Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Chunqiao Publications

Channel

Chunqiao Publications

@chunqiaopub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

488subscribers

+47 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002374735607
TypeChannel
Username@chunqiaopub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chunqiaopub

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

441488464.512 August 2026 — 441 subscribers12 August 2026 — 445 subscribers19 August 2026 — 448 subscribers26 August 2026 — 455 subscribers2 September 2026 — 475 subscribers10 September 2026 — 485 subscribers18 September 2026 — 488 subscribers12 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 434–495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:40488+3
10 Sept 2026, 14:41485+10
2 Sept 2026, 03:48475+20
26 Aug 2026, 00:34455+7
19 Aug 2026, 14:28448+3
12 Aug 2026, 22:07445+4
12 Aug 2026, 04:45441first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 14 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤16073.1%
🔥2310.5%
😢156.85%
🫡146.39%
🎉62.74%
👍10.457%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 04:22 UTC129 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/ChunqiaoPub/status/2084131747575321066?s=20

❤5

3 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC129 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

34 years ago today, Wang Hongwen passed away.

😢15

3 Aug 2026, 04:21 UTC128 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

34年前的今天,王洪文离开了我们。

🫡14

22 Jul 2026, 02:31 UTC282 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026

We will continue to share the latest developments, but our first publications will be coming out soon.

🔥14

22 Jul 2026, 02:30 UTC273 viewsread 12 August 2026

我们将继续提供最新进展,但我们最初的出版物很快就会发布。

8 Jul 2026, 02:16 UTC560 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Poll | 投票

  1. ⭕️ Option 1 | 选项 140%
  2. 🟥 Option 2 | 选项 260%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jul 2026, 02:14 UTC513 viewsread 12 August 2026

Good morning, comrades! We would like to initiate a poll below. ⭕️ Option 1: All publications (including the new publications) are released simultaneously. 🟥 Option 2: First release all of the old editions (but with greatly improved quality), and afterward release the new publications. We have been discussing releasing them in batches to avoid another postponement. Please vote below to choose. Chunqiao Publicat…

8 Jul 2026, 02:13 UTC459 viewsread 12 August 2026

早上好,同志们! 我们想在下面发起一项投票。 ⭕️ 选项一: 所有出版物(包括新的出版物)同时发布。 🟥 选项二: 先发布所有旧版(但质量大幅提升)的出版物,之后再发布新版出版物。 我们一直在讨论分批发布,以避免再次延期。 请在下方投票选择。 春桥出版社

18 Jun 2026, 03:08 UTC518 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Comrades, good morning. A brief update: Our plans to launch new publications this summer remain on schedule. We are gradually transferring all of our older publications to the new publishing house, while refining and improving them. In addition, we still have not received any news from that cowardly old Indian state. Over the coming weeks, we will continue to provide further updates. Once again, thank you all fo…

❤39👍1

18 Jun 2026, 03:07 UTC459 viewsread 12 August 2026

同志们,早上好。 简要更新一下: 我们今年夏季推出新出版物的计划仍在按时推进。我们正在逐步将所有旧出版物转移到新的出版社,并对其进行完善和改进。 此外,我们至今仍未收到那个懦弱的旧印度国家的任何消息。 未来几周内,我们将继续提供更多更新。 再次感谢大家的支持。 春桥出版社

29 May 2026, 02:16 UTC795 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://x.com/ChunqiaoPub/status/2060180172549079064?s=20

🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chunqiaopub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Jul 2026, 02:16 UTCFinal Results70 voters

Poll | 投票

  1. ⭕️ Option 1 | 选项 140%
  2. 🟥 Option 2 | 选项 260%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 March 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Chunqiao Publications” (@chunqiaopub), 488 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chunqiaopub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.