Channel
@chmo_creator
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002533733143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chmo_creator |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chmo_creator |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 42 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 44 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:31 | 46 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 46 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 9 | 34.6% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 26.9% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 💊 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chmo_creator. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
::Я практически бытовой инвалид, и мне очень стыдно... Я не знаю, перед кем извиняюсь, но простите пожалуйста, что я даже яичницу приготовить не могу... Я реально очень боюсь что-либо начинать делать, если рядом есть тот, кто сделает лучше. Даже если это обычная яичница. Я также очень боюсь помогать в чем-либо, тк боюсь что мне скажут не мешаться под ногами. Причём чаще всего так и говорили, так что мне страшно лезт…
::Мой сына приехал и уебка с собой привёз (значок с Сиэлем)
💘1🙏1
::Мой сына уже ко мне едет, уряяя
💋1
::Дайте мне уже соролов по сиэлоисам, умоляю. Я что угодно сделаю, хоть Сиэля на себя возьму, хоть за вазу на окне ролить буду, мне уже похуй 🙏🙏
::У меня вызывает дикое отвращение то, на что только люди ни готовы ради какой-то картинки в профиле, а именно НФТ. Серьёзно, вы опуститесь до угроз лишь ради какого-то там подарка другого цвета? Зачем так убиваться? Накопите звёзд и купите какого-нибудь мишку - тоже ведь хрень в профиль. Не понимаю причины тряски
::Итак, итоги июля, бябябя =Р 1.ты в отношениях? — нет 2. хочешь отношений? — стыдно признаться, но немного.. 3. тебе нравится кто-то? — да никто 4. нравишься кому-то? — вряд-ли 5. лучшая или худшая версия себя? — определенно лучшая!! 6. счастлива? — 8/10 7. хочешь изменить что-то в себе? — не особо, я и так хороша. 8. пьёшь/куришь? — конечно нет. 9. есть близкие друзья? — естественно 10.внешность? — 9/10 …
::Выложила только в Пинтерест, но хули бы не поделиться ещё и здесь ———————————— ::Абсолютно не нравится анимация глаз, вся кривая, пиздец. Как бы ни старалась - всё равно как лягушка моргает. Всё-таки я разучилась анимировать ———————————— ::Реакции, бистра бля ———————————— Ваша покорная слуга Минори ☕🍃
🍓1💘1🙏1
::Дождевая пикча с Эйфи ———————————— ::Да, давно гачи не было, но у меня появилась мотивация начать все заново. Думаю, что смогу осилить ведение канала ———————————— ::Реакции, бистра ———————————— Ваша покорная слуга Минори ☕🍃
::А кто же это? БЭТМЕЕЕН. ———————————— ::Да, я снова здесь. Я ещё буду выкладывать сюда свою хуйню, да-да. Смотрите на Алоиса ещё года три ———————————— ::Реакции, быстро ———————————— Ваша покорная слуга Минори ☕
Ммм... Попробуем? )
::Бистра там ставим 💘
💘2🍌1
︵︵ 🌟🌟 ☺️ссоциация вашей оски с персонажем !! 👣 𓎟𓎡 ㅤ Вы тупа . . . 🇿🇼🇿🇼🇿🇼Рем 🟤🟤🟤 💘 – это правда , правда тупа я !! 🍓 ( клубничка ) – не слишком похоже 🤩🤩 😻Приз за большее количество реакций – 40 штучек стикеров на заказик !! 🌟🌟 🔤епостики разрешены ! 5️⃣ реакций – продолжение •̀ ᴗ -
💘2🍌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @chmo_creator. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чмо делает контент 🌷🌾” (@chmo_creator), 42 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chmo_creator.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.