Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chuvapa_NSFW๐Ÿ”ž

Channel

Chuvapa_NSFW๐Ÿ”ž

@chu_NSFW

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

45subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002718251832
TypeChannel
Username@chu_NSFW
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 21 August 2025 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chu_NSFW

Growth

424543.58 August 2026 โ€” 42 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 42 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 44 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 45 subscribers8 August 202625 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 42โ€“45 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 00:1445+1
17 Aug 2026, 09:3344+2
10 Aug 2026, 17:4642no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:4742first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 August 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ€” we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

225 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6127.1%
๐Ÿฅฐ5825.8%
๐Ÿ”ฅ3113.8%
๐Ÿ“156.67%
๐Ÿฆ„146.22%
๐ŸŒ62.67%
๐Ÿคฏ62.67%
๐Ÿ’‹52.22%
๐Ÿ‘€31.33%
๐Ÿ’˜31.33%
๐Ÿ˜31.33%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ31.33%
๐Ÿคฉ31.33%
๐Ÿ‘20.889%
๐Ÿ‘ป20.889%
๐Ÿ’Š20.889%
๐Ÿ•Š20.889%
๐Ÿ˜20.889%
๐Ÿค”20.889%
๐ŸŒญ10.444%
1 further kind10.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 225 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2025 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for ยท 12%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @chu_NSFW. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 August 2025 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 20:31 UTC428 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

๐ŸฏTry everything (Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh)โ˜˜๏ธ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿฅฐ2๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1

20 Jul 2026, 19:42 UTC123 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

A Spicy version ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ’œโœจ๐Ÿ“—

๐Ÿ”ฅ7๐Ÿฅฐ3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ“1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’‹1

19 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC109 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Quick ๐Ÿ† sketches. References taken from the Internet๐Ÿง

๐Ÿฅฐ10๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐ŸŒ3

9 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC154 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Latex Suit Study ๐Ÿ’œ๐Ÿ–ค Cobrah inspires passionate drawings๐Ÿ‘„

๐Ÿฅฐ5๐Ÿ”ฅ1

9 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC515 views18 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ10๐Ÿฅฐ4๐Ÿ˜ˆ3๐Ÿ”ฅ1

2 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC347 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

A Spicy Commission for๐Ÿฏ @NikoloHard Character: ๐Ÿ’œ Sweet ๐ŸฆŒ Angelfox59

๐Ÿฅฐ17โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿ‘€1๐Ÿ‘1

7 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC189 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @chuvapa_vidraVideo

Video, posted without a caption

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿ“2๐Ÿ˜2๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿฅฐ1

6 Jun 2026, 22:48 UTC249 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

๐ŸฆŠSomewhere in Sherwood Forest ๐ŸŒฒ๐ŸŒณ

๐Ÿ“12โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿฅฐ4๐Ÿคฏ1

24 Apr 2026, 21:04 UTC872 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

-I am a frog! ๐Ÿธ -I see๐Ÿชฐ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ‘€2๐Ÿ•Š2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1

3 Feb 2026, 23:11 UTC988 views25 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿฐ๐Ÿฅ•

๐Ÿฆ„14โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ8๐Ÿฅฐ3

12 Nov 2025, 22:27 UTCโ‰ˆ1,010 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿช™Where did the road to El Dorado lead?

๐Ÿคฉ3๐Ÿฅฐ3โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1

7 Nov 2025, 21:59 UTCโ‰ˆ2,410 views9 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ–คGorgeous Hornyta from hornytallers catacombs

๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿ’‹2๐Ÿฅฐ1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @chu_NSFW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ€” Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œChuvapa_NSFW๐Ÿ”žโ€ (@chu_NSFW), 45 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chu_NSFW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.