Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cloud.ru

Channel

Cloud.ru

@cloudruprovider

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,246subscribers

+61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001977123101
TypeChannel
Username@cloudruprovider
DescriptionCloud․ru — ведущий провайдер облачных и AI-технологий. ⭐️ № 1 в сегменте IaaS, iKS-Consulting, 2025 ⭐️ № 1 в сегменте PaaS, iKS-Consulting, 2025 ⭐️ № 1 на рынке искусcтвенного интеллекта, CNews Analytics, 2026 Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3GqrVn
Created5 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cloudruprovider

Growth

10,18510,24910,2176 August 2026 — 10,185 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,185 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,191 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,196 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,208 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,202 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,212 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,223 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,240 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,237 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,236 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,244 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,248 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,249 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,246 subscribers10,2466 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net +61. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,175–10,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 07:5710,246-3
20 Aug 2026, 23:4510,249+1
19 Aug 2026, 21:3810,248+4
18 Aug 2026, 22:5610,244+8
17 Aug 2026, 19:4510,236-1
16 Aug 2026, 18:2910,237-3
15 Aug 2026, 07:4510,240+4
14 Aug 2026, 00:5510,236+13
12 Aug 2026, 16:4310,223+11
11 Aug 2026, 19:0410,212+10
10 Aug 2026, 19:5110,202-6
9 Aug 2026, 21:2110,208+12
8 Aug 2026, 22:2110,196+5
7 Aug 2026, 21:5110,191+6
6 Aug 2026, 22:3010,185no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:1810,185first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 10,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,290
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held22 (20 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total43,535
Reactions total616
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,340
Videos
144
Links
651

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

738 reactions across 22 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥32243.6%
custom 523556531421266290010514.2%
👍10213.8%
custom 5399984414719519046608.13%
385.15%
👀192.57%
🤩152.03%
❤‍🔥111.49%
💯111.49%
🤝91.22%
custom 523792907093885876381.08%
70.949%
👏70.949%
😱70.949%
custom 523819225794482189750.678%
custom 523998859795159957040.542%
🥰30.407%
custom 535727142022729769520.271%
🙏20.271%
custom 531012242030305953110.136%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 738reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 22 we hold a reading for · 23%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cloudruprovider. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC845 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Как работать с Kubernetes в 2026 году 💬 Kubernetes «любит» дисциплину. Но, как правило, по-настоящему начинаешь понимать это только после первых инцидентов. В статье на Хабре обсуждаем лучшие практики работы с Kubernetes, которые помогают держать кластеры надежными, безопасными и экономичными: задавать requests и limits, изолировать нагрузки, автоматизировать health checks. Читайте полный разбор на Хабре

🔥96custom 53999844147195190463👀2custom 52355653142126629002

19 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,330 views24 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

На старте ИИ-проекта для инференса часто используют API ⤵️ Но по мере роста нагрузки, требований к безопасности и затрат возникает потребность в собственной ИИ-инфраструктуре. На вебинаре 25 августа расскажем, когда пора переходить на Bare Metal и как построить инфраструктуру для запуска моделей в продакшене. Что обсудим ▶️Когда для инференса достаточно API, а когда переходить на собственную инфраструктуру ▶️Как

🔥11👍73custom 52355653142126629003

18 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,750 views42 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Мы завершили аттестацию инфраструктуры «Облака для КИИ» по требованиям приказа №117 ФСТЭК России и получили наивысший класс защищенности ГИС — К1. Ранее мы также вошли в перечень провайдеров хостинга ГИС, что является обязательным требованием при размещении не только ГИС, но и других систем. ➡️ Подробнее об «Облаке для КИИ» Наше решение аттестовано сразу по трем актам ФСТЭК России и позволяет размещать: ▶️ГИС с кл

👍18🔥12custom 52355653142126629007💯3👀2

18 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,450 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Disaster Recovery и Backup — как выбрать решение под ваш бизнес 🛡 Уже через 1 час встречаемся на вебинаре — обсудим различия Disaster Recovery и Backup и посмотрим их возможности на разных сценариях. Не забудьте зарегистрироваться

9🔥6custom 53999844147195190464👍3

18 Aug 2026, 06:46 UTC≈1,420 views29 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 523556531421266290011🔥6custom 52379290709388587635custom 53999844147195190465🤝2

