Channel
@citatspercem
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,451subscribers
-87 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002226695496 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @citatspercem |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/citatspercem |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:57 | 3,451 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 3,456 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 19:41 | 3,458 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:14 | 3,470 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:16 | 3,475 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 3,478 | -14 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 15:08 | 3,492 | -6 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 01:01 | 3,498 | -10 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:58 | 3,508 | -12 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 3,520 | -14 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:57 | 3,534 | -3 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 3,537 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:22 | 3,538 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
133 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 89 | 66.9% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 10.5% | |
| 🔥 | 12 | 9.02% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 7.52% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 4.51% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.50% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Самые сладкие вещи становятся горькими из-за своих поступков. Уильям Шекспир, "Сонет 94" Когда прекрасный человек совершает низкий поступок, он становится гораздо хуже и отвратительнее изначально дурного человека.
Легче сопротивляться в начале, чем в конце. Леонардо да Винчи, "Философские максимы" Автор имел в виду, что любое пагубное влияние, привычку, соблазн или проблему гораздо проще остановить в самом зародыше.
👍1
Люди измеряют нас собственным мерилом и не хотят позволить нам быть выше себя. Артур Шопенгауэр, «Парерга и Паралипомена» О человеческой зависти и о том, как трудно людям признавать чужой успех.
👍7
Человек часто считает злым в других то, что сам не способен в себе признать. Артур Шопенгауэр, "О человеческой природе"
💯5
От большинства людей нас отделяют не границы, а только другой способ видеть. Герман Гессе Настоящие барьеры между людьми создаются не географией или языком, а разницей в мышлении и восприятии.
💯6
Есть люди, которые никогда не ошибаются, потому что никогда не берутся ни за что стоящее. Иоганн Вольфганг Гёте Гёте говорит о том, что настоящий жизненный опыт и успех возможны только через риск и преодоление трудностей.
👍6
Желание казаться умным часто мешает нам стать умнее. Франсуа де Ларошфуко, «Максимы»
👍4
Самый большой обман человек терпит от собственных убеждений. Леонардо да Винчи, «Записные книжки» Своя правда порой мешает увидеть то, что происходит на самом деле.
👍5
Мы легко забываем свои ошибки, когда о них знаем только мы сами. Франсуа де Ларошфуко, «Максимы» Мы охотнее прощаем себе то, за что другим давно вынесли бы приговор.
👍6
Жизнь показывает человеку, чего он хочет, и кем он является. Артур Шопенгауэр, «О человеческой природе» Окружающий мир и наши поступки в нем служат честным отражением нашего внутреннего "я".
👍5
Когда наши пороки оставляют нас, мы льстим себе мыслью, что это мы оставили их. Франсуа де Ларошфуко, «Максимы» Люди склонны переоценивать свою силу воли и приписывать себе победу над собственными слабостями )
👍4🤔2
Мы признаём свои недостатки, чтобы своей искренностью исправить то, как они выглядят в глазах других. Франсуа де Ларошфуко, «Максимы» Люди охотнее прощают тех, кто не врет и не прячется, а открыто признает свои промахи.
👍8🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @citatspercem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Цитаты с Перцем” (@citatspercem), 3,451 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/citatspercem.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.