Questi sono i dati di Camera e Senato in merito le Midterm Elections 2026. Il Presidente Trump ha perso malamente, questo purtroppo è un dato. È il peggio dato della storia americana? Ovviamente no, visto Obama nelle Midterm del 2010 perse ben 63 seggi alla Camera e 6 al Senato. Ma il problema è un altro. Su cosa deve far riflettere tutto ciò? Che la politica, così come le sue interpretazioni, cambia velocemente. I…

Channel
Claudio Lauretti
@clauretti90
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
13,060subscribers
-460 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001731864539 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @clauretti90 |
| Description | 🇮🇹 Italiano, classe ‘90. 💻 Eth1cal Hack3r 💼 Imprenditore, Manager 📍 Roma, Italia |
| Created | 23 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/clauretti90 |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:18 | 13,060 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 17:06 | 13,064 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:55 | 13,074 | -6 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:15 | 13,080 | -3 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 13,083 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 13:50 | 13,086 | -10 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:57 | 13,096 | -7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 13:49 | 13,103 | -4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 13,107 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:14 | 13,112 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:41 | 13,115 | -5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 13,120 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 13,123 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 13,133 | -5 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:36 | 13,138 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 13,144 | -13 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:27 | 13,157 | -8 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:30 | 13,165 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 13,169 | -9 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 13,178 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 22 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.27%
- avg views ÷ 13,060 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,080
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.36%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (22 January 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,681 |
| Reactions total | 273 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 18:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 145
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 131
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 09s
- Average length
- 18s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
516 reactions across 34 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 214 | 41.5% | |
| 👍 | 94 | 18.2% | |
| 🤮 | 73 | 14.1% | |
| 👏 | 56 | 10.9% | |
| 💩 | 22 | 4.26% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 4.26% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 3.68% | |
| 👎 | 12 | 2.33% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.388% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.388% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 516 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (28.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
PREGHIAMO PER NIGERIA 🙏🏻✝️ Ennesimo fine settimana di massacro ai danni delle comunità cristiane. Per chi non lo sapesse, in Nigeria vengono eliminati in media un cristiano ogni 17 minuti. Dobbiamo essere vicini a questi nostri fratelli lontani. Facciamo girare questo eccidio perpetrato solamente per odio religioso. 🔵 Unisciti al mio canale Telegram: https://t.me/clauretti90
❤22
Dobbiamo essere vicini al Reverendo Dachomo, persona dalla bontà e dalla Fede indescrivibile. Ciò che sta subendo è un orrore senza fine. In Nigeria viene giustiziato in media un cristiano ogni 17 minuti. Bisogna parlarne. Bisogna condividere. 🔵 Seguimi su Telegram: https://t.me/clauretti90
❤17
🚨 LA SALIS NON RIESCE A DARE LA SOLIDARIETÀ ALLE FORZE DELL’ORDINE AGGREDITE. La legalità, per loro, è un optional. Credete facciano gli interessi della gente perbene? Assolutamente no. Quante prove ancora vi servono per capirlo? Facciamo girare questa vergogna. 🔵 Seguimi su Telegram: https://t.me/clauretti90
🤮11💩6❤1
🚨 AGGIORNAMENTO DA PARTE DELLA NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY: “Con effetto immediato, tutte le organizzazioni che utilizzano PHP nei propri sistemi sono invitate a prepararsi all'installazione di un aggiornamento che corregge due vulnerabilità critiche. PHP è molto diffuso nello sviluppo di applicazioni web. Queste vulnerabilità possono spesso consentire l'accesso diretto al file system o al database del server. Se non …
🕵🏻♂️🔎 PHISHING IN ARRIVO: LO STUDIO LEGALE ROMANO CHE DI ROMANO NON HA NULLA Poco fa mi è arrivata una #mail firmata da un presunto studio legale di Roma. Dietro, però, c'era ben altro: qualche pseudo-hacker o #bot dall'Asia ha pensato di fregarmi con una minaccia di azioni legali. La mail mi invitava a cliccare su un #link per mettermi in contatto con l'avvocato, altrimenti sarebbero partite le conseguenze legali.…
❤1
La faccia di chi ha compreso che sostenere l’immigrazione clandestina e incontrollata non è stata una grande idea. La ragazza, attivista di sinistra, gli hanno distrutto il negozio a #Parigi. Ah, ndr: Nel video era munita anche di mascherina #Covid19 FFP2. 🔵 Seguimi su Telegram: https://t.me/clauretti90
👍7❤6🤮2
Questi sono i fantomatici “pacifici studenti” che hanno manifestato a Milano. A voi le considerazioni. 🔵 Seguimi su Telegram: https://t.me/clauretti90
🤮3❤1💩1
Quando dici la verità ad un comunista, lui prima di insulta, poi ti blocca. Questo è uno dei tanti messaggi che ho ricevuto per aver preso posizione contro le #manifestazioni. In foto vedere un magnifico esemplare di pseudo-regista. Ecco la pseudo-#cultura infatti in mano a chi sta. Quelli di sinistra sono orrendi. Se prima avevamo qualche dubbio ormai ora non ne abbiamo più.
❤11👏6
Se prendi a mattonate la vetrina di un negozio di un tizio che si alza la mattina alle 5 per pagare il mutuo di casa e sfamare i propri figli non sei un rivoluzionario, sei un pezzo di 💩 Dopo quello che abbiamo visto, sarebbe opportuno fermare tutte le manifestazioni e arrestare fino all’ultimo eversivo. 🔵 Seguimi su Telegram: https://t.me/clauretti90
👏19❤1
“Un uomo senza #Dio ricrea l’inferno in terra”. Card. Sarah Adesso più che mai bisogna unirsi nella preghiera e unire le forze non solo per riaffermare #Jesus come nostro salvatore, ma per difendere i nostri fratelli e sorelle dalla violenza dei demoni che vogliono sterminarci.
👍17👏1
Prosegue il massacro dei cristiani in #Nigeria, massacro di cui non ne parla nessuno. Il Rev. Dachomo ha seppellito altre 7 persone della sua comunità, oggi. In Nigeria muore in media un cristiano ogni 16 minuti. Un dramma che si sta consumando senza una data di fine. 🙏🏻✝️ Preghiamo per i nostri fratelli e sorelle nigeriani/e.
❤10🤬2😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @clauretti90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@andreacolombini · 82,697
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
@gianluigi_paragone · 45,262
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
@Diegodibonito · 35,441
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Claudio Lauretti” (@clauretti90), 13,060 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clauretti90.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.