Posted without readable text
custom 53414954126436320426custom 53416606829851834055🔥4

Channel
@cloud_track
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,071subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001651244842 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cloud_track |
| Description | Делимся опытом и экспертизой, рассказываем, что под капотом платформы Yandex Cloud, какие подходы и технологии применяем при её создании. Сайт: https://yandex.cloud/ru/careers Вакансии: https://yandex.ru/jobs/services/cloud |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 20 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 20 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cloud_track |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:44 | 8,071 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 8,075 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 8,074 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 8,075 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 8,078 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 8,081 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 8,081 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,082 |
| Reactions total | 237 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
237 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 67 | 28.3% | |
| custom 5341660682985183405 | 46 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5341495412643632042 | 43 | 18.1% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 17.7% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 9.70% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 4.22% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.422% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
custom 53414954126436320426custom 53416606829851834055🔥4
Posted without readable text
custom 534166068298518340514❤8🔥7👍3👏1
⏪️Не спрашивайте, почему сервис называется «Ферма». Спросите лучше, как он умудрился вырасти из одного скрипта в оркестратор на Docker и Kubernetes.⏩️
❤10🔥5👍3
🟣 ИТ-сообщество разбилось на два лагеря Одни говорят, что программирование с LLM — это неконтролируемая каша, а вторые — что без этого ты будешь не востребован. Я не хочу агитировать за какой-то из лагерей, а предлагаю научный подход — взять гипотезу и проверить её. Привет! На связи Михаил Петров, эксперт команды разработки платформы Stackland. За 8 месяцев мы сделали 11 Kubernetes-операторов с нуля. Добиться высок…
👍9❤2🔥2
Ожидание — яркий корпоратив, реальность — рекорд России по боковой планке 🔥 Это мог бы быть обычный тимбилдинг, но мы решили сделать что-нибудь неординарное. И получилось! На связи Елена Симененко, event manager Yandex Cloud. Всё, что касается мерча и тимбилдингов, — это к моей команде. В карточках рассказываю, как мы установили новый рекорд России по боковой планке и что за этим стояло.
custom 53414954126436320428🥰6🔥5custom 53416606829851834053
⚡️ Вечеринка супергероев и побитый рекорд России? Да! Что вы делаете, когда собираетесь с коллегами на вечеринку? Мы любим делать что-то необычное и запоминающееся. Представьте больше 800 человек в костюмах супергероев. Примерно так выглядел наш последний корпоратив — пруфы прикрепили. А что есть у каждого супергероя? Конечно, суперсила. Именно её мы решили проявить… и побили рекорд России 💪 🔥Какой именно — расскаж…
❤9🔥7custom 53414954126436320427custom 53416606829851834053😁1
💻 Есть идея для сайта или игры? Самое время воплотить её в VibeСraft. До 28 августа участвуйте в конкурсе от VibeСraft и поборитесь за призы. Кстати, новым пользователям дарим 4 000 нейрокредитов на создание проектов. ➡️ Все условия здесь
🔥6❤5🥰4
🎤 Александр Петрухин записывает голосовое сообщение… Привет! Меня зовут Саша. Я руковожу командой автоматизации управления распределёнными системами. Наша глобальная цель — сделать YDB максимально отказоустойчивой и масштабируемой. И вы можете в этом помочь. Вместе с нами вы будете: 🔺 Разрабатывать отказоустойчивую инфраструктуру YDB и вокруг неё 🔺 Создавать Internal Developer Platform 🔺 Мигрировать сервисы в Docke…
custom 53414954126436320427🔥3custom 53416606829851834053
✉️ Как устроен SOC в Yandex Cloud «Наша команда развивалась одновременно с SOC. Мне кажется, это характерная особенность Яндекса: вливаться в новое и формировать его будущее». Привет! Я Андрей Петриков, руководитель группы обнаружения и реагирования на угрозы в Yandex Cloud. Делюсь, как устроена работа в команде безопасности Yandex Cloud и каким я вижу её будущее, а ещё почему не верю, что автоматизация отнимет ра…
🔥8custom 53414954126436320424custom 53416606829851834054
❔ Аббревиатура RULKC вам о чём-нибудь говорит? ➡️ Тогда до встречи 14 августа. Ладно, ладно, рассказываем: в этот день Russian Linux Kernel Community, они же RULKC, проведут свой третий митап. И не где-то, а в офисе Yandex Cloud. Будут два технических доклада по ядру Linux, новости проекта LANDAU и открытый микрофон. Описание докладов можно почитать тут. А вот ссылка на регистрацию. Советуем не затягивать с решени…
👍5custom 53416606829851834053custom 53414954126436320421
🔶 У многих облачных сервисов снаружи довольно простой интерфейс. Но под их капотом живут «чудовища-задачи», которые начинают «кусаться» на масштабе. Привет! Я Владислав Архипов из команды безопасности Yandex Cloud. На Young Con я показал трёх таких «монстров» из сервисов безопасности Yandex Cloud: 🔺 Highload 🔺 Алгоритмы 🔺 ИИ-агенты Исследовали их в карточках и в записи доклада. ➡️ А если тоже хотите «приручать» п…
🔥3custom 53414954126436320422custom 53416606829851834052❤1
❔❔ Задайте вопрос и получите приз Привет! Я Иван Пузыревский, CTO Yandex Cloud. Мы с командой во всю готовимся к Yandex Scale 2026. Заглянул в канал, чтобы пригласить вас задавать мне вопросы. Можно спросить про будущее AI, устройство облачной инфраструктуры, развитие Yandex Cloud или даже о том, что происходит за кулисами большой технологической компании и другие детали, которые вас интересуют. Пишите вопросы в к…
❤7custom 53416606829851834057🔥5custom 53414954126436320423👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @cloud_track. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@cloud_track edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 804,368 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Inside Yandex Cloud” (@cloud_track), 8,071 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloud_track.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.