Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Полищук. Карьерная проводница

Channel

Полищук. Карьерная проводница

@coachpolishuk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,649subscribers

-139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001335489669
TypeChannel
Username@coachpolishuk
Created20 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/coachpolishuk

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,64910,78810,718.56 August 2026 — 10,788 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,784 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,779 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,776 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,769 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,766 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,772 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,763 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,767 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,762 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,770 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,764 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,753 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,747 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,745 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,744 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,741 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,737 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,738 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,737 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,736 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,726 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,716 subscribers7 September 2026 — 10,704 subscribers10 September 2026 — 10,688 subscribers12 September 2026 — 10,673 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,666 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,657 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,649 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -139. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,628–10,809 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 03:1710,649-8
15 Sept 2026, 19:0210,657-9
14 Sept 2026, 02:3810,666-7
12 Sept 2026, 12:0010,673-15
10 Sept 2026, 07:5710,688-16
7 Sept 2026, 03:0010,704-12
4 Sept 2026, 10:5510,716-10
1 Sept 2026, 23:0510,726-1
31 Aug 2026, 21:4510,727-9
30 Aug 2026, 20:4510,736-1
29 Aug 2026, 22:0310,737-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:3610,738+1
27 Aug 2026, 21:2310,737-4
26 Aug 2026, 18:0710,741-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:3310,744-1
24 Aug 2026, 18:4310,745-2
22 Aug 2026, 23:5510,747-6
21 Aug 2026, 11:1810,753-4
20 Aug 2026, 11:0710,757-7
19 Aug 2026, 10:3710,764first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 10,649 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,220
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held29 (16 June 202631 August 2026)
Views total4,897
Reactions total103
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,690 reactions across 28 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,18470.1%
🔥24414.4%
❤‍🔥895.27%
👍563.31%
😁271.60%
👏241.42%
😭171.01%
👀110.651%
💔110.651%
🐳70.414%
🥰50.296%
👌40.237%
🤔20.118%
🥴20.118%
👎10.059%
💅10.059%
💯10.059%
😴10.059%
🙏10.059%
🤮10.059%
1 further kind10.059%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,690 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC867 views8 reactionsread 1 September 2026

Что делать, если надо прокачивать новые навыки, а сил и энергии нет? Этот вопрос прислали, пока мы готовили завтрашний эфир о том, как адаптироваться к рынку труда в 2027 году с Вероникой Климовой. Ответ вам понравится: не пытаться освоить всё, а сфокусироваться на задачах, которые становятся критическими для бизнеса и вашей роли. Смотреть не на AI-инструменты в целом, которые «надо освоить». Масштаб этой задачи б

8

31 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,050 views54 reactionsread 1 September 2026

В 2026-м, похоже, мы вошли в эпоху пожизненной смены карьеры. Как мы к этому пришли? 2005–2013: эпоха «деньги — статус — стабильность» Золотые годы корпоративной лестницы. Ты выбирал направление, держался его и собирал должности. Менять работу раз в два года было красным флагом. Единственный альтернатива найму — свой бизнес, но это дорого, гемморойно и точно не для всех. 2014–2019: эпоха «найди своё призвание» Пре

23😭17👏7🔥4💔3

26 Aug 2026, 08:36 UTC≈1,520 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Суперкомбо этой осени: зарплата перестала соответствовать стоимости жизни + задачи не развивают + статус больше не впечатляет + неопределённость рынка. По отдельности всё это ещё терпимо. Но в комбинации превращается в ощущение: «Всё, надо менять». Что, собственно, вы и хотите сделать, судя по результатам опроса на прошлой неделе 🙂. Как бороться с этим комбо? (которое вынимает всю душу) Понимать контекст и то, на

11👍6❤‍🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈1,460 views23 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

