Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吃瓜中心

Channel

吃瓜中心

@chigua181

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

857subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001697201545
TypeChannel
Username@chigua181
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chigua181

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8418578498 August 2026 — 852 subscribers8 August 2026 — 852 subscribers31 August 2026 — 842 subscribers10 September 2026 — 841 subscribers18 September 2026 — 857 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 41 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 839–859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 18:16857+16
10 Sept 2026, 10:00841-1
31 Aug 2026, 15:26842-10
8 Aug 2026, 19:00852no change
8 Aug 2026, 18:52852first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 13 December 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 19s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

64 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3046.9%
2640.6%
😱34.69%
🤣23.13%
🥰23.13%
💯11.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2023 to 13 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Dec 2023, 14:09 UTC≈23,200 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://t.me/Dubaijiuwei 这里吃瓜

6👍4

13 Dec 2023, 14:02 UTC≈23,000 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

抓奸 现场,用皮带猛抽

👍104😱3🤣2💯1

13 Dec 2023, 14:00 UTC≈11,800 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

这是北京一外卖小哥夜里睡在高速公路下、外面还下着小雪?男人的生活不易啊? ps:搞个临时帐篷也行啊……

👍42

13 Dec 2023, 14:00 UTC≈12,200 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

北京海淀小学生 ps:有些人出生即是大部分人的终点

2👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @chigua181. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

吃瓜中心🪅龙行知天下🌏
@ZTX95 · 62,253
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 11 here — alongside 10 others — read 18 September 2026
头条新闻💥搞笑视频
@z055q · 55,875
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吃瓜中心” (@chigua181), 857 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chigua181.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.