В стране в разгаре избирательная кампания — но реально электорально емкие инициативы озвучивает только никуда не избирающееся Министерство финансов 🥂
🔥12😁3⚡1🥰1

Channel
@cheresiz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
101subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003817881179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cheresiz |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 9 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cheresiz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:43 | 101 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 100 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 100 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
292 reactions across 19 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 82 | 28.1% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 16.8% | |
| 🤣 | 39 | 13.4% | |
| 👏 | 27 | 9.25% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 8.22% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 4.11% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 3.42% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 2.74% | |
| 😎 | 8 | 2.74% | |
| 🙈 | 8 | 2.74% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 2.05% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 🤷♀ | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.342% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.342% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.342% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.342% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.342% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В стране в разгаре избирательная кампания — но реально электорально емкие инициативы озвучивает только никуда не избирающееся Министерство финансов 🥂
🔥12😁3⚡1🥰1
И чтобы два раза не вставать – пара слов про ДЭГ и капелька эйджизма в отношении пожилых мужчин (к которым вскорости буду иметь честь принадлежать и сам) в материале для "Федерал Пресс" Кстати "Чтобы два раза не вставать" – отличный слоган и для самого ДЭГ. Элла Александровна, пользуйтесь на здоровье! 🙏
🔥8😁7🤣5💯2
А на что вы готовы ради контента Виталия Милонова? Тем временем сказал пару слов "Ведомостям" по поводу коллективного цифрового луддизма петербургских депутатов и кандидатов • Пока это выглядит как локальный тренд – частная цифровая эвакуация петербургских депутатов, считает политконсультант Игорь Чересиз. • До начала официальной агитации в СМИ с 22 августа есть только два основных варианта «дотянуться» до избират…
🤣6👍4
И читать, как мы сегодня поняли, тоже нельзя На то они и мессенджеры! 🫡🤐
🔥7👍3👏2😢1
Пушнина как традиционные российские ценности since века так примерно IX-X Такими темпами, глядишь, и путь "из варяг в греки" обратно пробьем. Хотя подождите... 🤔
🙈6🤔3🔥2👍1
Мне кажется, каждый из нас сейчас может так прокомментировать свои перспективы 🥳
😁14💔3🦄3
Иногда бывает сложно смотреть американские сериалы, потому что плохо чувствуешь контекст. Ну например, появляется там герой из Южной Каролины и ты нутром чуешь, что на наши деньги это примерно Саратов (простите, саратовцы, если вдруг чего), но точно сказать не можешь. Все вот эти маленькие отличия, как сказал классик Есть свои байки и стереотипы и про электоральное поведение жителей разных штатов. Ну вот, например –…
🔥4😁3💔1🤔1
Забавно, что с коллегой Константином Листратовым сказали про съезды партий примерно одно и то же – но по контексту материала "Федпресс" как будто бы и подискутировали 😎 Практически дискуссия о наполовину пустом съезде стакане 🥃
😁6👍2
Американские зумеры придумали слово "франкенштейнить". Это значит создавать себе идеального партнера, "склеивая" его из черт разных людей. Это теперь еще одна тревога психологически проработанных современных людей: если тебя не поабьюзят, не загостят и не разнарциссят, то точно пару разочков франкенштейнут • Если вы покупаете своему партнеру новую одежду, которая кардинально отличается от той, что он обычно носит, ч…
😁6❤3🔥2🤝1🤣1
Согласимся Чтобы пройти социологический опрос из 45-50 вопросов (был у меня такой опыт) – нужно обладать недюжинным терпением
😁7❤2💔2🙈2👀1
Рубрика «Мастерство бильд-редактора»
🤣8😁5🔥2
Главная новость из курилок съезда Единой России: участникам запретили проносить с собой вейпы.
🤣9👍4💔2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cheresiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КороЧЕ, Чересиз” (@cheresiz), 101 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cheresiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.