12 супер востребованных профессий в сфере AI ➡️LinkedIn выкатил очередной мини-репорт Но, кажется, правильнее называть их не новыми профессиями, а сочетаниями навыков. А в отчете интересны циферки: сколько можешь зарабатывать, если умеет встроить AI в свою профессиональную экспертизу. И еще он фиксирует, что женщины получают меньше. Все 12 ролей можно разложить на три блока. 1️⃣ Строители — Builders AI Engineer,

20❤‍🔥3

21 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC≈1,400 views29 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

29

21 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,320 views18 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

18

21 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,050 views75 reactionsread 26 August 2026

3 смена. Отряд «Веретьево». Неделю назад вернулась из лагеря для взрослых. Он же коливинг. Он же какая-то прекрасная дурь около речки, ради которой люди летят в Подмосковье и ждут этих двух недель весь год. Не фестиваль. Не ретрит. Не закрытый клуб. Ты просто две недели живёшь, работаешь и тусишь в обществе приятных людей: часть знаешь, часть видишь впервые. И все это на магии самоорганизации. Программа состоит из

69❤‍🔥5👏1

19 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC≈1,090 views0 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Poll

Что вас больше всего волнует?

  1. Моя роль исчезает и ее очень меняет AI, а что дальше не знаю16%
  2. Хочу поменять ВСЕ: зп, нишу, компанию, переехать, что делать?66%
  3. Как стать востребованным и AI first в моей профессии?30%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC874 views21 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Созванивались на этой неделе с Вероникой Климовой, очень люблю, как она въедливо смотрит на вакансии в мире и России и подмечает тренды в изменениях требований. Говорили, как развиваться в профессии, если смысла в работе не видишь и кажется, что везде одна и та же бессмысленная хрень. Мой ответ такой: не быть заложником профессии, её названия и не вешать на себя ярлык. Вместо этого двигаться на основе навыков и выб

16👍4👎1

13 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,480 views38 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Если бы названия маркетинг позиций были поточнее… Абсолютно гениальный креатив от Semrush. А вы бы как свою позицию называли поточнее?

28😁10

7 Aug 2026, 14:19 UTC≈2,090 views106 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Эксперимент на американский рынок или дорога кринжа Переделала позиционирование в LinkedIn. В качестве эксперимента по выходу на новый рынок — как Founder AI-компаньона по сопровождению в карьерном переходе. До этого LinkedIn у меня был, но там стояло позиционирование для консалтинга: Founder advisor и фасилитатор. Гипотеза была такая: Телега и Insta — для экспертизы в перепридумывании, рассказа о моих сервисах, Ла

60🔥32❤‍🔥13💅1

5 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈2,020 views117 reactionsread 21 August 2026

IKEA переучила 8 500 человек и в итоге отрастила 3% новой выручки. Нормальная такая точка роста, если у тебя уже давно работающий бизнес. Я тут искала кейсы AI-автоматизации и рылась в том, как автоматизируют поддержку. Support сегодня первый кандидат на трансформацию и оптимизацию: с одной стороны, многое можно оцифровать и перевести на ботов, с другой — это фронтир компаний, где скапливается много данных, и интер

🔥7045👌2

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @coachpolishuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@coachpolishuk edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTCAnonymous Poll194 voters

Что вас больше всего волнует?

  1. Моя роль исчезает и ее очень меняет AI, а что дальше не знаю16%
  2. Хочу поменять ВСЕ: зп, нишу, компанию, переехать, что делать?66%
  3. Как стать востребованным и AI first в моей профессии?30%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Девушка с Деньгами
@devushkasdengami · 28,215
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Olymarkes Daily
@markesdaily · 28,205
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Канал Вари Веденеевой
@varya_daily · 31,642
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 September 2026
Нагуглила карьеру
@dreamcatchme · 27,083
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
Matskevich - brains, love and robots
@Matskevich · 25,302
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Dasha’s notes | люди и смыслы
@technohumanist · 37,699
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Полищук. Карьерная проводница” (@coachpolishuk), 10,649 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coachpolishuk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.