Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for чс лайфа

Channel

чс лайфа

@chernispisokkk

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004378204866
TypeChannel
Username@chernispisokkk
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 13 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chernispisokkk

Growth

929995.513 August 2026 — 98 subscribers13 August 2026 — 98 subscribers21 August 2026 — 97 subscribers29 August 2026 — 95 subscribers6 September 2026 — 92 subscribers14 September 2026 — 99 subscribers13 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 91–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 03:1899+7
6 Sept 2026, 17:1992-3
29 Aug 2026, 09:5395-2
21 Aug 2026, 12:2797-1
13 Aug 2026, 07:1698no change
13 Aug 2026, 07:0398first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥533.3%
🤬426.7%
320.0%
🥰213.3%
💘16.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC80 viewsread 13 August 2026

кстати про ее пост,в котором она пишет,что закрывала канал и запрещала копирование скорее всего пиздеж,ибо я пришла в игру во 2 туре и ни разу не видела,чтоб канал был закрыт или запрещен рассыл ну и в финале вообще хуй пойми для чего опрос переделывали 3 или 4 раза

Signed 𝒦•

3 Aug 2026, 12:13 UTC85 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

поговорим немного про данный канал и лайф,который там проводился я играла тут на 100 ⭐️ изначально с самого первого тура начались сливы игроков,на замечания и просьбы влд не реагировал,говорил ну мол я ничего не могу с этим сделать,в ответ на что я и другие люди начали ей писать,что нужно делать,дабы избежать слив,но она не послушала 🤷‍♀️ в итоге я кое как попала в финал,в финале влд рассыл ЗАПРЕТИЛ,но тем не менее в

Signed 𝒦•

28 Jul 2026, 19:47 UTC118 viewsread 13 August 2026

к слову, владелице карине, максимально похуй на жалобы.

Signed ᴀᴄя | 𝖒𝖊𝖋𝖋𝖋

28 Jul 2026, 19:45 UTC117 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/WhiskeyDogBlogGSP не думала что занесу в чс лайфов этот тгк, а точнее админа @llllkskk. лол, всего 3 тура и сразу финал, это что за бред? мне и до этого не нравилось что разрешают рассыл, бля, мы играем на качество или у кого пизже рассыл? это лайф свои, неужели вы не догоняете всю суть игры? к слову на мою просьбу, убрать 2 (меня) из игры и переделать опрос или хотя бы просто убрать фотку. мне ответи

❤‍🔥51💘1

Signed ᴀᴄя | 𝖒𝖊𝖋𝖋𝖋

23 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰2

Signed 𝒦•

23 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC620 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

старая тупая пизда обиделась на чужое мнение и начинает крыть хуями и впадать в приступ агрессии,желает еще неродившемуся ребенку смерти,адекватного ваще? @dina_nemera https://t.me/haedesolaf

🤬4

Signed 𝒦•

18 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC169 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

даже после разоблачения она не перестала отпираться 😐

Signed 𝒦•

18 Jul 2026, 15:29 UTC350 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

достаточно известный игрок с аусси «аки» который как оказалось вовсе не аки 🤔

Signed 𝒦•

13 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC239 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @malimomm

ну и много чего еще там писали и про меня и про полину,на что обиделись чувихи я хз в ответ на банальные вопросы полился шквал дерьма,переход на личности, «дети шлюх» 🙄

Signed 𝒦•

13 Jul 2026, 22:24 UTC248 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @malimommPhoto

значит рассказываю ситуацию тут проводился лайф на 100 звезд я играла и до 3 тура все было норм потом влд начал выебываться на тех,кто кидает скрины с видео,мол ахуели я задала вопрос,а в чем собственно проблема скринов из видео,на что ответ я не получила,видите ли она же не скринит для заданий и мы не должны я задала еще один вопрос «а как ты отличишь скрин от фото» «ну по пикселям видно» в ответ на что я кидаю свои

2

Signed 𝒦•

13 Jul 2026, 22:17 UTC203 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @malimommPhoto

✨✨✨✨ ✨✨✨✨ как бы я не хотела это делать,но я сделаю. суть всей ситуации видно на скриншотах,влд не умеет нормально проводить игры и по собственному желанию решает,кто уходит,а кто нет 🤗 https://t.me/berlogaoxotnika

Signed 𝒦•

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @chernispisokkk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“чс лайфа” (@chernispisokkk), 99 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chernispisokkk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.