Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Иван Успенский

Channel

Иван Успенский

@cinik_mozgoprav

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,433subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002102012966
TypeChannel
Username@cinik_mozgoprav
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cinik_mozgoprav

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,4012,4352,4187 August 2026 — 2,401 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,402 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,404 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,405 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,407 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,409 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,410 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,408 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,412 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,409 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,435 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,431 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,433 subscribers2,4337 August 202614 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,396–2,440 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 06:212,433+2
10 Sept 2026, 14:372,431-4
5 Sept 2026, 15:592,435+26
1 Sept 2026, 23:292,409-3
30 Aug 2026, 02:262,412+4
27 Aug 2026, 05:342,408-2
24 Aug 2026, 05:452,410+1
20 Aug 2026, 19:422,409+2
18 Aug 2026, 02:032,407+2
14 Aug 2026, 16:252,405+1
10 Aug 2026, 20:412,404+2
8 Aug 2026, 05:072,402+1
7 Aug 2026, 13:482,401first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 40s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

912 reactions across 17 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣29131.9%
💯13614.9%
🤮727.89%
🔥677.35%
👍535.81%
🤬434.71%
👏414.50%
😱363.95%
😁323.51%
🙏222.41%
202.19%
🏆192.08%
😡141.54%
😨141.54%
🍾80.877%
🤯70.768%
🫡70.768%
👎60.658%
😢60.658%
🤝50.548%
8 further kinds131.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 912 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC550 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ужас-то какой... Разве так можно? Нам нужно активнее бороться с сексизмом! Иван Успенский (с)

🤣40🔥94😍1

4 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC604 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Вы только посмотрите на всех этих мизогинных сексисток-женоненавистниц! Они считают, что быть женщиной - зашквар! #НетСексизму! Иван Успенский (с)

🔥33🤣22💯6👏41💩1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC670 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Мужчину зверски избили дубинкой и пырнули ножом за защиту бабы в Новосибирской области Двое отморозков набросились на прохожего, когда тот вступился за незнакомку. Его били руками, ногами и палкой, после чего вонзили в тело клинок. Куда делась бабень - не уточняется... Иван Успенский (с)

😱26😨14🤣9🍾4😁4💯3🏆1🥰1

3 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC626 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Пишут, что Ростове-на-Дону таксист вырубил боевого аленя Пьяная пара долго ругалась на улице, пока шофёр ждал в автомобиле. После просьбы ехать мужчина начал хамить и предложил разобраться "раз на раз". Поведение охуевшей от безнаказанности бабы - вообще класега жанра... Сообщают, что водила в итоге всё-таки уехал. Иван Успенский (с)

👍28😡14🔥2🤣2😱2🍾1🤔1

2 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC678 views63 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Да неужели? Иван Успенский (с)

💯41🤣12😱5😁3🌚2

1 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC678 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Придумайте название к новости... Иван Успенский (с)

🤬43👎6😁3🤣1

1 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC706 views69 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Да не бомбит у неё. Это же очевидно? И с ней не поспоришь. Мы трепещем перед такими "сильными" женщинами. В ужасе просто... И она прямо в точку зарядила про нашу слабость. А когда рандомная баба тебя слабаком считает, то самооценка в моменте вааще в ноль уходит... Пойду, приму триста капель эфирной валерьянки, лягу в постель, забудусь сном... Иван Успенский (с)

🤣49🤮13🎉21💩1🔥1😁1😭1

1 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC682 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Придумайте название к новости... Иван Успенский (с)

🤣29🤯7🏆5😁41💯1

1 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC718 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

"Хау мач?" На Кипре россиянка возмутилась поведению хорватских туристов, которые приняли ее за проститутку и интересовались ценой. Бабень попыталась объяснить им про жару в городе, но это было бесполезно. Неужели она похожа на шлюху? Глупость какая... Придурки! Максимум - на шлюху на пенсии. Иван Успенский (с)

🤣59💯6🔥1😱1

1 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC633 views72 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Просто посмотрите на всех этих баб - сколько же бриллиантов, да?😍😍😍 UPD Почему всякие порицаемые и запрещенные западные драг квины и тайские трансы больше похожи на баб, чем наши бабы? Иван Успенский (с)

🤮46🤣19💯4🍾3

1 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC617 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обстановка в конфе админов Альфы. Иван Успенский (с)

👍9😎1

31 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC742 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, не забывайте про наш легендарный паблик в ВК. https://vk.com/alfa_vkofficial Иван Успенский (с)

6🔥3👍1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @cinik_mozgoprav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Репка Лихие 90-е
@repkalihie90e · 21,535
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Иван Успенский” (@cinik_mozgoprav), 2,433 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cinik_mozgoprav.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.