Channel
@china_army
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
283subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001750863157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @china_army |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/china_army |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 27 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:09 | 283 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 16:58 | 285 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:39 | 283 | +2 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 09:55 | 281 | -3 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 284 | +4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 280 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 281 | no change |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 281 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 16 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
15 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 46.7% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 26.7% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 6.67% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 11 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇨🇳 The path through mines to the shores of Taiwan Against the backdrop of the PLA's preparations for a possible operation to cross the Taiwan Strait, China continues to expand the family of amphibious combat vehicles based on the Type 05. In the area of the company's enterprise Chongqing Dajiang Industrial Co., Ltd, a engineering version of the platform for landing units has been spotted. The photo shows that the v…
❤1🤯1
🇨🇳 Chinese landing on the Fox 🔻 The Eastern Command of the PLA Ground Forces continues preparing amphibious units for a landing operation in the Taiwan Strait. Recently, another exercise was held at a maritime training ground involving one of the brigades. The main focus was on forming combat formations and maneuvering on the water surface by crews of the ZBD-05 amphibious infantry fighting vehicles and ZLT-05 tank…
🔥4👍1🤔1
🇹🇼 Taichung City turns into an "empty city" At 08:30 Moscow time on July 15, usually busy and bustling Taichung City suddenly looked like a city from a post—apocalyptic movie - no cars, no people. The reason is the large—scale civil defense drill (15-18.07), which take place as part of the Han Guang-41 maneuvers. At the appointed time, air raid sirens sounded in Taichung. The citizens, informed in advance through th…
❤5
🇨🇳🇯🇵Japanese Defense Ministry Report: China is the main strategic threat On July 15, the Japanese Defense Ministry released an annual report known as the White Paper on Defense, in which it officially called China the "greatest strategic challenge" for the country for the first time. The document highlights the aggressive build-up of China's military presence in the Indo-Pacific region and Beijing's increasing mili…
❗❗❗IMPORTANT❗❗❗ Recep Erdogan called the opening of the Zangezur Corridor as a "geostrategic revolution." This project is not just a transport important "artery", but a subtle tool for reshaping the entire region. And the main losers here are Armenia, Russia, and Iran. Armenia: transit country without rights. Baku and Ankara insist on the extraterritorial status of the corridor, which would deprive Yerevan of cont…
😱1
🇹🇼Han Guang-41: tactical medicine at the simulated battlefield On the seventh day of the drill, medics from the 2nd battalion of the 302nd Infantry Brigade in Miaoli County were involved in evacuating conditionally wounded soldiers from the battlefield in ambulances with a capacity of 4 people and providing them with first aid. The medical staff used practices including stopping bleeding, applying bandages to open w…
❤1
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @china_army. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“China army Еnglish” (@china_army), 283 subscribers as measured 29 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/china_army.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.