Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
68 measurements spanning 50 days, net +267,196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 144,152–492,373 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 68
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 03:57
451,527
+3,143
18 Sept 2026, 23:19
448,384
-3,089
18 Sept 2026, 11:57
451,473
+617
16 Sept 2026, 13:41
450,856
+1,576
16 Sept 2026, 05:19
449,280
-2,914
14 Sept 2026, 20:36
452,194
+7
14 Sept 2026, 13:22
452,187
+500
13 Sept 2026, 06:59
451,687
+85
13 Sept 2026, 00:40
451,602
+3,162
11 Sept 2026, 06:20
448,440
+828
11 Sept 2026, 01:39
447,612
+931
8 Sept 2026, 08:15
446,681
+21
8 Sept 2026, 03:17
446,660
+268
5 Sept 2026, 01:00
446,392
no change
4 Sept 2026, 23:37
446,392
+112
3 Sept 2026, 09:59
446,280
no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:23
446,280
+4,854
2 Sept 2026, 03:54
441,426
+16
2 Sept 2026, 00:14
441,410
-1,632
1 Sept 2026, 00:27
443,042
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.2%
avg views ÷ 451,527 subscribers
Avg views / post
68,700
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 September 2026
Posts held
43 (16 July 2026 – 17 September 2026)
Views total
480,700
Reactions total
14,980
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Sept 2026, 07:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
53
Videos
11
Links
35
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
18s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
71,413 reactions across 41 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5256135540385816565
71,413
100.0%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 73,053 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2,390
across the posts below
Posts paid on
41
of 43 we hold a reading for · 95%
Most on one post
1,060
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @club67. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 43 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 17 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🫥 PROBABLY FOUND YOU
you might’ve noticed the new Profile Page just dropped
btw allocation got the spoiler treatment for now 🫥
for last days we put in a gram ton of work tracking down bots, cheaters and anyone trying to game the system
almost 30% of the entire Points supply was literally bots’ free bags
so we did what had to be done - we’re coming for y’all 🥰
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥
we’ve moved to a new $67 pool on DeDust 👀
nothing to panic about - all the info in the app will be updated throughout the day
btw swap fees have been reduced on the new pool 🫥
we’ve got a lot more news cominnn… 🎁
🫥 WE KNOW YOU’RE WAITING. WE ARE TOO.
we’ve got a few debts to settle first, including the commemorative NFTs & 67 Maxxin Meme Contest rewards (btw pulled 15M+ impressions in total) 🫥
they’re not forgotten and we’ll get everything sent out once the final checks are done 😭
right now we’re busy with some behind-the-scenes prep
🪙 today for example $67 officially made it onto CoinMarketCap
as they say…
believe in s…
67 DEV TEAM 👑 - COMMUNITY 👊 0:1
we spent the last 2 days reading through your feedback across socials after announcing «Split or Steal» and yep…
we heard you guys
the idea of distributing the first wave through the «Split or Steal» game received a lot of negative feedback and after looking at it from your side, we realized that this simply isn’t the way to Make TMA Great Again 🎁
if we want to build something that…
🫥 SPLIT OR STEAL THE DROP
first of all, to be eligible for the first wave you need to meet BOTH conditions:
✅ Pass the Activity Check
✅ Hold ≥67 $67 Tokens
and before you ask - no holder snapshot has been taken yet
you still have time to become eligible but the event can go live at any moment 🫥
the first wave of the Drop Redeem Event will be called “Split or Steal”
tl;dr
• you’ll put your Points on the line, c…
🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥🫥
all $$ prize rewards are currently being sent out to the winners / the commemorative NFTs will follow shortly and land in the same wallets
the 🫥 Maxxin Meme Contest is also officially wrapped - we’ll reach out to all the winners directly and send out their rewards once we’ve reviewed all the submitted content
btw
tomorrow we’re revealing all the details about the first wave of the Drop Redeem Event
yes,…
🎣 TOURNAMENT ARC COMPLETE
the 🫥 Fisher Tournament ended a few hours ago
someone managed to pull a 149,017.696 KG whale out of the pond 😭
the tournament results are almost here & the rewards will be distributed soon
and the Drop Redeem Event is next 🎁
patience pays. sometimes literally.
🎣 ONE CAST CAN CHANGE THE LORE
less than 24 hours left in the 🫥 Fishing Championship
the pond is still hiding some whales…
useful tip: the deeper you fish, the bigger the catch 😳
🎣 JUST WHEN I THOUGHT I WAS OUT… THEY PULLED ME BACK IN
we’re launching the Best Fisher Tournament - and the mission is simple: catch the fattest fish you can 🤓
you’ve already played 2M+ fishing sessions, so at this point we’ve basically fished out the entire pond 🎁
we took the lessons from 67 Legend and decided to make the prize pool even more serious this time: $25,000 + 100 exclusive NFTs for the top fishers!
…
🧐 BRO IS FISHING WHILE WE’RE COOKING THE DROP
the first wave of the Drop Redeem Event is landing next week 🫥
we’ve cooked up a special redemption mechanic to keep the distribution balanced and make sure the drop turn into a complete degen fiesta ☺️
for the first wave, eligible users will be able to redeem up to 20% of their total drop allocation - no vesting, no cliff
while we get everything ready….
go touch som…
🫥 FISHING - BIG FISH BIG W!
we’re already seeing some fat catches in 67 Fishing including TG gifts like Scared Cat 🎁
btw Golden Hours run from 00:00 to 08:00 UTC so if you’re hunting for the legendary Golden Fish you know when to lock in
also quick heads up on CATCH ‘EM ALL - it counts different fish species caught not the number of casts so start filling that collection 😌
and if you’re already out of 🪱
new ways…
🫥 MAKE 67 MEMES GREAT AGAIN!
Create SIXSEVEN content - memes, videos, edits or any 67 idea you come up with.
Choose a platform, submit your entry through the bot & compete for rewards.
📱 Platforms: X, TikTok & Instagram
💸 Total Prize Pool: $10000 in $SIXSEVEN
👑 50 winners per platform
🔑 67 IQ CHAT: Special fund of $2000 for members
🫥 Unlimited entries. The best creatives win.
Submit here: @six_seven_contest_bot
custom 5256135540385816565901
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @club67. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 41 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Six Seven Club” (@club67), 451,527 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/club67.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.