Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chess.com - Шахматы

Channel

Chess.com - Шахматы

@chesscom_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,450subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001140769501
TypeChannel
Username@chesscom_ru
Created23 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chesscom_ru

Growth

9,4349,4609,4476 August 2026 — 9,436 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,434 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,446 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,460 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,438 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,447 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,454 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,456 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,454 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,453 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,450 subscribers9,4506 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,430–9,464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 14:409,450-3
1 Sept 2026, 17:249,453-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:059,454-2
26 Aug 2026, 20:049,456+2
23 Aug 2026, 15:459,454+7
19 Aug 2026, 17:379,447+9
16 Aug 2026, 08:279,438-22
12 Aug 2026, 23:499,460+14
9 Aug 2026, 17:229,446+12
7 Aug 2026, 02:589,434-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:179,436first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 9,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,540
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.88%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total21,240
Reactions total399
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,654 reactions across 22 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
88853.7%
😁22013.3%
👍19411.7%
🔥1096.59%
🎉724.35%
321.93%
👏281.69%
🥰211.27%
👎201.21%
🤔181.09%
🤩181.09%
😢171.03%
🍾40.242%
🐳40.242%
🍓30.181%
🫡30.181%
🥱20.121%
😱10.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,654 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC≈1,800 views81 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Белые начинают и ставят мат в один ход 🧩

😁57👍125🔥3🫡3🎉1

18 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC≈3,930 views45 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Ле Туан Минь (он же wonderfultime) — победитель Титульного Вторника! 🏆 🥇 Ле Туан Минь - 9,5 🥈 Пархам Магсудлу - 9,5 🥉 Арджун Эригайси - 9,5 📎 Таблица: https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/titled-tuesday-blitz-august-18-2026-6666505

31🎉6👍5🍾3

16 Aug 2026, 00:22 UTC≈4,240 views120 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Магнус Карлсен — чемпион EWC 2026! Он защитил свой титул 🏆 В финале он победил Дениса Лазавика со счетом 2:0 (3:1, 3:1) 🔥 В матче за третье место Хикару Накамура обыграл Алирезу Фирузджу (4:1) 🥉 Поздравляем всех призеров, особенно Дениса с самым большим успехом в его карьере! 👏

74👍23🔥135👏5

14 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC≈3,690 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Poll

Кто станет чемпионом EWC?

  1. Денис Лазавик28%
  2. Магнус Карлсен76%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26👍8🔥6👏3

14 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC≈3,790 views61 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Денис Лазавик и Магнус Карлсен сыграют в финале EWC 2026 🏆 Отметим, что Денис выбил Нодирбека Абдусатторова и Хикару Накамуру! 👏 Завтра финал 🔥🔥🔥

53👍8

12 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC≈3,790 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Вэй И и Андрей Есипенко пробились в топ 16 Esports World Cup 2026 🏆 Они присоединились к остальным участникам основной сетки! Сегодня Андрею предстоит матч с Магнусом! 🔥 📎 Все пары топ 16: Непомнящий vs Ниманн Лазавик vs Мовахед Накамура vs Сарана Есипенко vs Карлсен Абдусатторов vs Пранеш Дуда vs Бок Эригайси vs Сарин Фирузджа vs Вэй И Сможет ли Магнус защитить свой титул?

32🔥11👍6

9 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC≈3,720 views62 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Пора возродить нашу рубрику «блестящий ход от подписчика» 👀 На f8 у черных стояла ладья 😏 Кидайте в комментарии ваш самый красивый ход за последний месяц 🎉

34👍11👎11😁6

8 Aug 2026, 11:39 UTC≈4,430 views49 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Прагнанандха Рамешбабу уверенно выиграл 2026 Saint Louis Rapid & Blitz 🏆 🥇 Прагнанандха - 23,5 🥈 Жавохир Синдаров - 22 🥉 Уэсли Со - 20,5 Поздравляем индийского гроссмейстера с победой! 🎉

35👍12🍾1👏1

5 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC≈4,400 views43 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Я просто стараюсь не делать глупостей Рамешбабу Прагнанандха лидирует в Saint Louis Rapid and Blitz 2026 перед заключительным кругом блица 🏆 Его преследует Жавохир Синдаров! Сможет ли Прагг удержать первое место? 🔥

29🔥9👍5

4 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈8,630 views99 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Магнус Карлсен выиграл Титульный Вторник впервые с 20 января 2026 года! Поздравляем 👏 🥇 Магнус Карлсен - 9,5 🥈 Арджун Эригайси - 9,5 🥉 Хикару Накамура - 9 📎 Таблица: https://www.chess.com/tournament/live/titled-tuesday-blitz-august-04-2026-6647253

🔥50🎉2010👏6😁6👍5🥱2

2 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈4,800 views79 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Тем временем, 15-летний Ягиз Каан Эрдогмуш становится номером один среди юниоров в мире (2716) 🏆 Он опередил действующего чемпиона мира Гукеша, рейтинг которого сейчас 2703 🥺 Недавно ФИДЕ объявила, что матч на первенство мира пройдет в Женеве (25 ноября - 15 декабря). Какие шансы у Гукеша против Синдарова? 🤔

49😁137👎3👍2🤩2😢2🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈4,120 views55 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

34🤔14😁4👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @chesscom_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@chesscom_ru edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTCAnonymous Poll1,020 voters approx.

Кто станет чемпионом EWC?

  1. Денис Лазавик28%
  2. Магнус Карлсен76%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ChessMaster ♞ Шахматы
@ChessMaestro · 44,198
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 2 September 2026
Шахматы +
@chessgames · 32,814
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 September 2026
EdChess [ENG]
@edchessss · 35,513
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chess.com - Шахматы” (@chesscom_ru), 9,450 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chesscom_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.