Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CUBUS

Channel

CUBUS

@chyba_buba

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,639subscribers

-484 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001961216042
TypeChannel
Username@chyba_buba
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/chyba_buba

Growth

15,63916,13415,886.57 August 2026 — 16,123 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,123 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,134 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,120 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,085 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,062 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,028 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,025 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,016 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,999 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,977 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,960 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,942 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,929 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,898 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,863 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,850 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,835 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,825 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,807 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,786 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,760 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,728 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,702 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,675 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,639 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,565–16,208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 06:1515,639-36
3 Sept 2026, 10:5715,675-27
2 Sept 2026, 07:4415,702-26
1 Sept 2026, 06:4815,728-32
31 Aug 2026, 05:3715,760-26
30 Aug 2026, 03:2515,786-21
29 Aug 2026, 00:5215,807-18
27 Aug 2026, 22:3215,825-10
27 Aug 2026, 00:1215,835-15
25 Aug 2026, 21:1315,850-13
24 Aug 2026, 20:4415,863-35
23 Aug 2026, 05:4715,898-31
21 Aug 2026, 15:4815,929-13
20 Aug 2026, 16:5715,942-18
19 Aug 2026, 14:1115,960-17
18 Aug 2026, 15:4815,977-22
17 Aug 2026, 19:1415,999-17
16 Aug 2026, 18:0616,016-9
15 Aug 2026, 04:5816,025-3
14 Aug 2026, 00:4416,028first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.2%
avg views ÷ 15,639 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,320
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.69%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held33 (29 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total46,455
Reactions total2,178
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4,144 reactions across 33 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,00548.4%
🔥1,46335.3%
🤡64515.6%
😁310.748%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,144 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 33 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @chyba_buba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 13:38 UTC845 views101 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ой, а кто это у нас тут зажрался, точно это же блиц зажрался🫡 ДНИ ПРЕМА ПОМОЙКА - ❤️

99🔥1😁1

2 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈1,020 views167 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Я не понял, почему в канале про ТАНКИ С ХП побеждает СИМУЛЯТОР ВАНШОТА? Вы типа настолько не любите Tanks Blitz?🫡 ЛЮБЛЮ - ❤️ НЕНАВИЖУ - 🔥

🔥13727😁2🤡1

1 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTC≈1,340 views14 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Что лучше?

  1. Танки с ХП53%
  2. Симулятор ВАНШОТА64%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤡14

30 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,880 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Пока на стримы не заходите всю движуху пропускаете🫡

48🤡8🔥1😁1

28 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC≈2,240 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Запускаю рубрику прокачки аккаунта, надеюсь без доната, подарки не нужны🫡 СМОТРЕТЬ НА ЮТЮБЕ

9🤡8🔥1😁1

18 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,390 views140 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

По блицу пока не будет контента ни на ютюбе, ни в этой телеге🫡 Когда включать одну хуйню, тогда буду по блицу делать ролики, ну а пока не включили, я думаю провалюсь в Мир Танков и займусь параллельными проектами🥹 ТЕЛЕГА ПО МИРУ ТАНКОВ УРЫЫ - ❤️ НЕ УРЫЫ - 🔥

107🔥30🤡3

17 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC≈3,270 views436 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Танкисты, как вам игра под названием Tanks blitz?👇 КЛАССНАЯ - ❤️ ПОЙДЕТ - 🔥 ДЕРМИЩЕ - 🤡

🤡318🔥9127

11 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈4,860 views73 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Пока не включат кое-какую штуку в блице, я хуй буду снимать ролики и стримить🫡 #нетконтрибьютерству

65🤡8

11 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈4,650 views261 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Никакого блица - ДЕНЬ 1🫡 Включайтесь в ЧЕЛЛЕНДЖ👇 ПОДДЕРЖИВАЮ - ❤️ ИГРАЛ СЕГОДНЯ - 🔥

177🔥80🤡4

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @chyba_buba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@chyba_buba edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 12:39 UTCAnonymous Poll482 voters

Что лучше?

  1. Танки с ХП53%
  2. Симулятор ВАНШОТА64%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Blitz Hard
@hardblitz · 35,834
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Mad Maks Blitz
@mad_maks_blitz · 58,743
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Tanks Blitz
@tanks_blitz_official · 480,533
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CUBUS” (@chyba_buba), 15,639 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chyba_buba.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.