Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Чертос | 626 | камишечки аткрыты

Channel

Чертос | 626 | камишечки аткрыты

@chertos626

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001886294834
TypeChannel
Username@chertos626
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chertos626

Growth

1081121109 August 2026 — 108 subscribers9 August 2026 — 108 subscribers17 August 2026 — 109 subscribers25 August 2026 — 108 subscribers1 September 2026 — 111 subscribers19 September 2026 — 112 subscribers9 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 107–113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:40112+1
1 Sept 2026, 19:43111+3
25 Aug 2026, 01:48108-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:04109+1
9 Aug 2026, 19:21108no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:45108first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 15 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4630.9%
3825.5%
custom 53187833592943824992818.8%
🕊1610.7%
custom 5242695269161654729106.71%
💋74.70%
🦄42.68%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC16 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Рейджбайтить ахахв😎 Либо игнорировать хейт. У меня очень мало опыта связанного с хейтом и реагирую на него своеобразно. Я там распизделась чето, поэтому выделила😵‍💫 основную мысль, чтобы много читать не пришлось. Не уверена, насколько я могу дать дельный совет, потому что меня ваще не хейтили. Мне по-моему тока один раз всего пожелали смерти, пару раз сказали ливнуть с фд, и один раз выложили мои картинки и коммен

🔥4custom 52426952691616547293custom 53187833592943824992

8 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC23 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вы думаете, что я занимаюсь хуйней. Но вы не знаете, что в параллели я также рисую когкомальчиков.

💋5🔥3🕊2

8 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC24 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🤔Я не уверена что правильно поняла вопрос, поэтому тут два ответа по сути: Я сильно раньше парилась, когда ещё в ВК постила, но потом забила. Короче я, если честно, вообще редко прям жду реакты и комментарии, и из-за этого каждый раз как в первый ахуеваю радуюсь пищу прыгаю, когда они есть. Но я хз насколько это правильно говорить: я же по сути советую ниче не ждать🤷‍♂️. С другой стороны – перестать париться и пости

🔥32🕊2

8 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

❤️Всем привет это моя анонка Я постараюсь отвечать оперативно, всем заранее спасибо за вопросы 👍

🔥4

8 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC28 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мои твиттерские хроники будут вечером в щитпосте. Через часик открою анонку

🔥3🕊2

8 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я наскриню нам на посмеяться и снесу всё это

💋2🔥1🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 10:50 UTC28 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я нашла 2 своих старых аккаунта в твиттере. Обоже

2🔥1🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC29 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

(Нагло спиздила у Каскад) А потом я предлагаю открыть анонимные вопросы 🫱‍🫲

4🔥2🦄2custom 52426952691616547292custom 53187833592943824992🕊1

8 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC29 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Придурки. Сегодня-завтра артов скорее всего не будет, но могу устроить разговорные интерактивы🥺

custom 531878335929438249932🔥2🕊2

7 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC33 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

А что если... Дней через 5... Ещё слотов на кмм открыть...🥺

🔥5custom 531878335929438249942🕊1custom 52426952691616547291

5 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC35 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

МАРТ VS АВГУСТ 😃 НУ ЕБАТЬ НУ ХАЙП ЖЕ НУ Я ВОТ ТАК ВОТ ПРОСТО🥊🥊🥊 ВЫНЕСЛА ПРОСТО БЭЭМ 🍵 я понимаю что полускеч такой с полноценкой сравнивать некорректно но ГАДДЭМ ВЫ ВИДЕЛИ ЭТОТ ПРОГРЕСС ЙОУ Всем советую прогресс чекать это так самооценку поднимает прям кайфик я собой оч довольна Вот так себя чувствую 🍌

11custom 53187833592943824998🔥6custom 52426952691616547294🕊1🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @chertos626. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Чертос | 626 | камишечки аткрыты” (@chertos626), 112 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chertos626.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.