Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇨🇱 Chileaks

Channel

🇨🇱 Chileaks

@chileaks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,181subscribers

+55 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001819656805
TypeChannel
Username@chileaks
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chileaks

Growth

1,1261,1811,153.59 August 2026 — 1,126 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,157 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,158 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,162 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,163 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,170 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,171 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,176 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,181 subscribers9 August 202611 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 33 days, net +55. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,118–1,189 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 11:171,181+5
6 Sept 2026, 08:001,176+5
1 Sept 2026, 14:341,171+1
29 Aug 2026, 05:041,170+3
26 Aug 2026, 12:521,167+4
23 Aug 2026, 19:441,163+1
20 Aug 2026, 06:451,162+4
17 Aug 2026, 15:181,158+1
14 Aug 2026, 00:481,157+17
10 Aug 2026, 15:371,140+14
9 Aug 2026, 16:151,126first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

182 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4122.5%
👀3117.0%
😱3016.5%
😁179.34%
👍147.69%
🗿116.04%
🌚94.95%
👻94.95%
custom 545838562766383470984.40%
🔥52.75%
🐳31.65%
custom 546517880563722693721.10%
😈10.549%
🤔10.549%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 182 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC178 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Actualización: El grupo QILIN finalmente publica la totalidad de la data extraída de los sistemas de ATCOM.

🗿4🌚1

8 Aug 2026, 22:08 UTC225 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 54583856276638347096

8 Aug 2026, 22:05 UTC227 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

La Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago estableció un procedimiento permanente para bloquear sitios de apuestas online no autorizados, adoptando el mecanismo propuesto por Subtel. Se usará DNS para ser específicos y minimizar impactos en servicios legales. Superintendencia de Casinos de Juego validará los dominios, Subtel los comunicará a los proveedores de internet para el bloqueo. Empresas como Claro, Entel y WOM deber

3👍2🌚1

8 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC322 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇱 Se ha detectado una supuesta filtración de datos de Chilenos por parte del grupo "Los Chalacos" . Data no verificada.

🐳3custom 54583856276638347092🗿1😱1

4 Aug 2026, 23:54 UTC613 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Aclaración, al parecer habria sido un falso positivo de Google. https://x.com/chum1ng0/status/2084781673422438644?s=20

👍1

4 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC641 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇱 El blog del investigador de seguridad Chum1ng0, security-chu.com, ha sido eliminado como resultado de una revisión malintencionada solicitada por un tercero.

😱10👀2

3 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTC676 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇱 El grupo MARS (Infrastructure Destruction Squad) asegura haber comprometido infraestructura de la empresa de telecomunicaciones GTD (gtd.cl) . Prometen publicar análisis, acceso y datos.

👀161👻1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 03:23 UTC693 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇨🇱 El usuario cyk (vinculado a SoulHemTeam, ChronusTeam y Sqx) filtró en un foro un archivo de 252 MB. El archivo incluye fotografías y datos personales de estudiantes, presuntamente extraídos del portal de la Escuela de la PDI (portal.escuelapdi.cl).

😱102custom 54651788056372269372🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC629 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Lamento la inactividad. 🇨🇱 Se ha detectado venta de Supuestos Datos Internos de Falabella, aproximadamente 2TB de datos. El red actor ofrece samples para verificación. No confirmado al 100%.

🌚51👍1

30 Jul 2026, 19:37 UTC764 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

El grupo The Gentlemen ha publicado en su blog a Minera Las Cenizas, S.A. , en Chile ( cenizas.cl ), como posible víctima de un ciberataque de ransomware.

3

29 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC746 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Aun hay formas de saltarse el 2FA o interceptarlo, pero lo bueno es que ahora si tenemos una base real de seguridad con la Clave Unica.

7🗿4🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 20:51 UTC816 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Desde esta semana, las personas pueden añadir un Segundo Factor de Autenticación (2FA) a su ClaveÚnica para mayor seguridad en trámites digitales estatales. Esta medida implica validar el inicio de sesión con una app de autenticación, evitando accesos no autorizados. La Secretaría de Gobierno Digital destaca que, aunque se conozca la ClaveÚnica, sin el segundo factor no se podrá ingresar a la cuenta. El proceso es

6👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chileaks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇨🇱 Chileaks” (@chileaks), 1,181 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chileaks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.