Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 『他』ׅ 𝑪h𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗵 🔒

Channel

『他』ׅ 𝑪h𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗵 🔒

@chrsfld1

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

452subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002738944752
TypeChannel
Usernames@cherishflood1 @chrsfld1
Descriptionּ 꿈속 _ 𑣲⋆ комната 974 ₍ 🛣️ ₎ Oωnᧉr : @RohaGirl Thɑnƙ υ !! @ToHeartU В чистках не участвуем и не проводим!
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held15
On Telegramt.me/chrsfld1

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

452497474.58 August 2026 — 483 subscribers8 August 2026 — 483 subscribers9 August 2026 — 480 subscribers15 August 2026 — 487 subscribers22 August 2026 — 497 subscribers30 August 2026 — 493 subscribers8 September 2026 — 485 subscribers16 September 2026 — 484 subscribers30 September 2026 — 469 subscribers10 October 2026 — 485 subscribers18 October 2026 — 469 subscribers25 October 2026 — 463 subscribers1 November 2026 — 460 subscribers8 November 2026 — 452 subscribers8 November 2026 — 452 subscribers8 August 20268 November 2026
15 measurements spanning 92 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 445–504 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 01:22452no change
8 Nov 2026, 00:47452-8
1 Nov 2026, 00:51460-3
25 Oct 2026, 15:56463-6
18 Oct 2026, 03:18469-16
10 Oct 2026, 20:57485+16
30 Sept 2026, 06:18469-15
16 Sept 2026, 18:58484-1
8 Sept 2026, 19:42485-8
30 Aug 2026, 15:07493-4
22 Aug 2026, 20:23497+10
15 Aug 2026, 19:38487+7
9 Aug 2026, 07:51480-3
8 Aug 2026, 11:50483no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:49483first reading

Engagement

37 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
267.1%
avg views ÷ 452 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,210
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 37 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held37 (3 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total18,112
Reactions total277
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
299
Videos
28
Links
245

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

297 reactions across 9 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54138829417742797455317.8%
custom 54157567844659156385317.8%
custom 54158843063398999154515.2%
custom 54159818450471931074113.8%
custom 54155860595159056903511.8%
custom 54160372458303455593110.4%
custom 5416098968805354644103.37%
custom 531654768278792952772.36%
custom 531702419222955248062.02%
custom 542276779888558795441.35%
custom 531203141730203569831.01%
custom 531233712018927180431.01%
custom 531204251549753268520.673%
custom 534825803621968316620.673%
custom 531227693910751390310.337%
custom 531458009384513181310.337%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 37 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 297 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 37 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 18:06 UTC922 views110 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Красиво вообщето получилось

custom 541598184504719310739custom 541588430633989991524custom 541603724583034555921custom 54138829417742797457custom 54157567844659156387custom 54155860595159056906custom 54160989688053546446

Signed ︎ ︎ ︎

3 Nov 2026, 17:11 UTC≈1,450 views86 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Привет всем снова, я хочу еще раз извиниться за свои действия, больше я ничего сделать не могу. Спасибо всем, кто был с нами. Мы с сонхуном вместе приняли такое решение. Я если честно уже давно склонялась к такому решению. Мы с зумой обе хотим отдохнуть и дать времени личной жизни. Жаль, что на такой ноте я пишу это сообщение, но все же. Пака всем, я буду скучать 🙁🙁 мы сделали все, что в наших силах

custom 541575678446591563834custom 541388294177427974523custom 541558605951590569018custom 541588430633989991511

Signed ︎ ︎ ︎

3 Nov 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,350 views40 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Ребят я понимаю почему такая реакция и все вот это, но мб хватит. Извинения есть, чего вам еще не хватает я честно хз. Ту гифку я скачала из пинта и ее я не замедляла и не смотрела каждую картинку в ней, я уже заменила ее. Окей, извиняюсь за такое, постараюсь больше не допустить таких проебов. Но эту эстетику серьезно не я придумала, в лоре морут правда присутствует романтизация насилия и пдф, но мы и не знали этого …

custom 541388294177427974515custom 541603724583034555910custom 54158843063398999157custom 54155860595159056905custom 54159818450471931072custom 54157567844659156381

Signed Красота Невпопад

3 Nov 2026, 15:28 UTC≈1,440 views32 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Здравствуйте, это пиздец, откуда вы рождаетесь в комментариях Наша эра не связана с «насилием». Возможно, гифка, которую вы видели, показалась странной для такой эры с концептом «Morute». Мы не стремимся к тому, чтобы нормализовать детское насилие. В комментариях к нашему посту начали появляться негативные высказывания. Возможно, в этом виноват владелец флуда. Но мы обязательно решим эту проблему. Я, как совладеле…

custom 541575678446591563811custom 54138829417742797458custom 54155860595159056906custom 54160989688053546444custom 54158843063398999153

Signed ︎ ︎ ︎︎ ︎ ︎ ︎ Блозуми

1 Nov 2026, 16:45 UTC≈1,380 viewsread 8 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Красота Невпопад

30 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,310 viewsread 8 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Ханахаки

30 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 8 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Ханахаки

30 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 8 November 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed Ханахаки

30 Oct 2026, 15:09 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 8 November 2026

Кого нет в папке сз киньте сс на инфо: https://t.me/addlist/SFemM8oVPj9iMDky

Signed Ханахаки

Showing the 12 most recent of 37 posts we hold for @chrsfld1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“『他』ׅ 𝑪h𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗵 🔒” (@chrsfld1), 452 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chrsfld1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.