Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Клиенты здесь⤵️

Channel

Клиенты здесь⤵️

@clienty_zdes

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,716subscribers

-78 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001527715699
TypeChannel
Username@clienty_zdes
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/clienty_zdes

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@smmacademynweyear/128722 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC@clienty_zdes/2016 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 10:41 UTC1.0027 minutes
@clienty_zdes/2020 · this entry23 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC@smmacademynweyear/129123 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC1.0072 seconds
@smmacademynweyear/129224 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC@clienty_zdes/2021 · this entry24 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC1.005 minutes
@clienty_zdes/2027 · this entry29 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC@smmacademynweyear/129829 Jul 2026, 06:58 UTC1.00under a minute
@clienty_zdes/2033 · this entry2 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC@smmacademynweyear/13032 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC1.002 minutes
@smmacademynweyear/13044 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC@clienty_zdes/2034 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@smmacademynweyear11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@smmacademynweyear (6–5)
@sila_lichnosty11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@sila_lichnosty (6–5)
@hms_vipchatsmm10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@hms_vipchatsmm (6–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 4, the earliest publisher we hold is @smmacademynweyear. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

6,7166,7946,7557 August 2026 — 6,794 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,794 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,791 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,780 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,767 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,766 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,762 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,759 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,752 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,745 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,732 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,725 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,716 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -78. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,704–6,806 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 20:196,716-9
13 Sept 2026, 05:016,725-7
9 Sept 2026, 03:206,732-13
3 Sept 2026, 14:216,745-7
31 Aug 2026, 13:546,752-7
28 Aug 2026, 14:236,759-3
25 Aug 2026, 04:166,762-4
21 Aug 2026, 16:576,766-4
18 Aug 2026, 19:366,770+3
16 Aug 2026, 03:186,767-13
12 Aug 2026, 14:456,780-11
9 Aug 2026, 23:356,791-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:176,794no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:026,794first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 25 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 28s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 17 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1332.5%
🤝820.0%
🔥615.0%
🤗615.0%
💋25.00%
🥰25.00%
🎉12.50%
👌12.50%
😍12.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC29 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Можете сразу закрыть это сообщение… Если вам абсолютно не интересны лишние 30 000 ₽ на карту без смены работы. Пока все рассказывают, как круто уметь пользоваться нейросетями, и на этом все — делайте с этой информацией что хотите. Я хочу на практике показать, как на этом зарабатывают. Спойлер: вы так сможете сразу после парочки моих бесплатных уроков. Чтобы зафиксировать бесплатное место нажмите сюда👇 https://edu…

19 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC40 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Надо вести соцсети. А снимать себя совсем не хочется. Знакомо? Не каждый готов постоянно показывать лицо, дом, семью и превращать свою жизнь в сериал ради новых клиентов. Но полезные короткие видео можно создавать и без съёмок. Вместо вас в кадре будет нарисованный герой, а нейросеть поможет придумать сюжет, оживить персонажа и добавить голос. В статье простыми словами и на понятных примерах показали, как такой фо…

18 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

5 правил роста в деньгах и в жизни 1. Не отказывайтесь от целей. Ситуация может меняться быстро, вводные — сдвигаться. Меняйте тактику, но продолжайте двигаться к своей цели. 2. В адекватных пределах не бойтесь ошибаться, рисковать и вкладываться. Без действий не бывает новых результатов. 3. Воспринимайте кризис как лучшее время для накопления ресурсов. Именно в сложные периоды можно заложить фундамент для суперре…

❤1

16 Aug 2026, 09:21 UTC61 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Огласите весь список, пожалуйста .....всего, что вы умеете. Там уже прячется новая услуга. Помните Федю из «Операции “Ы”»? «Кто не работает, тот ест. Учись, студент!» Кажется, в 2026 году эта схема наконец стала законной 😄 Пока вы пьёте чай, ИИ-агент может: посмотреть длинный урок и оставить главное; разобрать ваши материалы; найти в опыте идею для новой услуги; подготовить текст или исследование; собрать результа…

❤1

15 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC60 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Если сейчас у вас непростой период — хочется перемен, но непонятно, куда двигаться дальше, — пожалуйста, помните: с вами всё нормально. Не обязательно уже знать ответы. Не обязательно иметь чёткий план. Иногда сначала нужно просто остановиться, выдохнуть и честно посмотреть на то, что происходит внутри. Именно для этого мы приглашаем вас на практикум «Трансформация» https://cr.i-sales.pro/transforma?utm_source=soci…

14 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC58 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

«Я не трус, но я боюсь» Примерно так сегодня многие смотрят на ИИ-агентов. Вдруг сложно? Вдруг нажму не туда? Вдруг все уже разобрались, а я одна стою красивая и ничего не понимаю? Спокойно. «Шеф, всё пропало!» отменяется 😄 ИИ-агент — это не экзамен по программированию. Это помощник, которому вы обычными словами поручаете целую работу. Не просто: «Напиши один пост». А: «Изучи мои материалы, найди сильные темы, под…

❤1🔥1😍1

12 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC80 views2 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Знакомьтесь: Аркадий Маркетологович Он появляется ровно в тот момент, когда вы садитесь писать пост и понимаете, что в голове остались только две мысли: «Надо что-то полезное» и «Господи, только не опять». Аркадий Маркетологович не осуждает. Он поправляет воображаемые очки и спокойно уточняет: — Что сегодня продаём? — Кому? — Почему они должны это купить? — И зачем вы опять начали пост со слов «ни для кого не секре…

🔥1🤝1

11 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC80 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

А чьи мозги вы бы взяли к себе на работу? 😏 Анны Демидовой? Михаила Христосенко? Или специалиста, который за пять минут видит то, над чем вы думаете неделю? Теперь не обязательно заманивать его огромной зарплатой и печеньками 😄 Можно создать ИИ-агента, дать ему нужные знания, правила и логику работы — и получить собственного цифрового сотрудника. На новом практикуме от SMM Академии вы соберёте такого агента сами. …

10 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC87 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

Пока многие только наблюдают за изменениями в Telegram и ждут, что будет дальше, самые дальновидные уже разбираются, как использовать новые возможности Сейчас важно не просто «сидеть» в Telegram, а понимать: 👆 какие изменения произошли; 👆 на что обратить внимание прямо сейчас; 👆 какие инструменты могут дать вам преимущество; 👆 как превратить новые возможности в реальные результаты. Мало кто готов делиться такой инф…

8 Aug 2026, 06:10 UTC81 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пока все обсуждают слухи о том, что Telegram «ВСЕ», самые быстрые уже забирают здесь клиентов. Люди не ушли читать газеты и не исчезли из интернета. Они по-прежнему проводят время в Telegram. Самая горячая аудитория — здесь. Вопрос только один: готовы ли вы забрать эту аудиторию себе, пока другие сомневаются? И сейчас для этого действительно лучшее время. Вы можете прямо сейчас закрыть этот пост, отложить всё «на…

❤1🎉1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC77 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Сразу к делу! Я могу бесконечно долго рассказывать, как крут вайб-кодинг, какие там чеки и как легко всё автоматизировать. Но слова не действуют. Действуют только факты. Поэтому я предлагаю вам сделку🤝 Вы выделяете мне немного своего времени, а я прямо на ваших глазах соберу рабочий сайт (приложение/бота, тут все зависит от того, что нужно именно вам) с помощью вайб-кодинга. ✅Покажу, что и куда нажимать ✅Как прави…

❤2🤗1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @clienty_zdes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Михаил Христосенко
@m_hristosenko · 25,445
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клиенты здесь⤵️” (@clienty_zdes), 6,716 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/clienty_zdes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.