Channel
@chernozm
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
499subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001106654327 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chernozm |
| Created | 28 February 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chernozm |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 499 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 498 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 497 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 497 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 19 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
241 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 124 | 51.5% | |
| 🤣 | 36 | 14.9% | |
| 🤡 | 23 | 9.54% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 7.88% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 3.73% | |
| 🤔 | 9 | 3.73% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 3.32% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.24% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.83% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 0.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 241 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 May 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А вот эти праздники, что область проводит в парке КЗТЗ в рамках фестиваля «Курск — сердце Черноземья» (что?) Они так реализуют федеральную субсидию на туризм, раз упоминают нацпроект? То есть праздник масштаба микрорайона должен привлекать туристов, правильно? Неудивительно, что у нас целый министр, ответственный за направление, считает главными туристическими событиями Масленицу на Полугоре, концерт на мемориале в…
🤡17💅3😁1
В рубрике «нейрослоп дня» сегодня — хуячечная Минкульт Курской области (снова) Не стихи про котиков, а настоящий индустриальный блокбастер
🤣12
А что теперь будет делать медиа с названием «Код Дурова*» а *внесен в перечень террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга тудэй
😁7
Ну хз
😁21
В Курске есть ансамбль с названием «ГЛАС НАВИ», но это обычный фолк, не NSBM и даже не pagan ambient......... (хотя с таким названием почему-то упоминается впервые, вообще фигурируют как фолк-дуэт «ЯвьдаНавь»)
❤3
А из слитых переписок Собчак мы узнали, что последняя (кажется) вменяемая федеральная редакция продолжает действовать даже несмотря на унизительную атмосферу бесконтрольно расширяющейся цензуры Непонятно, чего ещё все ожидали, честно говоря
👍9
Хорошо
😁7🤣5
В нерегулярной рубрике «нейрослоп дня» сегодня — кафе NBcake и студия «Йога 46» запоздало влетели в тренд на боди-хорроры
😁14🤔4👏2
Чтобы ПМЭФ не запомнился вершиной кринжа, было решено провести ПМЮФ. И позвать туда министерство юстиции.
😁10🤣6
Что-то новое
🤔5😁5🕊3
Губернатор сообщил, что на опрос о запрете вейпов в Курской области в ВК кто-то нагнал ботов Какая неожиданность, ведь все были уверены, что принимать решения на основе опросов в телеге и вкшечке — отличная идея, заодно и энгейджмент фармится Можно посмотреть, кто голосовал в прошлых опросах — например, о вокзале прибытия для «Курского соловья» На скриншоте ниже — ни одного живого человека)
😁7👍3
римские цифры и курские коммунисты — 1:0 Нам пишут: ...А ведь это могла быть IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII конференция...
😁12🤣3💅2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chernozm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чернозём” (@chernozm), 499 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chernozm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.