Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бэкап дополнительных материалов к сводкам CIT

Channel

Бэкап дополнительных материалов к сводкам CIT

@cit_backup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,061subscribers

-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001602396940
TypeChannel
Username@cit_backup
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cit_backup

Growth

3,0603,0813,070.57 August 2026 — 3,081 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,080 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,075 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,073 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,071 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,070 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,069 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,067 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,064 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,060 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,061 subscribers3,0617 August 20267 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 31 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,057–3,084 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 11:553,061+1
2 Sept 2026, 20:583,060-4
31 Aug 2026, 00:363,064-3
27 Aug 2026, 17:053,067-2
24 Aug 2026, 07:153,069-1
21 Aug 2026, 01:253,070-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:373,071-2
14 Aug 2026, 21:573,073-2
11 Aug 2026, 06:243,075-5
7 Aug 2026, 20:003,080-1
7 Aug 2026, 08:153,081first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 22 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 10s
Average length
2m 05s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

263 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5621.3%
👍5019.0%
🤬3613.7%
😢3412.9%
🤔2911.0%
😨217.98%
83.04%
😱51.90%
🤷‍♂51.90%
🤯41.52%
👀31.14%
👏31.14%
💩20.76%
😡20.76%
🤣20.76%
😁10.38%
🤨10.38%
🥰10.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2025 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 11:36 UTC863 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Спутниковый снимок (Sentinel 2) быстроходного парома в Керченском проливе 21 июля

🤷‍♂5💩2🤔2😁1

25 May 2026, 09:58 UTC≈2,000 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Карта так называемых «дронопортов» — российских аэродромов, используемых для запусков «шахедов» по Украине

🔥5🤬3🤔21

24 Jan 2026, 13:33 UTC≈3,010 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Геолокация примерного района пуска зенитной ракеты, влетевшей в жилой дом под Краснодаром в ночь на 21 января

👍10🔥3

14 Nov 2025, 15:20 UTC≈3,670 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Изменения линии фронта на гуляйпольском и александровском направлениях за месяц с 14 октября

😨15😢11👍6🤔3🤬3🔥1

7 Nov 2025, 14:57 UTC≈3,480 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Спутниковый снимок северных пригородов Покровска с отметками авиаударов за 19–29 октября (жёлтым) и 29 октября — 3 ноября (красным)

🤔41

3 Nov 2025, 14:35 UTC≈3,370 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Возможные районы пуска ракеты по Лапаевке Львовской обл. 5 октября при дальности 500 км (красная окружность) и 1200 км (синяя)

🤔9😱4🔥1🤨1

6 Aug 2025, 11:24 UTC≈4,750 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Жертвы среди мирного населения, статистика

🤬23😢9🔥1🤯1😱1

28 Jul 2025, 11:56 UTC≈4,240 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @zaliznakaraVideo

наступальні дії противника при підтримці 6-ти танків, 3-х БТР, 6-ти МТЛБ, БРЕМ, 12-ти ЛАТ, 2-х багі, 41 мотоциклу (54 омбр, 81 оаембр)

👍9🔥3

23 Jun 2025, 13:18 UTC≈4,920 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пожар в районе НПЗ в Кременчуге Полтавской обл. 21 июня, по данным NASA FIRMS

😢14🤬4😡2👍1

17 May 2025, 14:16 UTC≈5,370 views50 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wargonzoVideo

⚡️Эксклюзив 18+⚡️Видео удара по мосту авиабомбой от первого лица⚡️ ВСУ продолжают бить по территории России авиабомбами иностранного производства. С мест сообщают о прилетах двух вражеских Himars в районе Тёткино, постоянных обстрелах артиллерией и сбросах с fpv. На кадрах – российские бойцы на мосту в Курской области несколько дней назад. @wargonzo

🔥35👍63👀2🤣2🤬1🥰1

2 May 2025, 11:52 UTC≈2,860 viewsread 7 August 2026

Сентябрьский пост ныне удалённого ТГ-канала «ВЧК-ОГПУ» о китайском происхождении комплекса РЭБ «Выжигатель»

2 May 2025, 11:52 UTC≈3,880 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как стало известно ВЧК-ОГПУ, так называемый комплекс обнаружения и подавления БПЛА «Выжигатель», широко разрекламированный пресс-службой Росгвардии в связи с его применением «в регионе проведения специальной военной операции», оказался произведен в Китае, а его поставка в войска обернулась возбуждением уголовного дела о контрабанде. 231 «Выжигатель» по госконтракту, заключенному 8 ноября 2023 года, Росгвардии в конце

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cit_backup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Conflict Intelligence Team
@CITeam · 88,140
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бэкап дополнительных материалов к сводкам CIT” (@cit_backup), 3,061 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cit_backup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.