Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chronicles Of History

Channel

Chronicles Of History

@chronicles_of_history7

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

579subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002397112581
TypeChannel
Username@chronicles_of_history7
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chronicles_of_history7

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

578595586.57 August 2026 — 595 subscribers8 August 2026 — 595 subscribers25 August 2026 — 587 subscribers31 August 2026 — 585 subscribers9 September 2026 — 578 subscribers17 September 2026 — 579 subscribers5797 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 41 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 575–598 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 23:17579+1
9 Sept 2026, 06:58578-7
31 Aug 2026, 22:05585-2
25 Aug 2026, 00:07587-8
8 Aug 2026, 03:16595no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:40595first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

158 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8453.2%
2616.5%
🔥2314.6%
👍2012.7%
🥰42.53%
🤔10.633%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chronicles_of_history7. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:57 UTC65 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Это T-6 Texan, учебный самолет времен Второй мировой войны, сбрасывает бомбы на позиции противника в густых лесах Гвинеи-Бисау во время Португальской колониальной войны. Из-за международного эмбарго на поставки вооружений Португалия не могла легко закупать современные ударные самолеты, поэтому ВВС были вынуждены приспособить старые учебные T-6 для роли легких бомбардировщиков и самолетов непосредственной авиационной

8🔥3

6 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC109 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Кадры ночного боя во время битвы за Багдад с 3 по 9 апреля 2003 года. Chronicles Of History

7🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC127 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Египетские Т-34-85 во время Войны Судного Дня так же известной как Йом Кипур. 10 октября 1973 года, синайский полуостров. Chronicles Of History

🔥71👍1

5 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC129 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Благодарю за звёзды это показатель что наша работа интересна вам

42

5 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC127 views8 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Еще более серьезной была проблема возможной аварии, мучавшая командование ВВС США. В случае выхода самолета из строя, экипаж должен был направить свой NB-36H в ненаселенную зону. Сама идея ядерной аварии в воздухе над американской территорией была политически взрывоопасной. Атом, допустимый в пустыне Невады, в небе Техаса был категорически неприемлем. В марте 1957 года, после своего последнего полета, NB-36H был тихо

62

5 Aug 2026, 12:29 UTC113 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Схема работы ЯСУ P-1: (1) Воздух проходит через компрессор турбореактивного двигателя обычным способом. (2) Вместо того, чтобы поступать в камеру сгорания, сжатый воздух направляется в заднюю часть реактора. (3) Воздух поступает в активную зону реактора, где он нагревается энергией ядерной реакции. (4) Нагретый воздух перенаправляется в турбореактивный двигатель. (5) Воздух, выходящий из задней части J53, создает тяг

52

5 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC95 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Полет с ядерной силовой установкой: Этап 2, X-6. В соответствии с контрактом ВВС США два бомбардировщика B-36 должны быть переоборудованы в экспериментальные самолеты X-6, каждый из которых должен был быть оснащен ЯСУ P-1, однако программа была закрыта до начала его изготовления. 1) ЯСУ P-1 – см. подробную схему ниже. 2) Обычные поршневые и турбореактивные двигатели. Силовая установка бомбардировщика B-36 была остав

42

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Цифрами показаны: 1) Теплообменник: рассеивал тепло, выделяемое реактором, одновременно охлаждая воду замедлителя и экранирующую жидкость. 2) Реактор. 3) Отсек экипажа – закрытый отсек, экранированный свинцом, который защищал экипаж от воздействия радиации. Авиационный экранированный реактор, литерами показано: A) Входное отверстие замедлителя. B) Циркулирующая вода замедлителя. Она выполняла две функции: 1. поглощен

42

5 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC96 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

полет с ядерной силовой установкой: Этап 1, NB-36H. Экспериментальный самолет Convair NB-36H со стандартной десятимоторной силовой установкой. NB-36H совершил 47 полетов с работающим реактором. Установленный на самолет ядерный реактор использовался не в качестве силовой установкой, а для проверки уровней загрязнения, требований к защите и других практических аспектов, связанных с авиационными ЯСУ. Chronicles Of Hist

62

5 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC102 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Результаты испытаний были одновременно обнадеживающими и тревожными. В ходе испытаний было установлено, что экипаж мог летать, находясь в непосредственной близости от реактора и не повергаясь немедленному воздействию смертельных доз радиации, и что защита кабины экипажа в целом выполняет свою функцию. Одновременно испытания показали более мрачную картину: планер самолета постепенно становится радиоактивным, некоторые

62

5 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC106 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

В период с сентября 1955 по март 1957 года самолет NB-36H совершил 47 полетов с работающим реактором на борту. Каждый полет тщательно планировался, контролировался и сопровождался. На приличном расстоянии от NB-36H летал B-50, в котором находилась группа персонала с оборудованием, измерявшим возможные выбросы от NB-36H. Транспортный самолет C-97 или C-119 перевозил отряд морских пехотинцев, готовых вмешаться в случае

62

3 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC115 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BullpapnikovThunderWTPhoto

🇮🇩Индонезийский БТР-80А в белой окраске миротворческих сил ООН на задании в Ливане. #НаземнаяТехника #Индонезия 💲Админам на пакетики 𝘽𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙥𝙪𝙥𝙣𝙞𝙠𝙤𝙫 𝙏𝙝𝙪𝙣𝙙𝙚𝙧

6🔥21👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chronicles_of_history7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chronicles Of History” (@chronicles_of_history7), 579 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chronicles_of_history7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.