Channel
@citronus_cex
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,964subscribers
-145 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002249785262 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @citronus_cex |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 18 October 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/citronus_cex |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 3,964 | -18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 3,982 | -31 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 4,013 | -24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 4,037 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:06 | 4,048 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 4,059 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 4,067 | -8 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 4,075 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 4,081 | -11 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 4,092 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:13 | 4,107 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 4,109 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 18 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
562 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 319 | 56.8% | |
| 🔥 | 130 | 23.1% | |
| ❤ | 113 | 20.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 18 October 2024 to 28 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hey everyone! We’ve just rolled out a big update — fixed lots of small bugs and made things a bit more convenient. From now on, we’ll be keeping a changelog, which you can find here: Release notes: https://docs.citronus.com/release-notes/release-notes/release-notes-27.03.2025 We’ll use it to share all major updates, and occasionally give you a sneak peek at upcoming features. In the meantime, we’re working hard …
👍9❤7
0% commission on all trading pairs! Yes, you can now buy and sell any assets on our platform with absolutely no commissions. Any amount, any number of trades, all pairs — 0% commission! Maybe now is the best time to buy or sell? Time will tell. We have also reduced deposit and withdrawal fees for many pairs, so there couldn’t be a better moment! 📱 Twitter | 💎 Tokenomics | 🌐 Blockchain | 💬 Chat
👍11❤1
Hello everyone! A major update was released yesterday, bringing a lot of new features! 🔥 In addition to bug fixes and improvements, we’ve introduced some important changes to the platform. Let’s go through them: 💱 CITRO Deposits and Withdrawals (ETH, CITRO) - CITRO deposits are now available on the ETH network - CITRO withdrawals are now supported on CITRO and ETH networks - Deposits added for TRUMP, LINK, and SOL…
👍12🔥2❤1
Great news — we now have official verification on X/Twitter! ✔️ We submitted the documents, verified the company, showcased our platform — and it’s all set! Thank you for staying with us. We're moving forward! 💙 We've also applied for verification on other platforms: CoinMarketCap, Telegram, CoinGecko — now waiting for confirmation! 🔗 Follow us: https://x.com/Citro_Official Thank you for being with us! More excit…
👍16🔥8❤3
Plans for the First Half of 2025! Part 2 of 5 — Services In this part, we’ll talk about the services launching in the first half of the year and those planned for the rest of 2025 - Exchange ✔️ - Services ✔️ - Blockchain - Community - Token What’s coming in the first half of 2025 🖥 Blogs & Personal Channels Follow popular and successful traders, share your own successes and failures, and monetize your blog. Ever…
🔥10👍5
📊 January in Numbers – Wrapping Up the Month! Hey everyone! This is the second part of our January recap, where we'll dive deeper into the key platform metrics. You can read the first part, focused on development, here (). 🤌 25,000 users successfully passed KYC – and that’s just in the first month without active marketing! Everyone who joins us within the first three months after launch will receive a bonus as ear…
🔥9👍2❤1
Plans for the First Half of 2025! Part 1 of 5 — Exchange. Today, we're sharing our development plans for the exchange. This is the first part of our yearly roadmap. In total, there will be five parts released in February, with each one published on Wednesdays. We just couldn't fit everything into one post! - Exchange - Services (Live Streams, Videos, P2P, Education, Blogs) - Blockchain - Community - Token ▶️ Join …
👍12❤8🔥2
Plans for January! The New Year holidays are over — during this time, the entire team managed to rest, recharge, and gather ideas for the upcoming year. Together with you, we will grow exponentially this year! 🔼 The token is performing well in a falling market, with strong support and large buys from users. We are glad that you believe in us! 💵 $0.14 - current price, growth since the start of trading ±50% Now, le…
👍17🔥6❤5
The Citronus exchange is now open for registrations! 🚀 Exchange link: https://citronus.com/ Technical support: @citronus_help Join us and become part of our community! 💼
❤24👍12🔥10
Hello everyone! News before the launch ▶️ This evening, we’re launching the platform and opening registration. Trading will start tomorrow. We’ve prepared a detailed guide on registration, depositing coins, and the process of buying and selling. 😏 Registration will be open from 20:00 to 22:00 (GMT+3). The link will first be shared in specific chats: for testers, top holders, and active participants, and then publis…
🔥22👍10❤6
Hello! 5 key advantages of our platform. In order to grow, we need to compete, but how exactly will we do it? How do we differ from others and what steps are we taking for development? We will cover all of this in this post. Here, we won’t talk about the specific features of the platform but will share the 5 key principles that form the foundation of the growth of our exchange and ecosystem as a whole. 🥇 Simple in…
👍69❤35🔥6
Stage 2 Completed 🔥 This stage turned out to be massive and sold out completely in just 4 days — much faster than we expected. It’s amazing to see such strong support! 🥇 Victor firmly took first place in the individual ranking, maintaining a wide lead over other participants. Throughout both stages, no one came close to his results. 🥇 Team Legion became the largest and most active team in the project, leaving all …
👍34❤15🔥12
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @citronus_cex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@citronus_cex named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Citro News (ex Limecoin)” (@citronus_cex), 3,964 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/citronus_cex.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.