Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🍉吃瓜-内涵段子-搞笑视频

Channel

🍉吃瓜-内涵段子-搞笑视频

@chigua88666

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,406subscribers

-2,676 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001837384374
TypeChannel
Username@chigua88666
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chigua88666

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,29718,08215,189.511 August 2026 — 18,082 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,990 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,894 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,562 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,389 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,127 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,967 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,633 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,461 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,936 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,826 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,695 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,485 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,196 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,973 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,814 subscribers29 August 2026 — 14,608 subscribers30 August 2026 — 14,209 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,077 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,810 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,619 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,237 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,968 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,297 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,869 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,397 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,131 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,768 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,406 subscribers15,40611 August 202619 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 39 days, net -2,676. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,429–18,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:1615,406-362
16 Sept 2026, 16:5915,768-363
14 Sept 2026, 19:1616,131+2,734
13 Sept 2026, 06:2113,397-472
11 Sept 2026, 07:1913,869+1,572
8 Sept 2026, 12:1812,297-671
5 Sept 2026, 04:0112,968-269
3 Sept 2026, 11:4013,237-382
2 Sept 2026, 04:5713,619-191
1 Sept 2026, 03:0813,810-267
31 Aug 2026, 01:0714,077-132
30 Aug 2026, 01:5914,209-399
29 Aug 2026, 03:2414,608-206
28 Aug 2026, 03:3514,814-159
27 Aug 2026, 04:1814,973-223
26 Aug 2026, 05:5615,196-289
25 Aug 2026, 03:3515,485-210
23 Aug 2026, 21:2715,695-131
22 Aug 2026, 02:0415,826-110
20 Aug 2026, 18:1415,936first reading

Engagement

338 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.297%
avg views ÷ 15,406 subscribers
Avg views / post
45.8
152 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
152
of 338 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held338 (10 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total6,959
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 48m
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 259 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 338 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 338 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC11 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

当 cos 圈来了个国际超模,简直是降维打击

2 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC11 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

2007年,在网吧上网的杨幂,长的是真好看! 最爱的女明星 😤

2 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC10 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

韩红基金会另一救护车供应商实缴资本为零?记者走访公司所在地 近日,北京韩红爱心慈善基金会(简称韩红基金会)救护车采购陷入争议,引发社会关注。 澎湃新闻注意到,除已被立案调查的供应商上海均奕汽车科技有限公司(简称均奕公司),上海逸奕汽车科技有限公司(简称逸奕公司)也曾向基金会供应救护车。该公司注册资本500万元,实缴资本0元,曾与均奕公司共用一处通信地址。 全国慈善信息公开平台“慈善中国”显示,2021年,韩红基金会曾向逸奕公司支付救护车款项341万元。澎湃新闻记者查询工商登记资料获悉,逸奕公司成立于2019年3月,法定代表人钱玮,登记地址为临港新片区环湖西二路888号C楼。企业注册资本最初为1亿元,2025年变更为500万元,均为认缴、无实缴。巧合的是,逸奕公司年报显示,通信地址为静安区洛川中路1158号B1幢211室(也有登记为洛川中路1150号B1幢211室),与均奕公司2020年-2023年年报中的通信地址一致。

2 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC7 viewsread 2 September 2026
Video

真是贱 印度佬来中国都成香饽饽了 #亚洲马桶 #easygirl

Showing the 12 most recent of 338 posts we hold for @chigua88666. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

西港大事件(曝光)
@xigang9918 · 67,385
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
内涵段子🔥搞笑视频
@nh888 · 175,539
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 12 August 2026
内涵段子 🔥搞笑视频 天下
@neihanduanzi1 · 225,435
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 11 August 2026
吃瓜猎奇 幽默视频 搞笑段子
@ay2028 · 79,466
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🍉吃瓜-内涵段子-搞笑视频” (@chigua88666), 15,406 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chigua88666.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.