的,中圈直接冲的水平,妹妹超 级配合,性格也很有意思 🤩已 验 好 评 😏成 都 在 线 🎶全 国 外 围 😍成 都 商 K 😘全…
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @chengduloufengDSX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@chengduloufengDSX edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 27 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 2 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @chengduloufengDSX as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 25 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 5 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“成都外围最真实报告(复活版)” (@chengduloufengDSX), 16,348 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chengduloufengDSX.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.