Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
吃瓜不吐籽🍉
@chiguaa258
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
20,146subscribers
-4,594 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002715997379 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chiguaa258 |
| Description | 瓜不在大,有料就行。 这里是吃瓜不吐籽的你最爱的地方! 每天一个新瓜,围观不迷路,爆料不打烊! 关注我,第一时间围观全网大戏! #吃瓜 #偷拍 #搞笑 #反差 #自拍 #精神小妹 #搞笑 #cos #猎奇 🔍防失联导航: @sabaodh 📩商务: @sabao99 @PO1616 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chiguaa258 |
Topic
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 23:11 | 20,146 | -114 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:41 | 20,260 | -163 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 17:05 | 20,423 | -52 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 14:26 | 20,475 | -14 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:31 | 20,489 | -134 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 15:15 | 20,623 | -176 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:36 | 20,799 | -191 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 17:35 | 20,990 | -117 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:37 | 21,107 | +379 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 20,728 | -105 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:37 | 20,833 | +828 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:01 | 20,005 | -82 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 10:54 | 20,087 | -191 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:07 | 20,278 | -118 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 20,396 | -158 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 05:11 | 20,554 | -124 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 20,678 | -98 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 20,776 | -93 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:14 | 20,869 | -52 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 20,921 | first reading |
Engagement
474 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.47%
- avg views ÷ 20,146 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 900
- 66 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.315%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 67
- of 474 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 66 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 474 (7 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 59,385 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 15:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,600
- Videos
- ≈38,400
- Links
- ≈2,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 4h 35m
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 335 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 14 | 36.8% | |
| ❤ | 7 | 18.4% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 15.8% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 10.5% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 7.89% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.26% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 2.63% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.63% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 474 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 474 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
什么味 ?
太假了 #弹力测试
你老婆 几点回家 #美女 #合集
#秀恩爱 恶心 !举报了 !
Video, posted without a caption
法国一银行遭黑客转走超8亿元 法国一家地区性银行4日说,该行遭到网络攻击,可能有上亿欧元的资金被黑客转走。当前该行已拦截部分被盗资金。 据法新社报道,法国互助信贷阿凯亚银行说,黑客进入该银行自身的账户,向其他银行转账,被盗资金随后经由专门平台兑换成加密货币。不过,银行方面已拦截部分资金,并采取其他措施追回其余资金。银行客户的资金没有遭受损失。 有法国媒体披露,被黑客转走的资金达1.18亿欧元(约合人民币8.8亿元)。银行方面表示:“此次攻击涉及的资金数额仍在评估中,但并未……达到损害集团财务健康和稳健性的程度。” 此外,银行方面已排除转账由人为失误造的可能性,并称“这是一起来自外部的复杂攻击”。该机构未说明网络攻击由谁以及如何实施。 巴黎检察官办公室已对此事展开正式调查,称调查涉及“一个有组织团伙对自动化数据处理系统的攻击”。
缅甸人民国防军(PDF)抵抗力量突袭警察局
拉特尔:一则爆炸事件撼动了拉特尔市。爆炸发生在维拉施拉奥·德什穆克路上,当时一名快递员正在从一辆快递车上卸货。爆炸导致一名快递公司员工严重受伤。监控录像显示,在将箱子从车上卸下时,突然发生了一次巨大的爆炸。该工人伤势严重,已被送往医院,目前情况危急。拉特尔警方、排爆小组和法医团队在事发后不久抵达现场,并展开联合调查,以确定爆炸原因。初步报告显示,爆炸发生在卸货过程中,这表明箱子可能包含爆炸物。#爆炸 @qqmua
#网传 昨天武汉1818报复社会爆炸 一个人点了十个外卖员要帮忙拍安全培训照片,人到了把人都反锁房间里点燃天然气,几个外卖员踹门跑出来了 #报复社会 ? #警方通报
🖕🖕🖕
酒泉步行街一男一女事件 #户外 #激情
Showing the 12 most recent of 474 posts we hold for @chiguaa258. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@chiguaa258 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 5 October 2026 – 5 October 2026 · confirmed gone 27 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“吃瓜不吐籽🍉” (@chiguaa258), 20,146 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chiguaa258.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.