Channel
@cld_wnd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
96subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001898178704 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cld_wnd |
| Created | Between 1 November 2022 and 31 August 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cld_wnd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:58 | 96 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 06:56 | 95 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 92 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 92 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
202 reactions across 11 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 86 | 42.6% | |
| custom 6046363987606506933 | 36 | 17.8% | |
| 😭 | 30 | 14.9% | |
| 💅 | 25 | 12.4% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 2.97% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 2.48% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.98% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.49% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.99% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.495% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.495% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
недружеское напоминание. взрослые люди не должны вступать в романтические и сексуальные отношения с подростками младше 16 лет ни при каких обстоятельствах, и из этого нет и не может быть никаких исключений. если вы считаете иначе, изолируйтесь пожалуйста от общества.
🤝4😭1🙏1
вам больше нравится...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
мыслевое. мне абсолютно непонятно полное отсутствие стремления к независимости/самостоятельности у некоторых людей. и это не про "все обязательно должны работать во время учёбы и обеспечивать себя с трёх лет", а про абсолютно взрослых людей, у которых нет абсолютно никаких препятствий к тому, чтобы что-то делать, но которые всё равно выбирают жить в симбиозе с кем-то другими без подушки безопасности и прочего. помнит…
❤14🤔3🌭2custom 60463639876065069332💅1💯1
котята плакали кололись и продолжали жрать кактус (у меня по 5-6 занятий в день, многие были неоплачиваемые, каждый вечер начинается с чудесной истерики от усталости над практикой)
😭14💅3🫡2
год обещает быть... интересным. жду ответа про ассистентство и морально готовлюсь пересмотреть своё отношение к выходным
custom 604636398760650693318💅2
на самом деле слегка грустно, что после курса линды от одного слова елан хочется плеваться очень далеко и долго... я люблю свою практику, у меня, кажется, что-то получается, а с еланом-то всё нормально концептуально оказывается
💅6
внимание мысли: - я люблю свою семью, если мы живём отдельно. находиться в одном доме НЕВОЗМОЖНО я всех начинаю ненавидеть - новый пирсинг может дать немного прикола - я предала себя из конца первого семестра и работаю в елане. получая от этого удовольствие. - я не пью психические таблетки уже месяц впервые с 16. последствия интересные, продолжаем наблюдение - хочется даже не получать больше денег, а иметь более проп…
❤21💅2💋1
где-то в процессе добавьте пункт с работой в общепите с ощущением, что это на самом деле ваш максимум
❤17💅1
очень нишевый план: - найдите хорошую высокооплачиваемую работу по абсолютной случайности - по ещё большей случайности добейтесь того, чтобы вас приняли - работайте и подстраивайте жизнь под хороший уровень - после окончания рабочего сезона крупно проебитесь - gaslight yourself into thinking что вас уволят - загоняйтесь по этому поводу два месяца - узнайте, что вас не уволят
❤21💅3
вайбы такие
❤13💅3
- для генеративной теории мы как для партнёра по очереди применяем правила: определённый гендер, возраст, место жительства, статус, так применяем правила пока не останется один кандидат. а теория оптимальности... не воняет...
custom 604636398760650693316💅2
хз. это не должно характеризовать меня, но если честно эта 6 очень сильно наталкивает на мысль, что мне вообще не стоит ни наукой заниматься, ни жить в целом
😭15💔6💊5💅2
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @cld_wnd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
вам больше нравится...
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“дальше только хуже” (@cld_wnd), 96 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cld_wnd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.