Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for clean calls by crash

Channel

clean calls by crash

@cleancallsbycrash

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,468subscribers

-15,070 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002476082944
TypeChannel
Username@cleancallsbycrash
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cleancallsbycrash

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,46825,53818,0037 August 2026 — 25,538 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,519 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,442 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,400 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,374 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,100 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,781 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,094 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,060 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,958 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,885 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,766 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,729 subscribers21 August 2026 — 14,707 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,678 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,654 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,635 subscribers26 August 2026 — 14,596 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,690 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,236 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,181 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,141 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,105 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,065 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,000 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,973 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,911 subscribers9 September 2026 — 10,839 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,774 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,659 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,596 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,532 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,468 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -15,070. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,208–27,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 04:1910,468-64
16 Sept 2026, 21:1910,532-64
15 Sept 2026, 03:1710,596-63
13 Sept 2026, 11:5610,659-115
11 Sept 2026, 14:0110,774-65
9 Sept 2026, 01:5810,839-72
5 Sept 2026, 15:5910,911-62
3 Sept 2026, 17:0110,973-27
2 Sept 2026, 10:4311,000-65
1 Sept 2026, 08:5411,065-40
31 Aug 2026, 07:2311,105-36
30 Aug 2026, 10:1911,141-40
29 Aug 2026, 09:1211,181-55
28 Aug 2026, 08:4311,236-454
27 Aug 2026, 10:0211,690-2,906
26 Aug 2026, 07:5814,596-39
25 Aug 2026, 06:0314,635-19
24 Aug 2026, 03:2514,654-24
22 Aug 2026, 09:4614,678-29
21 Aug 2026, 01:2314,707first reading

Engagement

47 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 10,468 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,780
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 47 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held47 (29 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total25,030
Reactions total2,546
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

16,286 reactions across 41 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,72816.8%
🎉2,59315.9%
🔥2,52815.5%
👍2,48715.3%
👏1,1477.04%
🥰8795.40%
💯8575.26%
🤩8555.25%
❤‍🔥8435.18%
😍7894.84%
😁4422.71%
🐳550.338%
🤝200.123%
🏆140.086%
120.074%
🆒120.074%
🫡80.049%
🌭30.018%
👀30.018%
🗿20.012%
7 further kinds90.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 41 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cleancallsbycrash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 20:33 UTC≈2,500 views307 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Something I've found that helps Is to never allow yourself to do 2 negatives in a row For example Have 1 single croissant But never a second one Have 1 cookie but not a second Have 1 dessert but not a second Oh wait these are all food examples Ok you can get away with skipping the gym 1 day when you're supposed to go BUT NEVER miss 2 DAYS in a row 2 In a row of most "vices" or "pleasures" is the beginning o

❤‍🔥41🔥39🥰39🎉36💯3534👍30😍28

1 Sept 2026, 17:45 UTC≈3,480 views303 reactionsread 3 September 2026

In memes If you’ve done your job an actually positioned well The next job or duty you have is to simply not fuck up the positions you got Most people can’t even get into good positions But then the people who CAN get into good positions, most are messing their future up by fucking those good positions up and not having other things to work towards in the meantime Which makes them “work on their portfolio” or tak

81👍66👏61🔥49🎉46

1 Sept 2026, 17:35 UTC≈3,480 views306 reactionsread 3 September 2026

After some intense thought staring at the wall today I’ve come to the conclusion that the BEST decision I can make today is to simply go for a walk and eat pizza for the first time in a long time Sept 1, 2026 Happy new month fam!

🎉6967👏63🔥54👍53

1 Sept 2026, 02:16 UTCviews —

clean calls by crash pinned «🔥 944.3x $RAM 💰 $6.6K ➜ $6.2M MC 🦜 PIRBView (Pro) 🎯 Maestro · Maestro Pro 🔕 /alerts — pause milestone alerts»

1 Sept 2026, 02:16 UTC≈2,540 views202 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

🔥 944.3x $RAM 💰 $6.6K ➜ $6.2M MC 🦜 PIRBView (Pro) 🎯 Maestro · Maestro Pro 🔕 /alerts — pause milestone alerts

👍46👏4539🔥36🎉35🫡1

31 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈2,540 views297 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

$DENAR touched 1.6m, almost sitting at ath rn, sometimes you just gotta follow your gut I digged up, this is literally the future of finance, I’ll try to give TLDR based on my understanding There are millions of dollars in tokenized stocks sitting on Robinhood Chain doing absolutely nothing. Denar fixes the obvious part: deposit your stock tokens, borrow USDG against them, keep the position, no missed upside. Ima

👏67🎉63🔥6358👍46

31 Aug 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,530 views302 reactionsread 3 September 2026

THE MARKET IS NOT DONE YET. Yesterday was straight insanity. 898X IN THE PRIVATE CABAL. And if you were outside watching, you already know what happened. 🔥 But today? We reset. New charts. New narratives. New runners. New opportunities. I’m not here to chase candles or ape into anything because Twitter is screaming “BUY.” We wait for the right setup, load when the risk makes sense, and let the market do the rest

78🎉72🔥58👏48👍46

31 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTCviews —

clean calls by crash pinned «🔥 898.9x $SHRUB 💰 $14.4K ➜ $13.0M MC 🦜 PIRBView (Pro) 🎯 PIRBX · Maestro · Maestro Pro 🔕 /alerts — pause milestone alerts»

31 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC≈2,540 views201 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🔥 898.9x $SHRUB 💰 $14.4K ➜ $13.0M MC 🦜 PIRBView (Pro) 🎯 PIRBX · Maestro · Maestro Pro 🔕 /alerts — pause milestone alerts

58👍44🔥36🎉35👏28

28 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,680 views313 reactionsread 3 September 2026

$RELIEF is more than a token. Hood Relief is an on-chain tool with community where people facing real struggles can submit their case, provide proof, and let the community vote. If approved, relief is sent on-chain. People helping people. Transparently. (Like go fund me) definitely bond it! 4.5x from here. CA: 0x6E8d12E3136694d77a002e6E6E6149956FB5e0Db website: https://hoodrelief.com https://t.me/hoodrelief

🔥76👏68🎉6455👍48🏆2

26 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC≈2,740 views315 reactionsread 3 September 2026

GREETINGS GREAT CABAL 🕴️ Crazy how the market can make you look like a genius one week and question every call you make the next 😂 That’s literally crypto. One day every chart you touch is pumping, narratives are flying, liquidity is everywhere and everything you call seems to run. Then the market switches up and suddenly the same people who were celebrating 5x plays are calling everything a scam because their ne

75🎉63👍61👏59🔥53🗿2🏆1🫡1

22 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTCviews —

clean calls by crash pinned «You have me and Pavel Durov stealth sharing you the next 5B dollar meme This will be legendary. Further news will be shared in the cabal»

Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @cleancallsbycrash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“clean calls by crash” (@cleancallsbycrash), 10,468 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cleancallsbycrash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.