14 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈5,970 views29 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Модели, агенты и будущее, которое уже наступило 👁 Во втором выпуске подкаста мы пригласили Александра Абрамова, Head of AI и автора Telegram-канала Dealer․AI, чтобы поговорить о мире ИИ — от практики до агентной экономики и будущего технологий. В программе: ▶️Нейропластичность и какие еще навыки сегодня важно развивать ▶️Можно ли доверить свой бизнес полностью ИИ-агентам ▶️Перспективы агентной экономики ▶️Парадигма

🔥14👍7🤩6custom 52355653142126629002

13 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈2,030 views26 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Новости Cloud․ru Evolution ☁️ Собрали самое важное за месяц в одной статье: ▶️Открыли исходный код Guardrails Filter — инструмента для защиты чувствительных данных при работе с LLM. ▶️Добавили новые модели в сервис Evolution Foundation Models. ▶️Внесли обновления в Evolution Object Storage, Managed Kubernetes, Managed Redis и Managed Trino. ▶️Обновили Гига-помощника — ИИ-помощника для работы в облаке. ▶️На главн

🔥127👍4custom 52355653142126629003

12 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈2,240 views45 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026
Photo

Спросить ИИ ➡️ Делегировать ИИ Мы запустили Cloud․ru Agents Space — пространство для использования и создания персональных ИИ-агентов. Ставьте задачи в удобном чате, загружайте файлы, подключайте нужные сервисы и делегируйте рутину ИИ-агентам. Что внутри ▶️ГигаАгент — первый в России автономный универсальный ИИ-агент для решения повседневных задач ▶️Возможность создать собственного агента под конкретные задачи ▶️П

custom 523556531421266290018🔥13👏7😱7

10 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,090 views46 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

HiveTrace развернул AI Firewall в облаке Cloud․ru AI Firewall — решение для защиты корпоративных GenAI-приложений. Клиенты HiveTrace работают в разных отраслях, и требования к инфраструктуре различаются. Поэтому команде нужна была единая платформа, которая закрывает все требования к работе с персональными данными, ГИС, КИИ и финансовыми системами. Что сделали Развернули AI Firewall в облаке Cloud․ru Evolution: ▶

🔥20👍13custom 53999844147195190468👀5

7 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈2,470 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Disaster Recovery и Backup решают разные задачи, но их часто путают 😕 Backup сохраняет и восстанавливает данные, а DR — работоспособность всей инфраструктуры. 18 августа на вебинаре обсудим, как выбрать стратегию восстановления с учетом требований бизнеса, RPO и RTO. Вы узнаете: ▶️что происходит при отказе ЦОД и чем это грозит бизнесу ▶️когда нужны Evolution Disaster Recovery и Evolution Agent Backup ▶️как соотн

9custom 52355653142126629005🔥3custom 52379290709388587633custom 53999844147195190462

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈2,060 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

Доверяете ли вы сложные задачи ИИ-агентам? 👁

  1. Да, использую агента для сложных задач44%
  2. Использую агента только для рутинных задач41%
  3. Только тестирую их возможности23%
  4. Пока не работаю с ИИ-агентами12%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 52355653142126629003custom 53572714202272976952custom 53999844147195190462

6 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC≈2,010 views27 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Четыре мифа об ИИ-агентах Главная ошибка в разговоре об ИИ-агентах — оценивать их по демо. Демо почти всегда выглядит круто, но в проде все упирается в границы ответственности, данных и безопасности. В карточках разбираем популярные мифы об ИИ-агентах и обозначаем реальные границы их возможностей. 📌 А полный разбор возможностей и ограничений современных ИИ-агентов — читайте в статье на Хабре.

🔥11custom 53999844147195190467💯5👍3🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @cloudruprovider. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Poll225 voters

Доверяете ли вы сложные задачи ИИ-агентам? 👁

  1. Да, использую агента для сложных задач44%
  2. Использую агента только для рутинных задач41%
  3. Только тестирую их возможности23%
  4. Пока не работаю с ИИ-агентами12%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 76,678 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Selectel
@Selectel · 63,648
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cloud.ru” (@cloudruprovider), 10,246 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloudruprovider.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.