Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for червя🧼

Channel

червя🧼

@chervyaa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,858subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847524825
TypeChannel
Username@chervyaa
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chervyaa

Growth

6,8436,8656,8548 August 2026 — 6,848 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,848 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,843 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,852 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,857 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,855 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,865 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,864 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,858 subscribers6,8588 August 20261 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 24 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,840–6,868 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 05:566,858-6
29 Aug 2026, 07:196,864-1
25 Aug 2026, 20:346,865+10
22 Aug 2026, 11:476,855-2
19 Aug 2026, 02:126,857+5
15 Aug 2026, 18:476,852+9
8 Aug 2026, 23:346,843-5
8 Aug 2026, 13:456,848no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:326,848first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 21 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.9%
avg views ÷ 6,858 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,690
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held18 (21 September 202519 August 2026)
Views total11,080
Reactions total2,173
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19,143 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53188909181604009008,99347.0%
custom 53234074499342835975,39128.2%
custom 54608282271046837884,75924.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 September 2025 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
267
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 17 we hold a reading for · 76%
Most on one post
104
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chervyaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 September 2025 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC≈2,670 views670 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

пореактите посты сверху братья мои. а еще держите придурков я решила устроить марафон фрик и морда

custom 5323407449934283597670

15 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈3,490 views707 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

лошаде

custom 5323407449934283597707

7 Aug 2026, 14:09 UTC≈4,920 views796 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

реф для моего персонажа и коллаба с сомней 🗯 странное чувство когда выкладываю сюда что-то кроме больших картинок...

custom 5323407449934283597796

13 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC≈10,800 views1,180 reactions51 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

в формате картинки тоже сюда закину. буду рада фидбеку⭐ извините за долгое отсутствие я потихоньку выползаю из норы

custom 53234074499342835971,180

13 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC≈10,200 views928 reactions16 Starsread 20 August 2026
Video

😀😀😀🌟🌟🌟

custom 5323407449934283597928

24 Apr 2026, 10:43 UTC≈22,000 views1,110 reactions12 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

корабликии

custom 53234074499342835971,110

7 Apr 2026, 16:40 UTC≈17,300 views1,030 reactions24 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🤩картиночки мультяшное ⭐ решила постить почаще

custom 54608282271046837881,030

30 Mar 2026, 16:49 UTC≈13,300 views469 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

привет⭐ твитр мои персы рисую в клип студио пеинт комишко/трейды/колаб не беру. пока

custom 5460828227104683788469

15 Feb 2026, 12:04 UTC≈18,200 views1,550 reactions8 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🦠🦠картинка . все вместе дружно представим что она была опубликована вчера !

custom 54608282271046837881,550

23 Jan 2026, 11:39 UTC≈24,400 views1,710 reactions104 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🦠🌟нефига вы активные. ну тогда держите немношка mikrobikov🌟

custom 54608282271046837881,710

7 Jan 2026, 12:53 UTC≈22,900 views1,460 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

пока нечево вам показать.... зато есть деловой бамбук🎋может вы хотите рисунок по каким-нибудь фд/осами напипшите

custom 53188909181604009001,460

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @chervyaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 276,904 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“червя🧼” (@chervyaa), 6,858 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chervyaa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.